Una ruta hacia un sistema de aseguramiento de la calidad en Educación Superior: la experiencia del proyecto TRALL

IF 0.3 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Journal of Educational Cultural and Psychological Studies Pub Date : 2015-12-15 DOI:10.7358/ECPS-2015-012-BETT
Maurizio Betti, D. Dávila, Alejandra Martínez, I. Vannini
{"title":"Una ruta hacia un sistema de aseguramiento de la calidad en Educación Superior: la experiencia del proyecto TRALL","authors":"Maurizio Betti, D. Dávila, Alejandra Martínez, I. Vannini","doi":"10.7358/ECPS-2015-012-BETT","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article presents the structure of the evaluation design – and main results – used in the project of international cooperation between Europe and Latin America called Alfa III – TRALL (Transatlantic Lifelong Learning. Rebalancing Relations) and the experience of one project partner, the Universidad Catolica Boliviana, has been adopted as an example. The design implemented meets the need to evaluate the quality of lifelong learning courses promoted by 15 Latin American universities, partners of the project, and aims to trigger virtuous circles of progressive improvement in the efficiency and effectiveness of the training offer. This evaluation design has been defined as a «systemic model» based on analysis of the methodological framework that currently characterizes the field of educational evaluation research, connecting – from an ecological perspective – multiple indicators of the quality: input, in context, in the process, output. Furthermore, the evaluation design has been proposed, since its beginnings, participation and discussion among all partners to be as a system of quality training and transactional – where the analysis of gathered information is an opportunity to achieve collective moments of intersubjective interpretation of data – to facilitate a democratic made decision in order to improve and redesign the courses. According to the main results and the meta-evaluative reflection on the implementation of the quality system to 22 courses there are positive evidences, recognized by all partners, as some critical elements that, to improve the lifelong learning processes, will be assumed to redesign the quality system.","PeriodicalId":41872,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Cultural and Psychological Studies","volume":"123 1","pages":"77-115"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Educational Cultural and Psychological Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7358/ECPS-2015-012-BETT","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The article presents the structure of the evaluation design – and main results – used in the project of international cooperation between Europe and Latin America called Alfa III – TRALL (Transatlantic Lifelong Learning. Rebalancing Relations) and the experience of one project partner, the Universidad Catolica Boliviana, has been adopted as an example. The design implemented meets the need to evaluate the quality of lifelong learning courses promoted by 15 Latin American universities, partners of the project, and aims to trigger virtuous circles of progressive improvement in the efficiency and effectiveness of the training offer. This evaluation design has been defined as a «systemic model» based on analysis of the methodological framework that currently characterizes the field of educational evaluation research, connecting – from an ecological perspective – multiple indicators of the quality: input, in context, in the process, output. Furthermore, the evaluation design has been proposed, since its beginnings, participation and discussion among all partners to be as a system of quality training and transactional – where the analysis of gathered information is an opportunity to achieve collective moments of intersubjective interpretation of data – to facilitate a democratic made decision in order to improve and redesign the courses. According to the main results and the meta-evaluative reflection on the implementation of the quality system to 22 courses there are positive evidences, recognized by all partners, as some critical elements that, to improve the lifelong learning processes, will be assumed to redesign the quality system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高等教育质量保证体系之路:TRALL项目的经验
本文介绍了欧洲和拉丁美洲国际合作项目“阿尔法III -跨大西洋终身学习”(Alfa III - TRALL)中使用的评估设计结构和主要结果。重新平衡关系)和项目合作伙伴玻利维亚天主教大学的经验作为一个例子。实施的设计满足了评估项目合作伙伴15所拉丁美洲大学推广的终身学习课程质量的需要,旨在触发逐步提高培训效率和效果的良性循环。这种评估设计被定义为一种“系统模型”,它基于对当前教育评估研究领域的方法论框架的分析,从生态学的角度将质量的多个指标联系起来:输入、背景、过程、输出。此外,评价设计从一开始就建议所有伙伴的参与和讨论作为一个高质量培训和事务性系统- -对收集到的资料的分析是实现主体间解释数据的集体时刻的机会- -促进民主作出决定,以便改进和重新设计课程。根据对22门课程实施质量体系的主要结果和元评价反思,有积极的证据,被所有合作伙伴认可,作为改善终身学习过程的一些关键因素,将假设重新设计质量体系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
Darwin, la pandemia e il trionfo della «ignoranza credulona» o della «stupidità umana». Il caso Texas e la situazione italiana / Darwin, the Pandemic and the Triumph of «Gullible Ignorance» or of «Human Stupidity». The Case of Texas and the Italian Situation A Massive Open Online Course Designed to Support the Development of Virtual Mobility Transversal Skills: Preliminary Evaluation Results from European Participants. Misurare l’omonegatività: validazione italiana della Multidimensional Scale of Attitudes Toward Lesbians and Gay Men Ci sono differenti predittori della lettura nelle lingue che hanno un’ortografia trasparente? Evidenze da uno studio longitudinale. Are There Any Differences between the Texts Written by Students Who Are Blind, Those Who Are Partially Sighted, and Those with Normal Vision?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1