Social Referral Programs for Freemium Platforms

Manag. Sci. Pub Date : 2022-04-05 DOI:10.1287/mnsc.2022.4301
Rodrigo Belo, Ting Li
{"title":"Social Referral Programs for Freemium Platforms","authors":"Rodrigo Belo, Ting Li","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.2022.4301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We examine how freemium platforms can design social referral programs to encourage growth and engagement without sacrificing revenue. On the one hand, social referral programs generate new referrals from users who would not have paid for the premium features. On the other hand, they also attract new referrals from users who would have paid but prefer to invite others, resulting in more referrals but fewer paying users. We use data from a large-scale randomized field experiment in an online dating platform to assess the effects of adding referrals programs to freemium platforms and changing the referral requirements on users’ behavior, namely, on their decisions to invite, pay, and engage with the platform. We find that introducing referral programs in freemium platforms can significantly contribute to increasing the number of referrals at the expense of revenue. Platforms can avoid the loss in revenue by reserving some premium features exclusively for paying users. We also find that increasing referral requirements in social referral programs can work as a double-edged sword. Increasing the referral threshold results in more referrals and higher total revenue. Yet these benefits appear to come at a cost. Users become less engaged, decreasing the value of the platform for all users. We explore two mechanisms that help to explain the differences in users’ social engagement. Finally, and contrary to prior findings, we find that the quality of the referrals is not affected by the referral requirements. We discuss the theoretical and practical implications of our research. This paper was accepted by Chris Forman, information systems.","PeriodicalId":18208,"journal":{"name":"Manag. Sci.","volume":"34 7 1","pages":"8933-8962"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manag. Sci.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

We examine how freemium platforms can design social referral programs to encourage growth and engagement without sacrificing revenue. On the one hand, social referral programs generate new referrals from users who would not have paid for the premium features. On the other hand, they also attract new referrals from users who would have paid but prefer to invite others, resulting in more referrals but fewer paying users. We use data from a large-scale randomized field experiment in an online dating platform to assess the effects of adding referrals programs to freemium platforms and changing the referral requirements on users’ behavior, namely, on their decisions to invite, pay, and engage with the platform. We find that introducing referral programs in freemium platforms can significantly contribute to increasing the number of referrals at the expense of revenue. Platforms can avoid the loss in revenue by reserving some premium features exclusively for paying users. We also find that increasing referral requirements in social referral programs can work as a double-edged sword. Increasing the referral threshold results in more referrals and higher total revenue. Yet these benefits appear to come at a cost. Users become less engaged, decreasing the value of the platform for all users. We explore two mechanisms that help to explain the differences in users’ social engagement. Finally, and contrary to prior findings, we find that the quality of the referrals is not affected by the referral requirements. We discuss the theoretical and practical implications of our research. This paper was accepted by Chris Forman, information systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
免费平台的社交推荐计划
我们研究了免费增值平台如何设计社交推荐计划,在不牺牲收益的情况下促进增长和用户粘性。一方面,社交推荐程序从那些不愿为高级功能付费的用户那里获得新的推荐。另一方面,他们也会从那些愿意付费但更愿意邀请其他人的用户那里吸引新的推荐,从而导致更多的推荐,但更少的付费用户。我们使用来自在线约会平台的大规模随机现场实验的数据来评估在免费增值平台上添加推荐计划和改变推荐要求对用户行为的影响,即对他们邀请、付费和参与平台的决定的影响。我们发现,在免费增值平台中引入推荐计划能够以牺牲收益为代价显著提高推荐数量。平台可以通过为付费用户保留一些高级功能来避免收益损失。我们还发现,在社会推荐项目中增加推荐要求是一把双刃剑。提高推荐门槛会带来更多的推荐和更高的总收入。然而,这些好处似乎是有代价的。用户参与度降低,降低了平台对所有用户的价值。我们探讨了两种有助于解释用户社交参与差异的机制。最后,与之前的研究结果相反,我们发现转诊的质量不受转诊要求的影响。我们讨论了我们研究的理论和实践意义。这篇论文被信息系统的Chris Forman接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Disclosure in Incentivized Reviews: Does It Protect Consumers? Can Blockchain Technology Help Overcome Contractual Incompleteness? Evidence from State Laws Utility Tokens, Network Effects, and Pricing Power Decentralized Platforms: Governance, Tokenomics, and ICO Design The Conceptual Flaws of Decentralized Automated Market Making
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1