Histopathological Evaluation of GastroHepatoprotective Effect of Cassia fistula versus Naproxen in Rat Model of Rheumatoid Arthritis

Hassan Farooq
{"title":"Histopathological Evaluation of GastroHepatoprotective Effect of Cassia fistula versus\nNaproxen in Rat Model of Rheumatoid Arthritis","authors":"Hassan Farooq","doi":"10.47489/p000s334z7241-6mc","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a debilitating disease leading to incapacitation and deformity due\nto side effects of anti arthritic drugs and chronic need to use these drugs, patients often switch to and prefer\nphytotherapy. Aims & Objectives: The present study was the histopathological evaluation of gastrohepatoprotective effect of Cassia fistula compared to naproxen in rheumatoid arthritis murine model. Place\nand duration of study: This three month study was conducted at the Animal House, University of Veterinary\nand Animal Sciences, Lahore. Material & Methods: Ninety six male rats were randomly sorted into 12\ngroups (n=8). CFA injection (0.2 ml) was administered in the right hind paw of all groups except Group 1\n(negative control). Group 2 (positive control) and groups 3-7 (prophylactic groups) were administered orally\nBD on 3 consecutive days 1,2 &3, naproxen (25mg/kg), anthraquinone (250mg/kg and 500mg/kg) and\nmethanolic (250mg/kg and 500mg/kg) extracts of Cassia fistula respectively, the first dose given 30min prior\nto CFA injection .Groups 8-12 (therapeutic groups) were given naproxen, anthraquinone and methanolic\nextracts orally BD respectively in the same doses on 3 consecutive days 9, 10 and 11. On Day 15,\nhistopathology of stomach & liver was done. Results: Oral anthraquinone and methanolic extracts of Cassia\nfistula 500mg/kg vs 250mg/kg BD, in prophylactic groups normalized histology of gastric and liver tissue\nmore as compared to the therapeutic groups and to naproxen gastrohepatic damage . Conclusion: Cassia\nfistula anthraquinone and methanolic extracts exhibited greater prophylactic than therapeutic, dose dependent\ngastrohepatoprotection as compared to naproxen damage to these organs in the CFA rheumatoid arthritis rat\nmodel.\nKey words: Cassia fistula, Complete Freund’s Adjuvant (CFA), naproxen, gastrohepatoprotective","PeriodicalId":20500,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of Shaikh Zayed Medical Complex Lahore","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of Shaikh Zayed Medical Complex Lahore","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47489/p000s334z7241-6mc","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a debilitating disease leading to incapacitation and deformity due to side effects of anti arthritic drugs and chronic need to use these drugs, patients often switch to and prefer phytotherapy. Aims & Objectives: The present study was the histopathological evaluation of gastrohepatoprotective effect of Cassia fistula compared to naproxen in rheumatoid arthritis murine model. Place and duration of study: This three month study was conducted at the Animal House, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore. Material & Methods: Ninety six male rats were randomly sorted into 12 groups (n=8). CFA injection (0.2 ml) was administered in the right hind paw of all groups except Group 1 (negative control). Group 2 (positive control) and groups 3-7 (prophylactic groups) were administered orally BD on 3 consecutive days 1,2 &3, naproxen (25mg/kg), anthraquinone (250mg/kg and 500mg/kg) and methanolic (250mg/kg and 500mg/kg) extracts of Cassia fistula respectively, the first dose given 30min prior to CFA injection .Groups 8-12 (therapeutic groups) were given naproxen, anthraquinone and methanolic extracts orally BD respectively in the same doses on 3 consecutive days 9, 10 and 11. On Day 15, histopathology of stomach & liver was done. Results: Oral anthraquinone and methanolic extracts of Cassia fistula 500mg/kg vs 250mg/kg BD, in prophylactic groups normalized histology of gastric and liver tissue more as compared to the therapeutic groups and to naproxen gastrohepatic damage . Conclusion: Cassia fistula anthraquinone and methanolic extracts exhibited greater prophylactic than therapeutic, dose dependent gastrohepatoprotection as compared to naproxen damage to these organs in the CFA rheumatoid arthritis rat model. Key words: Cassia fistula, Complete Freund’s Adjuvant (CFA), naproxen, gastrohepatoprotective
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
决明子瘘与萘普生对类风湿关节炎模型大鼠胃肝保护作用的组织病理学评价
简介:类风湿性关节炎(RA)是一种衰弱性疾病,由于抗关节炎药物的副作用和慢性需要使用这些药物,导致丧失能力和畸形,患者经常转向和首选植物治疗。目的:本研究比较决明子瘘与萘普生对类风湿关节炎小鼠模型胃肝保护作用的组织病理学评价。研究地点和时间:这项为期三个月的研究在拉合尔兽医和动物科学大学动物馆进行。材料与方法:雄性大鼠96只,随机分为12组(n=8)。除1组(阴性对照)外,其余各组右后爪注射CFA注射液0.2 ml。第2组(阳性对照)和第3-7组(预防组)分别于CFA注射前30min口服萘普生(25mg/kg)、蒽醌(250mg/kg、500mg/kg)、桂花提取物(250mg/kg、500mg/kg),连续第1、2、3天口服BD;第8-12组(治疗组)分别口服萘普生、蒽醌、甲醇提取物,剂量相同,连续第9、10、11天口服。第15天进行胃、肝组织病理检查。结果:口服黑曲霉蒽醌和甲醇提取物500mg/kg vs 250mg/kg BD,预防组胃和肝组织组织学正常化程度高于治疗组,且对萘普生胃肝损害的影响明显大于治疗组。结论:在CFA类风湿性关节炎大鼠模型中,与萘普生相比,黑曲霉蒽醌和甲醇提取物对这些器官的损伤具有更大的预防作用,而不是治疗作用。关键词:决明子瘘,完全弗氏佐剂,萘普生,胃肝保护
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Anemia and the Factors Associated with it in Pregnant Women Attending Al-Sabeen Maternal and Child Hospital in Sana’a, Yemen Does Short Term Atorvastatin Treatment Improve Symptomatic Control in Patients with Mild to Moderate & Uncontrolled Asthma? Perception, Attitude & Barriers Amongst Dentists Using Digital and Electronic Technology Faculty Perception about E-Learning and Teaching Anatomy: An Experience of COVID 19 Pandemic Anti-Ulcerogenic Evaluation of Torilis Leptophylla Plant Extract on Indomethacin Induced Mice Gastric Ulcer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1