The Kennedy Court

IF 2 2区 社会学 Q1 LAW Supreme Court Review Pub Date : 2022-01-14 DOI:10.2307/j.ctv27qzrdn.15
Erwin Chemerinsky
{"title":"The Kennedy Court","authors":"Erwin Chemerinsky","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv27qzrdn.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Where Kennedy voted with the three conservative justices – Roberts, Thomas and Alito – the result was a 4-4 tie. This meant that the lower court decision was affirmed, without opinion from the Supreme Court, by an evenly divided court. This occurred most notably in United States v. Texas, which was a challenge to President Obama’s immigration action, Deferred Action of Parents of Americans, and in Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association, which was about whether non-union members can continue to be required to pay agency fees that support collective bargaining activities. In the former, it meant that a nationwide preliminary injunction against the Obama immigration action remains in effect. In the latter, it means that there is no change in the law, and non-union members must continue to pay their “fair share” of fees.","PeriodicalId":46006,"journal":{"name":"Supreme Court Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supreme Court Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv27qzrdn.15","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Where Kennedy voted with the three conservative justices – Roberts, Thomas and Alito – the result was a 4-4 tie. This meant that the lower court decision was affirmed, without opinion from the Supreme Court, by an evenly divided court. This occurred most notably in United States v. Texas, which was a challenge to President Obama’s immigration action, Deferred Action of Parents of Americans, and in Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association, which was about whether non-union members can continue to be required to pay agency fees that support collective bargaining activities. In the former, it meant that a nationwide preliminary injunction against the Obama immigration action remains in effect. In the latter, it means that there is no change in the law, and non-union members must continue to pay their “fair share” of fees.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肯尼迪法院
肯尼迪与三位保守派大法官罗伯茨、托马斯和阿利托一起投票,结果是4比4的平局。这意味着下级法院的判决在没有最高法院意见的情况下,由两派势均力敌的法院维持。这在美国诉德克萨斯州案中最为明显,这是对奥巴马总统的移民行动的挑战,美国父母的延期行动,以及弗里德里希诉加州教师协会案,这是关于非工会成员是否可以继续被要求支付支持集体谈判活动的代理费。在前者中,这意味着针对奥巴马移民行动的全国性初步禁令仍然有效。在后者中,这意味着法律没有变化,非工会成员必须继续支付他们的“公平份额”费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: Since it first appeared in 1960, the Supreme Court Review has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court"s most significant decisions. SCR is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, keeping up on the forefront of the origins, reforms, and interpretations of American law. SCR is written by and for legal academics, judges, political scientists, journalists, historians, economists, policy planners, and sociologists.
期刊最新文献
Front Matter What Should Be National and What Should Be Local in American Judicial Review Disestablishing the Establishment Clause Manufacturing Outliers The Anti-Democratic Major Questions Doctrine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1