Remote Employee Engagement and Organizational Leadership Culture, Measured By EENDEED, a Validated Instrument

Susan Saurage-Altenloh, T. Tate, Franklin M. Lartey, P. Randall
{"title":"Remote Employee Engagement and Organizational Leadership Culture, Measured By EENDEED, a Validated Instrument","authors":"Susan Saurage-Altenloh, T. Tate, Franklin M. Lartey, P. Randall","doi":"10.5539/ibr.v16n7p31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the current post-pandemic unpredictable work environment characterized by remote and hybrid work, the leadership culture of an organization is important in fostering a desirable working environment. Such a culture of leadership is modeled by leaders of the organization and instilled in new leaders, as leadership helps motivate, inspire, and engage employees. \n \nThe purpose of this study was to analyze if the four types of leadership culture (mentoring, risk-taking, result-oriented, and coordinating) as determined by the Organizational Culture Assessment Instrument (OCAI) have a direct influence on the level of engagement of employees. \n \nTo analyze the influence of organizational leadership culture on remote employee engagement, this study implemented a quantitative non-experimental correlational design. Remote employee engagement was measured using a validated instrument called EENDEED (Enhanced Engagement Nurtured by Determination, Efficacy, and Exchange Dimensions). Data were collected through an online survey from 325 participants, all remote workers in organizations within the United States and a multiple regression analysis was conducted. \n \nThe findings of this study confirmed that there was a statistically significant relationship between an organization’s leadership culture and its employees’ level of engagement. In other words, the organization leadership culture as defined by OCAI contributes to employee engagement. Mentoring was shown to be the highest contributor in employee engagement. In other words, a mentoring-based leadership culture produced more engaged employees. While risk-taking and coordinating produced a statistically significant positive contribution to employee engagement, a result-oriented culture was not significant in contributing to employee engagement.","PeriodicalId":13861,"journal":{"name":"International journal of business research","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of business research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v16n7p31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the current post-pandemic unpredictable work environment characterized by remote and hybrid work, the leadership culture of an organization is important in fostering a desirable working environment. Such a culture of leadership is modeled by leaders of the organization and instilled in new leaders, as leadership helps motivate, inspire, and engage employees. The purpose of this study was to analyze if the four types of leadership culture (mentoring, risk-taking, result-oriented, and coordinating) as determined by the Organizational Culture Assessment Instrument (OCAI) have a direct influence on the level of engagement of employees. To analyze the influence of organizational leadership culture on remote employee engagement, this study implemented a quantitative non-experimental correlational design. Remote employee engagement was measured using a validated instrument called EENDEED (Enhanced Engagement Nurtured by Determination, Efficacy, and Exchange Dimensions). Data were collected through an online survey from 325 participants, all remote workers in organizations within the United States and a multiple regression analysis was conducted. The findings of this study confirmed that there was a statistically significant relationship between an organization’s leadership culture and its employees’ level of engagement. In other words, the organization leadership culture as defined by OCAI contributes to employee engagement. Mentoring was shown to be the highest contributor in employee engagement. In other words, a mentoring-based leadership culture produced more engaged employees. While risk-taking and coordinating produced a statistically significant positive contribution to employee engagement, a result-oriented culture was not significant in contributing to employee engagement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
远程员工敬业度与组织领导文化——基于eended的测量方法
鉴于当前大流行后不可预测的工作环境以远程和混合工作为特征,组织的领导文化对于营造理想的工作环境非常重要。这种领导文化是由组织的领导者塑造的,并灌输给新的领导者,因为领导力有助于激励、激励和吸引员工。本研究的目的是分析组织文化评估工具(OCAI)所确定的四种类型的领导文化(师徒型、冒险型、结果导向型和协调型)是否对员工的敬业程度有直接影响。为了分析组织领导文化对远程员工敬业度的影响,本研究采用了定量的非实验相关设计。远程员工敬业度是用一种被称为EENDEED(决心、效率和交换维度培养的增强敬业度)的有效工具来测量的。通过在线调查收集了325名参与者的数据,这些参与者都是美国组织中的远程工作者,并进行了多元回归分析。本研究的结果证实了组织的领导文化与员工敬业度之间存在统计学上显著的关系。换句话说,OCAI定义的组织领导文化有助于员工敬业度。指导被证明是员工敬业度的最大贡献者。换句话说,以导师为基础的领导文化产生了更投入的员工。虽然冒险和协调对员工敬业度产生了统计上显著的积极贡献,但结果导向的文化对员工敬业度的贡献并不显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
IDENTIFYING LEADERSHIP ETHICS: A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF WARRICK'S (1981) LEADERSHIP STYLE IDENTIFIER FRAMEWORK Banking Transparency, Financial Information and Liquidity Risk Management: Case of Saudi Banks Reviewer Acknowledgements for International Business Research, Vol. 16, No. 11 Birth Order and Executive Risk-Taking: A Study on CEO Behavioral Disposition The Chance of FinTech to be a New General-Purpose Technology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1