Chinese medicine and complexity

Zhu Jianping, Ken Rose
{"title":"Chinese medicine and complexity","authors":"Zhu Jianping,&nbsp;Ken Rose","doi":"10.1054/caom.2002.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Chinese medical theory and complexity theory are two distinct bodies of knowledge concerned with the nature and behavior of natural systems. The former is an artifact from mankind's ancient past; the latter is a vanguard of contemporary science. Yet the basic principles and modes of thinking in these two subjects can be productively compared and employed to make connections between ideas and individuals from apparently disparate backgrounds. These connections may provide insights to all involved. This paper presents some basic comparisons and explores potential ways to begin to construct links between a millennia-old method of traditional medicine and methodologies that lie at the frontiers of modern scientific knowledge. Topics addressed include: the dilemma facing modern Western medicine, the methodology of Chinese medicine, relationships between Chinese medicine and complexity theory, keys to further research, including: language and terminology, analysis of medicinal formulas, analysis of diagnostic and therapeutic principles and procedures, and the application of the metaphoric mode of thinking of Chinese medicine to the investigation of complex adaptive systems. Finally, there is a statement of principles that should be borne in mind by researchers in development of detailed guidelines and criteria for the design of studies and the evaluation of results.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100265,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine","volume":"3 2","pages":"Pages 77-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1054/caom.2002.0008","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1461144902900083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Chinese medical theory and complexity theory are two distinct bodies of knowledge concerned with the nature and behavior of natural systems. The former is an artifact from mankind's ancient past; the latter is a vanguard of contemporary science. Yet the basic principles and modes of thinking in these two subjects can be productively compared and employed to make connections between ideas and individuals from apparently disparate backgrounds. These connections may provide insights to all involved. This paper presents some basic comparisons and explores potential ways to begin to construct links between a millennia-old method of traditional medicine and methodologies that lie at the frontiers of modern scientific knowledge. Topics addressed include: the dilemma facing modern Western medicine, the methodology of Chinese medicine, relationships between Chinese medicine and complexity theory, keys to further research, including: language and terminology, analysis of medicinal formulas, analysis of diagnostic and therapeutic principles and procedures, and the application of the metaphoric mode of thinking of Chinese medicine to the investigation of complex adaptive systems. Finally, there is a statement of principles that should be borne in mind by researchers in development of detailed guidelines and criteria for the design of studies and the evaluation of results.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中医与复杂性
中医理论和复杂性理论是两个不同的知识体系,涉及自然系统的性质和行为。前者是人类远古时代的产物;后者是当代科学的先锋。然而,这两门学科的基本原则和思维方式可以有效地进行比较,并用于在明显不同背景的思想和个人之间建立联系。这些联系可以为所有相关人员提供见解。本文提出了一些基本的比较,并探讨了在一种千年的传统医学方法和位于现代科学知识前沿的方法之间开始建立联系的潜在方法。讨论的主题包括:现代西医面临的困境,中医的方法论,中医与复杂性理论的关系,进一步研究的关键,包括:语言和术语,药物配方的分析,诊断和治疗原则和程序的分析,以及中医隐喻思维模式在复杂适应系统研究中的应用。最后,研究人员在制定设计研究和评价结果的详细指导方针和标准时应牢记的原则声明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial board A research agenda for the acupuncture community Treating hiccups with differential point prescription Influence of akupoints of principal meridians on a skeletal musculation of the person Body surface stimulation and rectal motility
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1