Measuring the State Sector and Assessing Its Effectiveness: Approaches and Implications

IF 3.4 3区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Financial Analysts Journal Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.31107/2075-1990-2023-2-27-46
A. Abramov, A. Pershin, M. Chernova
{"title":"Measuring the State Sector and Assessing Its Effectiveness: Approaches and Implications","authors":"A. Abramov, A. Pershin, M. Chernova","doi":"10.31107/2075-1990-2023-2-27-46","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the increasing role of the state sector in the economies of many countries, the criteria and approaches to comparative analysis and evaluation of the performance of state-owned enterprises are still ambiguous, as are the methods for cross-country comparisons of the scale of state presence in the economy. The purpose of the article is to systematize the main approaches to measurement of the size of the state sector using Russian economy as an example, as well as to substantiate the significance of this information in assessing the performance of companies with different forms of ownership in the investment and managerial decision-making process. The problems of the information environment, such as the fragmentation of data, incomplete publication of company reports, and the specifics of national databases in different countries, complicate and distort empirical research. Meanwhile, there are significant differences in the performance of state-owned and private companies, as well as in their investment attractiveness to investors in the financial market. International approaches to solving these problems consist in the formation of consolidated and unified databases, inclusion of stateowned companies in the system of national accounts, and creation of guidelines on uniform principles of transparency and accessibility of financial reports. Given the growing restrictions on access to information along with the trend towards the growth of the state sector in Russia, there is an increasing need to develop a unified methodology to measure its scale and assess its impact on the economy, investment and stock market. The proposed methodology and the obtained empirical results allow not only to comprehensively assess the contribution of the state sector in creating GDP and increasing the capitalization of the stock market, but also to conduct comparative studies of performance indicators and stock returns in companies with different ownership structure, as well as an international empirical analysis of the state sector impact on the economies and the financial and economic performance of companies.","PeriodicalId":48062,"journal":{"name":"Financial Analysts Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Financial Analysts Journal","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31107/2075-1990-2023-2-27-46","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the increasing role of the state sector in the economies of many countries, the criteria and approaches to comparative analysis and evaluation of the performance of state-owned enterprises are still ambiguous, as are the methods for cross-country comparisons of the scale of state presence in the economy. The purpose of the article is to systematize the main approaches to measurement of the size of the state sector using Russian economy as an example, as well as to substantiate the significance of this information in assessing the performance of companies with different forms of ownership in the investment and managerial decision-making process. The problems of the information environment, such as the fragmentation of data, incomplete publication of company reports, and the specifics of national databases in different countries, complicate and distort empirical research. Meanwhile, there are significant differences in the performance of state-owned and private companies, as well as in their investment attractiveness to investors in the financial market. International approaches to solving these problems consist in the formation of consolidated and unified databases, inclusion of stateowned companies in the system of national accounts, and creation of guidelines on uniform principles of transparency and accessibility of financial reports. Given the growing restrictions on access to information along with the trend towards the growth of the state sector in Russia, there is an increasing need to develop a unified methodology to measure its scale and assess its impact on the economy, investment and stock market. The proposed methodology and the obtained empirical results allow not only to comprehensively assess the contribution of the state sector in creating GDP and increasing the capitalization of the stock market, but also to conduct comparative studies of performance indicators and stock returns in companies with different ownership structure, as well as an international empirical analysis of the state sector impact on the economies and the financial and economic performance of companies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
衡量国有部门和评估其有效性:方法和影响
尽管国有部门在许多国家的经济中发挥着越来越大的作用,但对国有企业绩效进行比较分析和评价的标准和方法仍然含糊不清,对国家在经济中存在的规模进行跨国比较的方法也是如此。本文的目的是将衡量国有部门规模的主要方法系统化,以俄罗斯经济为例,并证实这些信息在评估不同所有制形式的公司在投资和管理决策过程中的绩效方面的意义。信息环境的问题,如数据的碎片化,公司报告的不完整公布,以及不同国家的国家数据库的特殊性,使实证研究复杂化和扭曲。同时,在金融市场上,国有企业和民营企业的绩效以及对投资者的投资吸引力也存在显著差异。解决这些问题的国际办法包括建立综合和统一的数据基,将国有公司列入国民核算系统,以及制订关于透明度和取得财务报告的统一原则的准则。鉴于对信息获取的限制越来越多,以及俄罗斯国有部门的增长趋势,越来越需要制定一种统一的方法来衡量其规模,并评估其对经济、投资和股票市场的影响。本文提出的方法和获得的实证结果不仅可以全面评估国有部门在创造GDP和增加股票市场资本化方面的贡献,还可以对不同股权结构公司的绩效指标和股票回报进行比较研究,并对国有部门对经济以及公司财务和经济绩效的影响进行国际实证分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Financial Analysts Journal
Financial Analysts Journal BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The Financial Analysts Journal aims to be the leading practitioner journal in the investment management community by advancing the knowledge and understanding of the practice of investment management through the publication of rigorous, peer-reviewed, practitioner-relevant research from leading academics and practitioners.
期刊最新文献
Choices Matter When Training Machine Learning Models for Return Prediction The Importance of Joining Lifecycle Models with Mean-Variance Optimization Transaction Costs and Capacity of Systematic Corporate Bond Strategies Predicting Corporate Bond Illiquidity via Machine Learning Nonlinear Factor Returns in the US Equity Market
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1