Comparison between Predicted and Measured X-Ray Output in Some Conventional Radiography Units

Calvin Didier Njiki, Yolande Huguette Ebele Yigbedeck, Joseph Eric Martial Ndjaka Manyol, Thierry Ndzana Ndah
{"title":"Comparison between Predicted and Measured X-Ray Output in Some Conventional Radiography Units","authors":"Calvin Didier Njiki, Yolande Huguette Ebele Yigbedeck, Joseph Eric Martial Ndjaka Manyol, Thierry Ndzana Ndah","doi":"10.4236/IJMPCERO.2019.84018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to investigate how accurate are TASMICS and TASMIP \nmodels in predicting the X-ray output of some Conventional Radiology X-ray \nunits with high frequency generators. The X-ray output in microgray per milliampere \nseconds (μGy/mAs) at 100 cm from the X-ray tube was determined \nfor selected high voltages and taking into account the total filtration. The \nX-ray output was then measured directly with the multi-purpose detectors \n(MPD), Raysafe X2. The maximum relative error between measured and predicted \nvalues was found to be equal to 20%. The maximum relative error between \nmeasured and predicted values obtained demonstrates the difficulty of \naccurately predicting the X-ray tube output using TASMICS and TASMIP \nmodels since they are based on fixed anode angles and different composition \nof the tungsten anode.","PeriodicalId":14028,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Physics, Clinical Engineering and Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Physics, Clinical Engineering and Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/IJMPCERO.2019.84018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study aims to investigate how accurate are TASMICS and TASMIP models in predicting the X-ray output of some Conventional Radiology X-ray units with high frequency generators. The X-ray output in microgray per milliampere seconds (μGy/mAs) at 100 cm from the X-ray tube was determined for selected high voltages and taking into account the total filtration. The X-ray output was then measured directly with the multi-purpose detectors (MPD), Raysafe X2. The maximum relative error between measured and predicted values was found to be equal to 20%. The maximum relative error between measured and predicted values obtained demonstrates the difficulty of accurately predicting the X-ray tube output using TASMICS and TASMIP models since they are based on fixed anode angles and different composition of the tungsten anode.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一些常规x射线照相设备预测与测量x射线输出的比较
本研究旨在探讨TASMICS和TASMIP模型在预测一些传统放射学高频发生器x射线装置的x射线输出时的准确性。在距离x射线管100 cm处,在考虑总过滤的情况下,确定了以微灰/毫安秒(μGy/mAs)为单位的x射线输出。然后使用多用途探测器(MPD) Raysafe X2直接测量x射线输出。实测值与预测值之间的最大相对误差为20%。得到的实测值和预测值之间的最大相对误差表明,由于TASMICS和TASMIP模型是基于固定的阳极角度和不同的钨阳极组成,因此难以准确预测x射线管输出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessment of Monitor Units and Gamma Pass Rate for 6 MV and Flattening Filter Free (FFF) Beams in Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) The Journey of SRS: An Initial Experience of Starting Sterotactic Radiosurgery Facility at Purbanchal Cancer Hospital—First in Nepal Hereditary Multiple Exostoses (HME) with Peroneal Nerve Compresion: A Case Report Dosimetric Study of the Effect of Calypso-Compatible Couch Top for Spine Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Radiation-Associated Cardiotoxicity during Breast Cancer Treatment with Ionizing Radiation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1