A Mixed-Methods Study of Knowledge, Belief, and Practice Regarding Project-Based Learning of English Lecturers: A Case Study of a University in Thailand

Q4 Arts and Humanities Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal Pub Date : 2023-08-10 DOI:10.5539/elt.v16n9p27
Ratanawalee Wimolmas, Kittitouch Soontornwipast
{"title":"A Mixed-Methods Study of Knowledge, Belief, and Practice Regarding Project-Based Learning of English Lecturers: A Case Study of a University in Thailand","authors":"Ratanawalee Wimolmas, Kittitouch Soontornwipast","doi":"10.5539/elt.v16n9p27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The application of project-based learning (PBL) in English class has been growing in the Thai educational setting. However, a body of literature has revealed problems regarding Thai EFL teachers and their use of PBL. Hence, this convergent mixed methods research study aimed to quantitatively and qualitatively study the relationship among English teachers’ PBL knowledge, belief, and practice in the Thai university context. A total of 52 Thai EFL teachers from a language institute of an autonomous university participated in this study. All of them were asked to complete a PBL knowledge test and a questionnaire on PBL belief and practice. Subsequently, non-participatory observations and follow-up interviews were conducted to capture in-depth information on the beliefs and practices of 15 participants. Thematic analysis was used to analyze qualitative data, whereas frequency, mean, standard deviation, Pearson’s product moment correlation, and multiple regression were used to analyze quantitative data. \n \nThe findings revealed glaring inconsistencies in participants’ knowledge, belief, and practice. Comprehensive knowledge of PBL was witnessed in the knowledge test. Positive belief about PBL was also reported. However, the observations and follow-up interviews revealed a pattern of recurring problems and factors negatively affecting the in-class application of PBL. The study suggests revisiting the three elements as well as the customization of teacher professional development to solve underlying problems and enhance the congruence of belief and practice regarding PBL in the Thai context.","PeriodicalId":30319,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v16n9p27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The application of project-based learning (PBL) in English class has been growing in the Thai educational setting. However, a body of literature has revealed problems regarding Thai EFL teachers and their use of PBL. Hence, this convergent mixed methods research study aimed to quantitatively and qualitatively study the relationship among English teachers’ PBL knowledge, belief, and practice in the Thai university context. A total of 52 Thai EFL teachers from a language institute of an autonomous university participated in this study. All of them were asked to complete a PBL knowledge test and a questionnaire on PBL belief and practice. Subsequently, non-participatory observations and follow-up interviews were conducted to capture in-depth information on the beliefs and practices of 15 participants. Thematic analysis was used to analyze qualitative data, whereas frequency, mean, standard deviation, Pearson’s product moment correlation, and multiple regression were used to analyze quantitative data. The findings revealed glaring inconsistencies in participants’ knowledge, belief, and practice. Comprehensive knowledge of PBL was witnessed in the knowledge test. Positive belief about PBL was also reported. However, the observations and follow-up interviews revealed a pattern of recurring problems and factors negatively affecting the in-class application of PBL. The study suggests revisiting the three elements as well as the customization of teacher professional development to solve underlying problems and enhance the congruence of belief and practice regarding PBL in the Thai context.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于英语讲师项目学习的知识、信念和实践的混合方法研究:以泰国一所大学为例
在泰国的教育环境中,基于项目的学习(PBL)在英语课堂中的应用越来越多。然而,大量文献揭示了泰国英语教师及其使用PBL的问题。因此,本研究旨在定量和定性地研究泰国大学背景下英语教师PBL知识、信念和实践之间的关系。来自某自治大学语言学院的52名泰语教师参与了本研究。所有受试者均完成PBL知识测试和PBL信念与实践问卷。随后,进行了非参与性观察和后续访谈,以深入了解15名参与者的信仰和做法。定性数据采用主题分析,定量数据采用频率、均值、标准差、Pearson积差相关和多元回归分析。研究结果揭示了参与者在知识、信念和实践上的明显不一致。在知识测试中可以看到PBL的全面知识。对PBL的积极信念也有报道。然而,观察和随访访谈揭示了一个反复出现的问题和因素的模式,负面影响PBL在课堂上的应用。本研究建议在泰国背景下,重新审视这三个要素以及教师专业发展的定制,以解决潜在的问题,并增强PBL信念与实践的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal
Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Review of English L2 Vocabulary Learning and Teaching: Concepts, Principles, and Pedagogy Actual Usage of Machine Translation by Japanese University Students and Verification of Test Results Reviewer acknowledgements for English Language Teaching, Vol. 16, No. 11, 2023 Research on the Promotion of EAP Teachers' Information Literacy under TPACK Framework in the Era of Digital Intelligence Leveraging Artificial Intelligence (AI): Chat GPT for Effective English Language Learning among Thai Students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1