Hybrid Human and Machine Learning Algorithms to Forecast the European Stock Market

IF 1.7 4区 工程技术 Q2 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Complexity Pub Date : 2023-04-26 DOI:10.1155/2023/5847887
Germán G. Creamer, Yasuaki Sakamoto, Jeffrey V. Nickerson, Yong Ren
{"title":"Hybrid Human and Machine Learning Algorithms to Forecast the European Stock Market","authors":"Germán G. Creamer,&nbsp;Yasuaki Sakamoto,&nbsp;Jeffrey V. Nickerson,&nbsp;Yong Ren","doi":"10.1155/2023/5847887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>This paper explores the power of news sentiment to predict financial returns, particularly the returns of a set of European stocks. Building on past decision support work going back to the Delphi method, this paper describes a text analysis expert weighting algorithm that aggregates the responses of both humans and algorithms by dynamically selecting the best answer according to previous performance. The proposed system is tested through an experiment in which ensembles of experts, crowds, and machines analyzed Thomson Reuters news stories and predicted the returns of the relevant stocks mentioned right after the stories appeared. In most cases, the expert weighting algorithm was better than or as good as the best algorithm or human. The algorithm’s capacity to dynamically select the best answers from humans and machines results in an evolving collective intelligence: the final decision is an aggregation of the best automated individual answers, some of which come from machines and some from humans. Additionally, this paper shows that the groups of humans, algorithms, and expert weighting algorithms have associated with them, particularly, news topics that these groups are good at making predictions from.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50653,"journal":{"name":"Complexity","volume":"2023 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2023/5847887","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complexity","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2023/5847887","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper explores the power of news sentiment to predict financial returns, particularly the returns of a set of European stocks. Building on past decision support work going back to the Delphi method, this paper describes a text analysis expert weighting algorithm that aggregates the responses of both humans and algorithms by dynamically selecting the best answer according to previous performance. The proposed system is tested through an experiment in which ensembles of experts, crowds, and machines analyzed Thomson Reuters news stories and predicted the returns of the relevant stocks mentioned right after the stories appeared. In most cases, the expert weighting algorithm was better than or as good as the best algorithm or human. The algorithm’s capacity to dynamically select the best answers from humans and machines results in an evolving collective intelligence: the final decision is an aggregation of the best automated individual answers, some of which come from machines and some from humans. Additionally, this paper shows that the groups of humans, algorithms, and expert weighting algorithms have associated with them, particularly, news topics that these groups are good at making predictions from.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
混合人类和机器学习算法预测欧洲股市
本文探讨了新闻情绪预测金融回报的能力,特别是一组欧洲股票的回报。基于过去的决策支持工作可以追溯到德尔菲方法,本文描述了一种文本分析专家加权算法,该算法通过根据以前的表现动态选择最佳答案来聚合人类和算法的响应。该系统通过一项实验进行了测试,在该实验中,专家、人群和机器组合分析了汤森路透的新闻报道,并在报道出现后立即预测了相关股票的回报。在大多数情况下,专家加权算法优于或不亚于最佳算法或人。该算法动态地从人类和机器中选择最佳答案的能力导致了一种不断进化的集体智能:最终的决策是最佳自动化个人答案的集合,其中一些来自机器,一些来自人类。此外,本文还显示了人类群体、算法和专家加权算法与它们相关联,特别是这些群体擅长做出预测的新闻主题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Complexity
Complexity 综合性期刊-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
595
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Complexity is a cross-disciplinary journal focusing on the rapidly expanding science of complex adaptive systems. The purpose of the journal is to advance the science of complexity. Articles may deal with such methodological themes as chaos, genetic algorithms, cellular automata, neural networks, and evolutionary game theory. Papers treating applications in any area of natural science or human endeavor are welcome, and especially encouraged are papers integrating conceptual themes and applications that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. Complexity is not meant to serve as a forum for speculation and vague analogies between words like “chaos,” “self-organization,” and “emergence” that are often used in completely different ways in science and in daily life.
期刊最新文献
Bilevel Network Modeling and Risk Transmission in Heterogeneous Financial Data Incorporating Memory Effects in Population Ecology Using Fractional Derivatives: Stability Perspectives, Bifurcations, and Chaos Control The General Biological Relativity Theory and Multiscale Modeling of Living Systems as Complex Systems Text Classification of Multiple Datasets Based on Multidimensional Information Effects of Alumina–Tantalum Hybrid Nanofragment on Engine Oil Flow Using a New Local Thermal Nonequilibrium Formulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1