{"title":"The Kennedy Court","authors":"Erwin Chemerinsky","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv27qzrdn.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Where Kennedy voted with the three conservative justices – Roberts, Thomas and Alito – the result was a 4-4 tie. This meant that the lower court decision was affirmed, without opinion from the Supreme Court, by an evenly divided court. This occurred most notably in United States v. Texas, which was a challenge to President Obama’s immigration action, Deferred Action of Parents of Americans, and in Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association, which was about whether non-union members can continue to be required to pay agency fees that support collective bargaining activities. In the former, it meant that a nationwide preliminary injunction against the Obama immigration action remains in effect. In the latter, it means that there is no change in the law, and non-union members must continue to pay their “fair share” of fees.","PeriodicalId":46006,"journal":{"name":"Supreme Court Review","volume":"129 11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supreme Court Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv27qzrdn.15","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Where Kennedy voted with the three conservative justices – Roberts, Thomas and Alito – the result was a 4-4 tie. This meant that the lower court decision was affirmed, without opinion from the Supreme Court, by an evenly divided court. This occurred most notably in United States v. Texas, which was a challenge to President Obama’s immigration action, Deferred Action of Parents of Americans, and in Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association, which was about whether non-union members can continue to be required to pay agency fees that support collective bargaining activities. In the former, it meant that a nationwide preliminary injunction against the Obama immigration action remains in effect. In the latter, it means that there is no change in the law, and non-union members must continue to pay their “fair share” of fees.
期刊介绍:
Since it first appeared in 1960, the Supreme Court Review has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court"s most significant decisions. SCR is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, keeping up on the forefront of the origins, reforms, and interpretations of American law. SCR is written by and for legal academics, judges, political scientists, journalists, historians, economists, policy planners, and sociologists.