Single Dose Bioequivalence Study of Two Rivaroxaban Tablet Formulations, Administered Orally after Being Crushed and Suspended in Apple Puree

Simona Nicoleta Duna, Adrian Ghita, Adelina Ciuciuleaca, Irene Manzanera, David Puibert, S. Rizea‐Savu
{"title":"Single Dose Bioequivalence Study of Two Rivaroxaban Tablet Formulations, Administered Orally after Being Crushed and Suspended in Apple Puree","authors":"Simona Nicoleta Duna, Adrian Ghita, Adelina Ciuciuleaca, Irene Manzanera, David Puibert, S. Rizea‐Savu","doi":"10.35248/0975-0851.19.11.388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The bioavailability of an active substance might be altered when a solid oral dosage form (SODF) is crushed or disintegrated and mixed with fluids or food in order to assist swallowing. In consequence, the current European Medicines Agency (EMA) practice is to request comparative bioavailability testing for bridging safety and efficacy data from a formulation administered whole to the same product administered crushed. Specific criteria for waiving in vivo testing of crushed products are available only for BCS Class I and Class III drugs. Since rivaroxaban is a Class II drug which can be administered crushed and mixed with fluids, any generic formulation has to be tested against the originator in this setting. Therefore, an open label, randomized, single dose, two-period, two-sequence, crossover bioequivalence study with administration of rivaroxaban 10 mg crushed tablets suspended in apple puree was conducted in 24 fasting healthy volunteers. Both rivaroxaban treatments were well tolerated by the study subjects. A standardized, dose efficient and fully reproducible protocol for grinding, mixing and administering investigational medicinal products was developed and applied. Assessment of bioequivalence was based on plasma concentrations of parent rivaroxaban, quantified using a validated HPLC/ MS/MS method. The 90% confidence intervals for Cmax and AUC0-t least square mean T/R ratios were within the bioequivalence acceptance range of 80% to 125%. Results from the present study reinforced the bioequivalence conclusion reached for the same test and reference products following administration of whole tablets in fasting state. No notable changes in bioavailability occurred when rivaroxaban tablets were crushed, immediately dispensed in 70 mL apple puree and quantitatively (entire dose recovered) administered to fasting volunteers.","PeriodicalId":15184,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bioequivalence & Bioavailability","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bioequivalence & Bioavailability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35248/0975-0851.19.11.388","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The bioavailability of an active substance might be altered when a solid oral dosage form (SODF) is crushed or disintegrated and mixed with fluids or food in order to assist swallowing. In consequence, the current European Medicines Agency (EMA) practice is to request comparative bioavailability testing for bridging safety and efficacy data from a formulation administered whole to the same product administered crushed. Specific criteria for waiving in vivo testing of crushed products are available only for BCS Class I and Class III drugs. Since rivaroxaban is a Class II drug which can be administered crushed and mixed with fluids, any generic formulation has to be tested against the originator in this setting. Therefore, an open label, randomized, single dose, two-period, two-sequence, crossover bioequivalence study with administration of rivaroxaban 10 mg crushed tablets suspended in apple puree was conducted in 24 fasting healthy volunteers. Both rivaroxaban treatments were well tolerated by the study subjects. A standardized, dose efficient and fully reproducible protocol for grinding, mixing and administering investigational medicinal products was developed and applied. Assessment of bioequivalence was based on plasma concentrations of parent rivaroxaban, quantified using a validated HPLC/ MS/MS method. The 90% confidence intervals for Cmax and AUC0-t least square mean T/R ratios were within the bioequivalence acceptance range of 80% to 125%. Results from the present study reinforced the bioequivalence conclusion reached for the same test and reference products following administration of whole tablets in fasting state. No notable changes in bioavailability occurred when rivaroxaban tablets were crushed, immediately dispensed in 70 mL apple puree and quantitatively (entire dose recovered) administered to fasting volunteers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两种利伐沙班片在苹果泥中粉碎悬浮后口服的单剂量生物等效性研究
当固体口服剂型(SODF)被压碎或分解并与液体或食物混合以辅助吞咽时,活性物质的生物利用度可能会改变。因此,目前欧洲药品管理局(EMA)的做法是要求进行比较生物利用度测试,以连接从整体给药到同一产品碾碎给药的安全性和有效性数据。放弃粉碎产品体内试验的具体标准仅适用于BCS I类和III类药物。由于利伐沙班是II类药物,可以粉碎并与液体混合使用,因此任何仿制制剂都必须在这种情况下与原研药进行对照试验。因此,在24名空腹健康志愿者中进行了一项开放标签、随机、单剂量、两期、两顺序、交叉的利伐沙班10 mg苹果泥混悬碎片生物等效性研究。研究对象对两种利伐沙班治疗均有良好的耐受性。制定并应用了标准的、剂量有效的和完全可复制的研磨、混合和给药试验药品的方案。生物等效性评估基于母体利伐沙班的血浆浓度,采用高效液相色谱/质谱/质谱法定量。Cmax和AUC0-t最小二乘平均T/R比的90%置信区间在80% ~ 125%的生物等效性可接受范围内。本研究的结果加强了同一试验品和参比品在禁食状态下服用整片后的生物等效性结论。将利伐沙班片压碎后,立即配入70ml苹果泥中,定量(全剂量回收)给空腹志愿者服用,生物利用度无明显变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Future Outlook for Biosafety and Biotechnology Effect of Fatty Acids on Bioavailability Clinical Trials of COVID-19 in China Anticipation of Castor Industry and Bottle Scruff Deviation Range to Address Genuine Bioavailability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1