Licensing Policy on Mineral and Coal Mining in the Concept of Division of Authority

S. Sari, Darminto Hartono Paulus
{"title":"Licensing Policy on Mineral and Coal Mining in the Concept of Division of Authority","authors":"S. Sari, Darminto Hartono Paulus","doi":"10.15294/pandecta.v17i2.31653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The mineral and coal mining licensing policy currently in force is law Number 3 of 2020 concerning Amendments to law Number 4 of 2009 concerning Mineral and Coal Mining. However, this policy is considered too centralistic because the role of the Central Government is more dominant than the Role of the Local Government. This research uses a normative approach to analyze related licensing policies in the Mineral and Coal Law in the concept of division of authority. The results show that in the provisions of the legislation, the central government has the authority to grant permits for minerals and coal mining. In contrast, local governments can obtain power through delegation from the central government. This policy tends to be centralistic, even though the Indonesian state adheres to the principle of decentralization. The government needs to consider several things, such as the policy implementation needs to pay attention to the “content of the policy” and “context of implementation.\" The government policy must follow the values held by the state and display combinations (top-down and bottom-up), balance, and integration in building good policies. ","PeriodicalId":30516,"journal":{"name":"Pandecta Research Law Journal","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pandecta Research Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v17i2.31653","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The mineral and coal mining licensing policy currently in force is law Number 3 of 2020 concerning Amendments to law Number 4 of 2009 concerning Mineral and Coal Mining. However, this policy is considered too centralistic because the role of the Central Government is more dominant than the Role of the Local Government. This research uses a normative approach to analyze related licensing policies in the Mineral and Coal Law in the concept of division of authority. The results show that in the provisions of the legislation, the central government has the authority to grant permits for minerals and coal mining. In contrast, local governments can obtain power through delegation from the central government. This policy tends to be centralistic, even though the Indonesian state adheres to the principle of decentralization. The government needs to consider several things, such as the policy implementation needs to pay attention to the “content of the policy” and “context of implementation." The government policy must follow the values held by the state and display combinations (top-down and bottom-up), balance, and integration in building good policies. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分权理念下的矿产与煤炭开采许可政策
目前生效的矿产和煤炭开采许可政策是关于对2009年关于矿产和煤炭开采的第4号法律进行修正的2020年第3号法律。然而,这一政策被认为过于集中,因为中央政府的作用比地方政府的作用更占主导地位。本研究运用规范的方法,在权力划分的概念下,对《矿产法》中的相关许可政策进行分析。结果表明,在立法规定中,中央政府具有授予矿产和煤炭开采许可证的权力。相反,地方政府可以通过中央政府的授权获得权力。这一政策倾向于中央集权,尽管印尼国家坚持分权原则。政府需要考虑几件事,比如政策执行需要注意“政策的内容”和“执行的背景”。政府的政策必须遵循国家的价值观,并在制定好的政策中表现出自上而下和自下而上的组合、平衡和整合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Implementation of Criminal Law to Determine Persons of Environmental Pollution and/or Destruction in Court Covid-19 Pandemic as Force Majeure Unable to Fulfill Obligation in Financing Agreement Social Engineering to Overcome Conflict Between People’s Markets and Supermarkets in Kulon Progo Regency (Review of Regional Regulation No. 16 of 2021) Reposition of the Promulgation for Indonesian Legislation Qualification of Child Status from Unregistered Polygamous Marriage without Marriage Validation (Study of Religious Court Decisions from 2019-2022)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1