Employees’ connectedness to executives predicts job attitudes and quitting

Patrick Gallagher, Stephen Christian Smith, S. Swavely, Sarah Coley
{"title":"Employees’ connectedness to executives predicts job attitudes and quitting","authors":"Patrick Gallagher, Stephen Christian Smith, S. Swavely, Sarah Coley","doi":"10.1108/joepp-03-2022-0076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeAgainst the backdrop of a competitive hiring market and historically high rates of quitting, the current research examines a factor that could support talent retention in organizations: employees’ feelings of connectedness to their top executives. The authors examined the relationship between workers’ feelings of executive connectedness and job attitudes relative to other antecedents and its predictive power for quitting over and above manager and team connectedness.Design/methodology/approachIn Study 1, the authors measured the relative predictive power of executive connectedness, along with 14 other antecedents, for the outcome of job attitudes in ten samples totaling over 70,000 observations, including two longitudinal samples. In Study 2, the authors used path analysis to test the relationship between executive connectedness and actual quitting, controlling for workers’ feelings of connectedness to their manager and teammates, in two (related) longitudinal samples.FindingsExecutive connectedness was robustly related to concurrent and future job attitudes, and it outranked manager variables in all samples. Executive connectedness predicted quitting, even when controlling for manager and team connectedness; this effect was mediated by job attitudes in one of two samples.Practical implicationsExecutive connectedness could be an underutilized resource for understanding and possibly improving employee attitudes and retention. Executives should not delegate all responsibility for employee attitudes and retention to managers.Originality/valueThis research is to the authors' knowledge the first to systematically test the unique predictive validity of employees’ feelings of connectedness to executives for important outcomes. The results suggest that executive connectedness may be an important factor in employees’ workplace experience.","PeriodicalId":51810,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Organizational Effectiveness-People and Performance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Organizational Effectiveness-People and Performance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/joepp-03-2022-0076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeAgainst the backdrop of a competitive hiring market and historically high rates of quitting, the current research examines a factor that could support talent retention in organizations: employees’ feelings of connectedness to their top executives. The authors examined the relationship between workers’ feelings of executive connectedness and job attitudes relative to other antecedents and its predictive power for quitting over and above manager and team connectedness.Design/methodology/approachIn Study 1, the authors measured the relative predictive power of executive connectedness, along with 14 other antecedents, for the outcome of job attitudes in ten samples totaling over 70,000 observations, including two longitudinal samples. In Study 2, the authors used path analysis to test the relationship between executive connectedness and actual quitting, controlling for workers’ feelings of connectedness to their manager and teammates, in two (related) longitudinal samples.FindingsExecutive connectedness was robustly related to concurrent and future job attitudes, and it outranked manager variables in all samples. Executive connectedness predicted quitting, even when controlling for manager and team connectedness; this effect was mediated by job attitudes in one of two samples.Practical implicationsExecutive connectedness could be an underutilized resource for understanding and possibly improving employee attitudes and retention. Executives should not delegate all responsibility for employee attitudes and retention to managers.Originality/valueThis research is to the authors' knowledge the first to systematically test the unique predictive validity of employees’ feelings of connectedness to executives for important outcomes. The results suggest that executive connectedness may be an important factor in employees’ workplace experience.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
员工与高管的联系预示着工作态度和辞职
在竞争激烈的招聘市场和历史上高离职率的背景下,当前的研究考察了一个可能支持组织中人才保留的因素:员工与高管的联系感。作者研究了员工对高管联系的感觉和相对于其他前因的工作态度之间的关系,以及它对辞职的预测能力,而不是对经理和团队联系的预测能力。设计/方法/方法在研究1中,作者测量了执行连通性的相对预测能力,以及其他14个前因,在10个样本中,包括两个纵向样本,总共超过70,000个观察结果。在研究2中,作者在两个(相关的)纵向样本中,使用路径分析来测试高管联系与实际辞职之间的关系,控制员工与经理和队友的联系感。研究发现,高管连通性与当前和未来的工作态度密切相关,并且在所有样本中都高于经理变量。高管连通性预测辞职,即使在控制了经理和团队连通性的情况下也是如此;在两个样本中,其中一个样本的工作态度介导了这种效应。实际意义在理解和可能改善员工态度和保留方面,高管连通性可能是一种未充分利用的资源。主管不应该把员工态度和保留的责任都委托给经理。原创性/价值据作者所知,这项研究首次系统地测试了员工与高管的联系感对重要结果的独特预测有效性。研究结果表明,高管联系可能是影响员工职场体验的一个重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
31
期刊最新文献
The effects of working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic on work–life balance, work–family conflict and employee burnout Climate of fear and job apathy as fallout of supervisory nonphysical hostility toward casual workers in the banking industry Agile work practices and team creativity: the mediating role of team efficacy Performance management systems in a shared service centre: an exploration of organisational injustice Leaders' Machiavellianism and subordinates' task performance: a multilevel investigation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1