Three-Phase Carbonate Acidizing: Quantification and Analysis of Evolved CO2 in the Presence of Oil and Water

H. Kumar, Sajjaat Muhemmed, H. Nasr-El-Din
{"title":"Three-Phase Carbonate Acidizing: Quantification and Analysis of Evolved CO2 in the Presence of Oil and Water","authors":"H. Kumar, Sajjaat Muhemmed, H. Nasr-El-Din","doi":"10.2118/193617-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Recent times have seen an advancement in the area of carbonate acidizing, moving forward from single-phase to two-phase analyses, in an effort to account for the presence of the oil-phase during stimulation treatments. Yet, a lack of a complete capability to understand this complex subsurface process still exists. Characterizing the effect of CO2 (carbon dioxide), a byproduct of the chemical reaction between carbonates & HCl (hydrochloric acid) has been ignored till date, under the pretext of using high pore pressures to keep CO2 dissolved in surrounding solution. The presence of CO2 in porous media changes the dynamics of fluid flow.\n A three-phase two-scale simulation model is described toward the purpose of accurately modeling the physics of carbonate acidizing. A validation of the model, is conducted using published literature experiments and conducted laboratory corefloods in the area of carbonate acidizing. The acid efficiency curve for a single phase scenario from literature is matched, with the effects of the evolved CO2 being modeled. Two Indiana limestone core, 6 in. by length and 1.5 in. by diameter, are used for the purpose of a tracer injection study using 5 wt% KCl (potassium chloride) solution, and acid injection study using 15 wt% HCl solution. The experiments were conducted at 71.6°F, and 1,180 psi pore pressures. The Indiana limestone cores are characterized via CT (computed tomography) scans, and a detailed, accurate porosity profile of the core is used as input to the simulation model. The tracer fluid was used to characterize the porous environment and effective dispersion coefficients, and for subsequent calibration of the simulation model. From the conducted single phase acidizing coreflood, the experimental parameters such as pressure drop curves are closely monitored to assess acid breakthrough, and the effluents from the acid coreflood are analyzed for determining the concentrations of CaCl2 (calcium chloride) and HCl with time. CT scans of the core post acidizing describes the wormhole pattern. These parameters are accurately matched using the simulation model, and subsequent sensitivity studies with the presence of oil are performed thereof.\n The modeling of CO2 as a separate phase for mimicking the acid coreflood played a major role in acquiring a better match with all experimental parameters, with limited dependency on empirical pore-scale parameters. It is shown that the rock-wettability for an oil-water system has a large degree of influence on the acid PVbt (pore volumes of acid required to breakthrough), with oil-wet systems requiring higher volumes. An approximate of 30% recovery of the residual oil in place is predicted, purely based on capability of the evolved CO2 to swell the surrounding oil.","PeriodicalId":11243,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, April 09, 2019","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, April 09, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/193617-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Recent times have seen an advancement in the area of carbonate acidizing, moving forward from single-phase to two-phase analyses, in an effort to account for the presence of the oil-phase during stimulation treatments. Yet, a lack of a complete capability to understand this complex subsurface process still exists. Characterizing the effect of CO2 (carbon dioxide), a byproduct of the chemical reaction between carbonates & HCl (hydrochloric acid) has been ignored till date, under the pretext of using high pore pressures to keep CO2 dissolved in surrounding solution. The presence of CO2 in porous media changes the dynamics of fluid flow. A three-phase two-scale simulation model is described toward the purpose of accurately modeling the physics of carbonate acidizing. A validation of the model, is conducted using published literature experiments and conducted laboratory corefloods in the area of carbonate acidizing. The acid efficiency curve for a single phase scenario from literature is matched, with the effects of the evolved CO2 being modeled. Two Indiana limestone core, 6 in. by length and 1.5 in. by diameter, are used for the purpose of a tracer injection study using 5 wt% KCl (potassium chloride) solution, and acid injection study using 15 wt% HCl solution. The experiments were conducted at 71.6°F, and 1,180 psi pore pressures. The Indiana limestone cores are characterized via CT (computed tomography) scans, and a detailed, accurate porosity profile of the core is used as input to the simulation model. The tracer fluid was used to characterize the porous environment and effective dispersion coefficients, and for subsequent calibration of the simulation model. From the conducted single phase acidizing coreflood, the experimental parameters such as pressure drop curves are closely monitored to assess acid breakthrough, and the effluents from the acid coreflood are analyzed for determining the concentrations of CaCl2 (calcium chloride) and HCl with time. CT scans of the core post acidizing describes the wormhole pattern. These parameters are accurately matched using the simulation model, and subsequent sensitivity studies with the presence of oil are performed thereof. The modeling of CO2 as a separate phase for mimicking the acid coreflood played a major role in acquiring a better match with all experimental parameters, with limited dependency on empirical pore-scale parameters. It is shown that the rock-wettability for an oil-water system has a large degree of influence on the acid PVbt (pore volumes of acid required to breakthrough), with oil-wet systems requiring higher volumes. An approximate of 30% recovery of the residual oil in place is predicted, purely based on capability of the evolved CO2 to swell the surrounding oil.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三相碳酸盐酸化:在油和水的存在下析出的CO2的定量和分析
近年来,在碳酸盐岩酸化领域取得了进步,从单相分析发展到两相分析,努力解释增产处理过程中油相的存在。然而,目前仍缺乏完整的能力来理解这一复杂的地下过程。CO2(二氧化碳)是碳酸盐与盐酸化学反应的副产物,迄今为止,人们一直以利用高孔隙压力使CO2溶解在周围溶液中为借口,而忽略了CO2(二氧化碳)的影响特征。多孔介质中CO2的存在改变了流体的流动动力学。为了准确地模拟碳酸盐岩酸化的物理过程,建立了三相双尺度模拟模型。利用已发表的文献实验和在碳酸盐岩酸化区域进行的实验室岩心驱油对该模型进行了验证。从文献中得到的单相情景的酸效率曲线与进化的CO2的影响相匹配。两个印第安纳石灰石岩心,6英寸。长度和1.5英寸。用5 wt% KCl(氯化钾)溶液进行示踪剂注射研究,用15 wt% HCl溶液进行酸注射研究。实验温度为71.6°F,孔隙压力为1180 psi。通过CT(计算机断层扫描)对印第安纳石灰岩岩心进行了表征,并将岩心的详细、准确的孔隙度剖面用作模拟模型的输入。示踪液用于表征多孔环境和有效分散系数,并用于随后的模拟模型校准。在进行的单相酸化岩心驱油中,密切监测压降曲线等实验参数,以评估酸侵情况,并对酸性岩心驱油流出物进行分析,以确定CaCl2(氯化钙)和HCl浓度随时间的变化。岩心酸化后的CT扫描描述了虫洞模式。利用模拟模型对这些参数进行了精确匹配,并进行了后续的油存在敏感性研究。将CO2作为一个单独的相来模拟酸性岩心驱油,在获得与所有实验参数的更好匹配方面发挥了重要作用,对经验孔隙尺度参数的依赖有限。研究表明,油水体系的岩石润湿性对酸性PVbt(突破所需的酸的孔隙体积)有很大的影响,而油湿体系对孔隙体积的要求更高。仅根据二氧化碳对周围石油的膨胀能力,预计剩余油的采收率约为30%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development of a Barium Sulphate Scale Inhibitor for Chalk Solid Loaded Conditions Novel Laser-Hydrothermal Apparatus for Nucleation and Inhibition Study of Scale Minerals at Temperatures up to 250°C Effect of Corrosion–Inhibitor Chemistry on the Viscosity and Corrosion Rate of VES-Based Acids What Can We Learn from Analysis of Field Asphaltenes Deposits? Enhancing Product Development Through Knowledge-Based Field-to-Lab-to-Field Approach Novel Non-Aromatic Non-Ionic Surfactants to Target Deep Carbonate Stimulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1