Metrics for Success: Strategies for Enabling Core Facility Performance and Assessing Outcomes.

P. Turpen, P. Hockberger, Susan M. Meyn, Connie Nicklin, D. Tabarini, J. Auger
{"title":"Metrics for Success: Strategies for Enabling Core Facility Performance and Assessing Outcomes.","authors":"P. Turpen, P. Hockberger, Susan M. Meyn, Connie Nicklin, D. Tabarini, J. Auger","doi":"10.7171/jbt.16-2701-001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Core Facilities are key elements in the research portfolio of academic and private research institutions. Administrators overseeing core facilities (core administrators) require assessment tools for evaluating the need and effectiveness of these facilities at their institutions. This article discusses ways to promote best practices in core facilities as well as ways to evaluate their performance across 8 of the following categories: general management, research and technical staff, financial management, customer base and satisfaction, resource management, communications, institutional impact, and strategic planning. For each category, we provide lessons learned that we believe contribute to the effective and efficient overall management of core facilities. If done well, we believe that encouraging best practices and evaluating performance in core facilities will demonstrate and reinforce the importance of core facilities in the research and educational mission of institutions. It will also increase job satisfaction of those working in core facilities and improve the likelihood of sustainability of both facilities and personnel.","PeriodicalId":94326,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomolecular techniques : JBT","volume":"4 1","pages":"25-39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomolecular techniques : JBT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7171/jbt.16-2701-001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Core Facilities are key elements in the research portfolio of academic and private research institutions. Administrators overseeing core facilities (core administrators) require assessment tools for evaluating the need and effectiveness of these facilities at their institutions. This article discusses ways to promote best practices in core facilities as well as ways to evaluate their performance across 8 of the following categories: general management, research and technical staff, financial management, customer base and satisfaction, resource management, communications, institutional impact, and strategic planning. For each category, we provide lessons learned that we believe contribute to the effective and efficient overall management of core facilities. If done well, we believe that encouraging best practices and evaluating performance in core facilities will demonstrate and reinforce the importance of core facilities in the research and educational mission of institutions. It will also increase job satisfaction of those working in core facilities and improve the likelihood of sustainability of both facilities and personnel.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成功的衡量标准:实现核心设施绩效和评估结果的战略。
核心设施是学术和私人研究机构研究组合的关键要素。监督核心设施的管理员(核心管理员)需要评估工具来评估其机构中这些设施的需求和有效性。本文讨论了在核心设施中推广最佳实践的方法,以及在以下8个类别中评估其绩效的方法:一般管理、研究和技术人员、财务管理、客户基础和满意度、资源管理、通信、机构影响和战略规划。对于每个类别,我们都提供了我们认为有助于有效和高效地全面管理核心设施的经验教训。我们相信,如果工作做得好,鼓励最佳做法和评估核心设施的表现,将展示和加强核心设施在院校研究和教育使命中的重要性。它还将提高在核心设施工作的人员的工作满意度,并提高设施和人员可持续性的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Article Watch: July, 2024. Improved Yield of SPRI Beads-Based Size Selection in the Very High Molecular Weight Range. Protein Expression Autoinduction in a Cold-Shock Expression System in Escherichia coli. Article Watch: April, 2024. Core Exchange: A Professional Development Program for Shared Resource Personnel.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1