Tooth size discrepancy in different malocclusion groups in Libya: a pilot study

Fatma Elsheikhi, I. Bugaighis, T. Hamed
{"title":"Tooth size discrepancy in different malocclusion groups in Libya: a pilot study","authors":"Fatma Elsheikhi, I. Bugaighis, T. Hamed","doi":"10.21502/LIMUJ.012.02.2017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Orthodontists need to evaluate intermaxillary tooth size discrepancy (TSD) prior to initiating treatment in order to achieve a stable treatment. Thus, the aim of the present study was to determine the prevalence of TSD in Libyan subjects among different malocclusion groups. Methods: A sample of 60 dental casts of Libyan subjects with different types of malocclusions (Class I, Class II div 1 and Class III) were included in the study. Each malocclusion group (20 dental casts) included equal numbers of males and females, 12-17 years of age. Mesio-Distal tooth measurements were extracted to compute the anterior and overall TSD ratios. Paired Student t-test was used to detect significant discrepancies between the paired teeth measurements. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Tukey Honestly tests were undertaken to detect significant discrepancies among the malocclusion groups. Results: Paired t-test revealed that there were no significant discrepancies between the paired tooth widths except for the upper first molars, upper first premolars, lower lateral incisors and lower canines (P<0.010). ANOVA found no significant differences in the mean anterior TSD ratio in regard to malocclusion groups. However, a significant disparity was noticed in the mean overall TSD ratio among the different malocclusion categories (P<0.04). Conclusion: Statistically significant TSD between the examined malocclusion groups were observed only in the mean overall TSD ratio.","PeriodicalId":18106,"journal":{"name":"Libyan International Medical University Journal","volume":"32 1","pages":"92 - 100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Libyan International Medical University Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21502/LIMUJ.012.02.2017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Orthodontists need to evaluate intermaxillary tooth size discrepancy (TSD) prior to initiating treatment in order to achieve a stable treatment. Thus, the aim of the present study was to determine the prevalence of TSD in Libyan subjects among different malocclusion groups. Methods: A sample of 60 dental casts of Libyan subjects with different types of malocclusions (Class I, Class II div 1 and Class III) were included in the study. Each malocclusion group (20 dental casts) included equal numbers of males and females, 12-17 years of age. Mesio-Distal tooth measurements were extracted to compute the anterior and overall TSD ratios. Paired Student t-test was used to detect significant discrepancies between the paired teeth measurements. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Tukey Honestly tests were undertaken to detect significant discrepancies among the malocclusion groups. Results: Paired t-test revealed that there were no significant discrepancies between the paired tooth widths except for the upper first molars, upper first premolars, lower lateral incisors and lower canines (P<0.010). ANOVA found no significant differences in the mean anterior TSD ratio in regard to malocclusion groups. However, a significant disparity was noticed in the mean overall TSD ratio among the different malocclusion categories (P<0.04). Conclusion: Statistically significant TSD between the examined malocclusion groups were observed only in the mean overall TSD ratio.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利比亚不同错颌组的牙齿大小差异:一项初步研究
背景:正畸医师在开始治疗前需要评估上颌间牙大小差异(TSD),以获得稳定的治疗。因此,本研究的目的是确定利比亚受试者在不同错牙合组中的TSD患病率。方法:选取利比亚人不同类型错颌(ⅰ类、ⅱ类、ⅰ类、ⅲ类)牙模60例进行研究。每个错牙合组(20个牙模)男女人数相等,年龄12-17岁。提取中远端牙齿测量值以计算前牙和整体TSD比率。配对学生t检验用于检测配对牙齿测量值之间的显著差异。采用方差分析(ANOVA)和Tukey honest检验来检测错牙合组间的显著差异。结果:配对t检验显示,除上颌第一磨牙、上颌第一前磨牙、下侧切牙、下犬齿外,各牙宽配对间差异无统计学意义(P<0.010)。方差分析发现,在错牙合组中,平均前路TSD比值无显著差异。然而,不同类型错牙合的平均总TSD比差异有统计学意义(P<0.04)。结论:各错牙合组间的TSD仅在平均总TSD比值上有统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Corneal Endothelial Morphological Alterations in Type 2 Diabetes: Associations with Glycemic Control, Disease Duration, and Diabetic Retinopathy Severity—A Cross-Sectional Study in Benghazi, Libya Efficacy and Safety of Holmium Laser Lithotripsy for Renal Calculi in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: A Comparative Study in Libyan Patients Medical Students' Performances Using Different Assessment Methods during the Final Examination in Internal Medicine at the University of Benghazi, Libya Ruptured Subcapsular Liver Hematoma: A Rare Complication of HELLP Syndrome Ectopic Spleen in the Pelvis: A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1