EFFECTS OF FLOW MEASUREMENT ERRORS ON OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION FORECASTS

Mahdi Sadri, S. Shariatipour, A. Hunt
{"title":"EFFECTS OF FLOW MEASUREMENT ERRORS ON OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION FORECASTS","authors":"Mahdi Sadri, S. Shariatipour, A. Hunt","doi":"10.2495/MPF170141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Different flow meter technologies are used to monitor the output of oil and gas wells. Although flowmeter accuracy has generally improved over time, there remain substantial uncertainties, particularly in multiphase flow. These errors could potentially be greater where older meters are being used for calibration, and/or maintenance is difficult. Consequently, the associated errors with the recorded data could be out of specification in such cases. One use of the well flow data is to improve parameter estimates for important characteristics of reservoirs such as porosity and permeability. Therefore, any errors in flow measurement influence the results of a reservoir simulation and production forecasts. However, the impact of flow measurement errors on the forecast of oil and gas production has not been considered before. In this study, the effects of using out-of-specification errors on the predicted reservoir production have been investigated. As a test case, the simulated production results of a reservoir with known characteristics were considered to be the actual flow rate values. Then, two sets of data were generated by applying errors up to 5% and 10%, respectively, to the flow rates and the resulting values were used in a history matching exercise to modify the predictions of the simulations for the same reservoir with incorrect porosity and permeability parameters. The errors in the first and second sets of data were considered to be within and without the specification, respectively. The results show that when errors are within the specification, the corrected porosity and permeability values have less than a 2.2% and 2.5% error, which cause minor deviations of up to 2.3% in the production forecast. However, for the second set of data, when the errors are increased up to 5% more than the specification, the corrected porosity, permeability and production forecast deviate significantly up to 10.8 %, 10.1% and 12.4% from their respective reference values.","PeriodicalId":23647,"journal":{"name":"WIT transactions on engineering sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":"133-142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WIT transactions on engineering sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2495/MPF170141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Different flow meter technologies are used to monitor the output of oil and gas wells. Although flowmeter accuracy has generally improved over time, there remain substantial uncertainties, particularly in multiphase flow. These errors could potentially be greater where older meters are being used for calibration, and/or maintenance is difficult. Consequently, the associated errors with the recorded data could be out of specification in such cases. One use of the well flow data is to improve parameter estimates for important characteristics of reservoirs such as porosity and permeability. Therefore, any errors in flow measurement influence the results of a reservoir simulation and production forecasts. However, the impact of flow measurement errors on the forecast of oil and gas production has not been considered before. In this study, the effects of using out-of-specification errors on the predicted reservoir production have been investigated. As a test case, the simulated production results of a reservoir with known characteristics were considered to be the actual flow rate values. Then, two sets of data were generated by applying errors up to 5% and 10%, respectively, to the flow rates and the resulting values were used in a history matching exercise to modify the predictions of the simulations for the same reservoir with incorrect porosity and permeability parameters. The errors in the first and second sets of data were considered to be within and without the specification, respectively. The results show that when errors are within the specification, the corrected porosity and permeability values have less than a 2.2% and 2.5% error, which cause minor deviations of up to 2.3% in the production forecast. However, for the second set of data, when the errors are increased up to 5% more than the specification, the corrected porosity, permeability and production forecast deviate significantly up to 10.8 %, 10.1% and 12.4% from their respective reference values.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
流量测量误差对油气产量预测的影响
不同的流量计技术被用于监测油气井的产量。虽然流量计的精度随着时间的推移而普遍提高,但仍然存在很大的不确定性,特别是在多相流中。在使用旧仪表进行校准和/或维护困难的情况下,这些误差可能会更大。因此,在这种情况下,与记录数据相关的错误可能会超出规范。井流数据的一个用途是改进对储层重要特征(如孔隙度和渗透率)的参数估计。因此,流量测量中的任何误差都会影响油藏模拟和产量预测的结果。然而,流量测量误差对油气产量预测的影响一直没有得到重视。在本研究中,研究了使用超规范误差对预测油藏产量的影响。作为测试用例,具有已知特征的油藏的模拟生产结果被认为是实际流量值。然后,分别对流量施加5%和10%的误差,生成两组数据,并将结果值用于历史匹配练习,以修正同一储层的错误孔隙度和渗透率参数的模拟预测。第一组和第二组数据中的误差分别被认为在规范范围内和不在规范范围内。结果表明,当误差在规范范围内时,修正后的孔隙度和渗透率误差分别小于2.2%和2.5%,导致生产预测偏差较小,误差可达2.3%。然而,对于第二组数据,当误差增加到规范的5%以上时,校正后的孔隙度、渗透率和产量预测值与各自的参考值偏差显著,分别达到10.8%、10.1%和12.4%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ACCURATE FAST MULTIPOLE SCHEME FOR THE BOUNDARY ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF THREE-DIMENSIONAL LINEAR POTENTIAL PROBLEMS CHARACTERIZATION OF VECTOR FIELDS BASED ON AN ANALYSIS OF THEIR LOCAL EXPANSIONS FINITE LINE METHOD FOR SOLVING CONVECTION–DIFFUSION EQUATIONS IMPLICATIONS OF STOKES–CARTAN THEOREM TO TIME-HARMONIC ACOUSTIC BOUNDARY INTEGRAL EQUATION FORMULATIONS RECENT ADVANCES IN LOCALIZED COLLOCATION SOLVERS BASED ON SEMI-ANALYTICAL BASIS FUNCTIONS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1