The Analysis of Legal Evidence Case on Criminal Employment through Electronic Systems

Q2 Social Sciences Law Environment and Development Journal Pub Date : 2022-05-05 DOI:10.30659/ldj.4.1.33-41
Somaerin Saputra, Anis Mashdurohatun., Latifah Hanim
{"title":"The Analysis of Legal Evidence Case on Criminal Employment through Electronic Systems","authors":"Somaerin Saputra, Anis Mashdurohatun., Latifah Hanim","doi":"10.30659/ldj.4.1.33-41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to find out and analyze legal evidence related to criminal acts of embezzlement through an electronic system. To find out and analyze the basis of judges' considerations in making decisions on criminal acts of embezzlement through an electronic system. The method used by the researcher is empirical juridical approach and the specifications in this study include descriptive analysis. As for the sources and types of data in this study, secondary data were obtained from literature studies. Data analyzed qualitatively. Based on the results of the study that Legal Evidence Regarding the Crime of Embezzlement Through Electronic Systems that the power of proving electronic evidence in criminal procedural law, the strength of all evidence is essentially the same, no one exceeds the other. Evidence in criminal procedural law does not recognize hierarchy. It's just that there are provisions that require the connection between one evidence and another. Therefore, in criminal procedural law there is complementary evidence.","PeriodicalId":55646,"journal":{"name":"Law Environment and Development Journal","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law Environment and Development Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30659/ldj.4.1.33-41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to find out and analyze legal evidence related to criminal acts of embezzlement through an electronic system. To find out and analyze the basis of judges' considerations in making decisions on criminal acts of embezzlement through an electronic system. The method used by the researcher is empirical juridical approach and the specifications in this study include descriptive analysis. As for the sources and types of data in this study, secondary data were obtained from literature studies. Data analyzed qualitatively. Based on the results of the study that Legal Evidence Regarding the Crime of Embezzlement Through Electronic Systems that the power of proving electronic evidence in criminal procedural law, the strength of all evidence is essentially the same, no one exceeds the other. Evidence in criminal procedural law does not recognize hierarchy. It's just that there are provisions that require the connection between one evidence and another. Therefore, in criminal procedural law there is complementary evidence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用电子系统分析刑事雇佣法律证据案件
本研究的目的在于透过电子系统找出与贪污犯罪行为相关的法律证据,并加以分析。通过电子系统找出并分析法官在对贪污犯罪行为作出判决时的考虑依据。研究者使用的方法是实证法学方法,本研究的规范包括描述性分析。关于本研究的数据来源和类型,二手数据来源于文献研究。数据进行定性分析。基于对电子系统贪污罪法律证据的研究结果表明,刑事诉讼法中电子证据的举证权,所有证据的强度本质上是相同的,没有谁比谁强。刑事诉讼法中的证据不承认等级。只是有些条款要求证据之间的联系。因此,刑事诉讼法中存在补充证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Juridical Analysis in Viewing the Position of Reported Revocation of Complaints A General Criminal One Party by the Reporter in Investigation Process The Criminological Ideas in the Criminal Enforcement of Illegal Logging The Criminal Policy in Efforts to Overcome Crimes Perpetrated by the Indonesian National Army An Investigator's Discretion in State Assets Confiscation Criminal Action Case of Corruption The Legal Protection for Children as Criminal Actors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1