Thabo Mbeki’s Decolonial Idea of an African in the African Renaissance

W. Mpofu
{"title":"Thabo Mbeki’s Decolonial Idea of an African in the African Renaissance","authors":"W. Mpofu","doi":"10.36615/the_thinker.v93i4.2204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this essay, I deploy a liberation philosophical perspective in order to understand Thabo Mbeki’s decolonial imagining of an African in the African Renaissance. It is my understanding that the African of the African Renaissance is one who has awakened to the task of undoing coloniality in the African postcolony. For instance, that an African has to declare that ‘I am an African’ in Africa, as Mbeki does, reflects the troubled and also troubling idea of being African in the African postcolony. It might seem that being human, and African in Africa, is an idea under question that must still be declared or defended. Whether one is an African or not in the postcolony is not a given, as colonialism succeeded in changing the being and belonging of Africans in Africa. Through colonialism, settlers became local in Africa and Africans became aliens in their own native territories. Colonialism, especially in its apartheid expression in South Africa,questioned the humanity of Black Africans, displaced them, and dispossessed them of their land. It is the uprooted, displaced, and dispossessed African represented in Mbeki who makes the remark that: ‘At times, and in fear, I have wondered whether I shouldconcede equal citizenship of our country to the leopard and the lion, the elephant and the springbok, the hyena, the black mamba and the pestilential mosquito.’ This dehumanised African is the subject who travels from the dystopia of colonialism to the utopia of reconciliation and a renaissance of Africa. This is the African who was caught in the tragic optimism of the liberation ‘dreamer’, but was later to concede that after the end of juridical colonialism, South Africa remained ‘two nations’ racially and socially. Even a globally celebrated democratic Constitution did not come close to solving the political and social equation, the paradox, where South Africaremains the ‘most unequal country in the world’. For the African of Mbeki’s representation and observation, the dream of liberation from colonialism collapsed into a nightmare of coloniality, and the starting point of an African renaissance is the decolonial effort todare dream and imagine another Africa and other Africans built from the ashes of the colonisers and the colonised. This essay is also an observation of the dilemma of a philosopher of liberation who was torn in between the necessity of justice for the victims of colonialism and the importance of reconciliation with the colonisers in the African postcolony. ","PeriodicalId":34673,"journal":{"name":"The Thinker","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Thinker","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36615/the_thinker.v93i4.2204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this essay, I deploy a liberation philosophical perspective in order to understand Thabo Mbeki’s decolonial imagining of an African in the African Renaissance. It is my understanding that the African of the African Renaissance is one who has awakened to the task of undoing coloniality in the African postcolony. For instance, that an African has to declare that ‘I am an African’ in Africa, as Mbeki does, reflects the troubled and also troubling idea of being African in the African postcolony. It might seem that being human, and African in Africa, is an idea under question that must still be declared or defended. Whether one is an African or not in the postcolony is not a given, as colonialism succeeded in changing the being and belonging of Africans in Africa. Through colonialism, settlers became local in Africa and Africans became aliens in their own native territories. Colonialism, especially in its apartheid expression in South Africa,questioned the humanity of Black Africans, displaced them, and dispossessed them of their land. It is the uprooted, displaced, and dispossessed African represented in Mbeki who makes the remark that: ‘At times, and in fear, I have wondered whether I shouldconcede equal citizenship of our country to the leopard and the lion, the elephant and the springbok, the hyena, the black mamba and the pestilential mosquito.’ This dehumanised African is the subject who travels from the dystopia of colonialism to the utopia of reconciliation and a renaissance of Africa. This is the African who was caught in the tragic optimism of the liberation ‘dreamer’, but was later to concede that after the end of juridical colonialism, South Africa remained ‘two nations’ racially and socially. Even a globally celebrated democratic Constitution did not come close to solving the political and social equation, the paradox, where South Africaremains the ‘most unequal country in the world’. For the African of Mbeki’s representation and observation, the dream of liberation from colonialism collapsed into a nightmare of coloniality, and the starting point of an African renaissance is the decolonial effort todare dream and imagine another Africa and other Africans built from the ashes of the colonisers and the colonised. This essay is also an observation of the dilemma of a philosopher of liberation who was torn in between the necessity of justice for the victims of colonialism and the importance of reconciliation with the colonisers in the African postcolony. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
姆贝基在非洲文艺复兴时期对非洲人的非殖民化思想
在这篇文章中,我运用了解放哲学的视角来理解姆贝基在非洲文艺复兴时期对非洲人的非殖民化想象。我的理解是,非洲文艺复兴时期的非洲人是一个意识到在非洲后殖民时期消除殖民主义的任务的人。例如,一个非洲人必须在非洲宣布“我是非洲人”,就像姆贝基所做的那样,这反映了在非洲后殖民地成为非洲人的困扰和令人不安的想法。作为人类,作为非洲的非洲人,似乎是一种受到质疑的想法,仍然必须宣布或捍卫。在后殖民时期,一个人是否是非洲人并不是一个既定的事实,因为殖民主义成功地改变了非洲人的存在和归属。通过殖民主义,殖民者在非洲变成了当地人,而非洲人在他们自己的土地上变成了外国人。殖民主义,特别是在南非表现出来的种族隔离,质疑非洲黑人的人性,使他们流离失所,剥夺他们的土地。姆贝基所代表的是那些背井离乡、流离失所、一无所有的非洲人,他说:“有时,在恐惧中,我想知道我是否应该把我们国家的公民权平等地给予豹子和狮子、大象和跳羚、鬣狗、黑曼巴和会传染疾病的蚊子。”“这个非人性化的非洲人是一个从殖民主义的反乌托邦到和解和非洲复兴的乌托邦的主题。这个非洲人被解放“梦想家”的悲情乐观主义所困,但后来承认,在司法殖民主义结束后,南非在种族和社会上仍然是“两个国家”。即使是一部享誉全球的民主宪法,也无法解决政治和社会的平衡,这是一个悖论,南非仍然是“世界上最不平等的国家”。对于姆贝基所代表和观察到的非洲人来说,从殖民主义中解放出来的梦想破灭为殖民主义的噩梦,非洲复兴的起点是敢于梦想和想象在殖民者和被殖民者的灰烬上建立另一个非洲和其他非洲人的非殖民主义努力。这篇文章也观察了一位解放哲学家的困境,他在为殖民主义受害者伸张正义的必要性和与非洲后殖民地殖民者和解的重要性之间徘徊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Support Services Provided by a Child and Youth Care Centre (CYCC) to Adolescent Witnesses of Domestic Violence Can vulnerability and agency co-existin the presence of violence? “Ikwekwe yinja1 (a Boy is a Dog)” Engaging the Mechanisms of Faith? Children’s Lives and Agency in the Agonistic First Century and New Testament Studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1