Sound frequency analysis and the site of snoring in natural and induced sleep.

S. Agrawal, P. Stone, K. Mcguinness, J. Morris, A. Camilleri
{"title":"Sound frequency analysis and the site of snoring in natural and induced sleep.","authors":"S. Agrawal, P. Stone, K. Mcguinness, J. Morris, A. Camilleri","doi":"10.1046/J.1365-2273.2002.00554.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was to compare the snoring sounds induced during sleep nasendoscopy, and to compare them with those of natural sleep using sound frequency spectra. The snoring of 16 subjects was digitally recorded during natural and induced sleep, noting the site of vibration during sleep nasendoscopy. Patients with palatal snoring during sleep nasendoscopy had a median peak frequency at 137 Hz (118 snore samples). The peak frequency of tongue-base snoring was 1243 Hz (10 snore samples), and simultaneous palate and tongue was 190 Hz (six snore samples). The median power ratios were 7, 0.2 and 5 respectively. The centre frequencies were 371, 1094 and 404 Hz respectively. Epiglottic snores had a peak frequency of 490 Hz (five snore samples). Comparison of the induced (n = 118) and natural (n = 300) snore samples of the 12 palatal snorers showed a significant difference in both the power ratio and centre frequencies (P = 0.031 and P = 0.049). The peak frequency position was similar (P = 0.34). Our results indicate that induced snores contain a higher frequency component of sound, not evident during natural snoring. This is consistent with an element of tongue-base snoring. Although there is good correlation generally, sleep nasendoscopy may not accurately reflect natural snoring.","PeriodicalId":10694,"journal":{"name":"Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences","volume":"4 1","pages":"162-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"123","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1365-2273.2002.00554.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 123

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the snoring sounds induced during sleep nasendoscopy, and to compare them with those of natural sleep using sound frequency spectra. The snoring of 16 subjects was digitally recorded during natural and induced sleep, noting the site of vibration during sleep nasendoscopy. Patients with palatal snoring during sleep nasendoscopy had a median peak frequency at 137 Hz (118 snore samples). The peak frequency of tongue-base snoring was 1243 Hz (10 snore samples), and simultaneous palate and tongue was 190 Hz (six snore samples). The median power ratios were 7, 0.2 and 5 respectively. The centre frequencies were 371, 1094 and 404 Hz respectively. Epiglottic snores had a peak frequency of 490 Hz (five snore samples). Comparison of the induced (n = 118) and natural (n = 300) snore samples of the 12 palatal snorers showed a significant difference in both the power ratio and centre frequencies (P = 0.031 and P = 0.049). The peak frequency position was similar (P = 0.34). Our results indicate that induced snores contain a higher frequency component of sound, not evident during natural snoring. This is consistent with an element of tongue-base snoring. Although there is good correlation generally, sleep nasendoscopy may not accurately reflect natural snoring.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自然睡眠和诱发睡眠中打鼾部位的声频分析。
本研究的目的是比较睡眠时鼻内窥镜诱发的鼾声,并将其与自然睡眠时的鼾声进行频谱比较。16名受试者在自然睡眠和诱导睡眠时的打鼾被数字记录下来,并记录下睡眠时鼻腔内窥镜检查时的振动部位。睡眠鼻内镜检查时腭部打鼾患者的中位峰值频率为137 Hz(118个打鼾样本)。舌底打鼾的峰值频率为1243 Hz(10个打鼾样本),上颚和舌头同时打鼾的峰值频率为190 Hz(6个打鼾样本)。中位功率比分别为7、0.2和5。中心频率分别为371、1094和404 Hz。会厌打鼾的峰值频率为490 Hz(5个打鼾样本)。12例上颚打鼾者的诱导打鼾(118例)与自然打鼾(300例)的比较,其功率比和中心频率均有显著性差异(P = 0.031和P = 0.049)。峰频位置相似(P = 0.34)。我们的研究结果表明,诱发打鼾含有更高频率的声音成分,而在自然打鼾中并不明显。这与舌底打鼾的成分是一致的。虽然有良好的相关性,但睡眠鼻内窥镜检查可能不能准确反映自然打鼾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Integrity in medical research and publication. The Epley manoeuvre for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo--a systematic review. Combating bacterial resistance in otorhinolaryngology. 11Beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase 1 expression in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck. Sudden deafness: long-term follow-up and recurrence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1