Student Perceptions of Instructional Ultrasound Videos as Preparation for a Practical Assessment

IF 1.3 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Ultrasound International Open Pub Date : 2019-11-01 DOI:10.1055/a-1024-4573
M. Altersberger, P. Pavelka, A. Sachs, Michael Weber, M. Wagner-Menghin, H. Prosch
{"title":"Student Perceptions of Instructional Ultrasound Videos as Preparation for a Practical Assessment","authors":"M. Altersberger, P. Pavelka, A. Sachs, Michael Weber, M. Wagner-Menghin, H. Prosch","doi":"10.1055/a-1024-4573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Learning ultrasound early in the medical school curriculum helps students to understand anatomy and pathology and to perform defined ultrasound standard views. Instructional videos are a potentially valuable tool for improving the process of learning ultrasound skills. It was the aim of the present study to investigate how students perceived instructional videos as a learning aid, compared to other learning opportunities, in preparation for an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE). Materials and Methods Eleven concise ultrasound videos were created and implemented in the 4th year at the Medical University of Vienna. The videos illustrate the predefined examination process, image optimization, and nine standardized ultrasound views. The videos were available to be used in preparation for the practical ultrasound examination, which was part of the objective structured clinical examination. The students’ perceptions of the instructional videos and other learning methods were surveyed using an online questionnaire. Results In total, 445 of 640 students (69.5% of the cohort) used the instructional videos. Of those students, 134 (30%) answered the questionnaire. Of this group, 88.9% rated the instructional videos as very helpful (49.6% as extremely helpful). An ANOVA revealed a significant difference between various learning materials in terms of helpfulness. Post hoc analysis showed that instructional videos were perceived as the second most helpful learning material after “self-execution and feedback.” Conclusion The study revealed that students use instructional videos frequently and appreciate them as an extra tool for effective studying.","PeriodicalId":44852,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound International Open","volume":"1 1","pages":"E81 - E88"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound International Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1024-4573","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract Background Learning ultrasound early in the medical school curriculum helps students to understand anatomy and pathology and to perform defined ultrasound standard views. Instructional videos are a potentially valuable tool for improving the process of learning ultrasound skills. It was the aim of the present study to investigate how students perceived instructional videos as a learning aid, compared to other learning opportunities, in preparation for an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE). Materials and Methods Eleven concise ultrasound videos were created and implemented in the 4th year at the Medical University of Vienna. The videos illustrate the predefined examination process, image optimization, and nine standardized ultrasound views. The videos were available to be used in preparation for the practical ultrasound examination, which was part of the objective structured clinical examination. The students’ perceptions of the instructional videos and other learning methods were surveyed using an online questionnaire. Results In total, 445 of 640 students (69.5% of the cohort) used the instructional videos. Of those students, 134 (30%) answered the questionnaire. Of this group, 88.9% rated the instructional videos as very helpful (49.6% as extremely helpful). An ANOVA revealed a significant difference between various learning materials in terms of helpfulness. Post hoc analysis showed that instructional videos were perceived as the second most helpful learning material after “self-execution and feedback.” Conclusion The study revealed that students use instructional videos frequently and appreciate them as an extra tool for effective studying.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学生对超声教学视频的认知,为实际评估做准备
背景在医学院的早期课程中学习超声有助于学生理解解剖学和病理学,并执行明确的超声标准视图。教学视频是一种潜在的有价值的工具,可以提高学习超声技术的过程。本研究的目的是调查学生在准备客观结构化临床检查(OSCE)时,与其他学习机会相比,如何将教学视频视为学习辅助工具。材料与方法在维也纳医科大学第四年制作并实施了11个简明超声视频。视频演示了预定义的检查过程、图像优化和九种标准化超声视图。视频可用于实际超声检查的准备,这是客观结构化临床检查的一部分。使用在线问卷调查学生对教学视频和其他学习方法的看法。结果640名学生中有445名(占队列的69.5%)使用了教学视频。其中134人(30%)回答了问卷。在这个群体中,88.9%的人认为教学视频非常有帮助(49.6%的人认为非常有帮助)。方差分析显示,不同学习材料在帮助性方面存在显著差异。事后分析表明,教学视频被认为是仅次于“自我执行和反馈”的第二有用的学习材料。研究表明,学生经常使用教学视频,并将其视为有效学习的额外工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ultrasound International Open
Ultrasound International Open RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Congenital coarctation of the aorta: Role of peripheral vascular ultrasound in young hypertensive patients. Lung ultrasound score for the assessment of lung aeration in ARDS patients: comparison of two approaches. Pancreatic ultrasound: An update of measurements, reference values, and variations of the pancreas. Insights Into Modern Undergraduate Ultrasound Education: Prospective Comparison of Digital and Analog Teaching Resources in a Flipped Classroom Concept - The DIvAN Study. Ultrasound elastography: a brief clinical history of an evolving technique.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1