{"title":"Treatment with fluvoxamine in nonhospitalized coronavirus disease 2019 patients","authors":"M. Ibrahim, Mohammed Shehta","doi":"10.4103/ecdt.ecdt_38_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context Fluvoxamine may have a potential immune-regulatory action and a therapeutic role in severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) infection that may prevent progression and/or hospitalization. Aims Trial that compared fluvoxamine versus placebo in nonhospitalized adults with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (mild and moderate coronavirus disease 2019 cases). Settings and design This is a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial. Patients and methods The study enrolled 162 cases with positive PCR assay for SARS-CoV-2 infection and who were symptomatic within 7 days of the first dose of study medication. Statistical analysis The demographic, clinical, and laboratory data gathered together will be tabulated and statistically analyzed. The statistical analysis of data was carried out using Excel and the SPSS programs statistical package for AQ8 Social Sciences, version 17. Quantitative data were described as median (minimum–maximum). An analysis of the data was carried out to test statistically significant differences between groups. Quantitative data were presented as mean±SD and the Student’s t test was used to compare between two groups. Results In all, 162 patients completed the study; 72 patients were of mild severity; 90 patients were moderate cases and each group was randomized to receive fluvoxamine or placebo besides standard care. In the mild group, no significant difference was recorded while slight significance exists in the moderate severity group. Conclusions Fluvoxamine may have an added value besides the current standard care in reducing the need for hospitalization in outpatient cases, especially pneumonic ones; however, more larger studies are needed.","PeriodicalId":46359,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Chest Diseases and Tuberculosis","volume":"28 1","pages":"40 - 45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Chest Diseases and Tuberculosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ecdt.ecdt_38_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Context Fluvoxamine may have a potential immune-regulatory action and a therapeutic role in severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) infection that may prevent progression and/or hospitalization. Aims Trial that compared fluvoxamine versus placebo in nonhospitalized adults with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (mild and moderate coronavirus disease 2019 cases). Settings and design This is a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial. Patients and methods The study enrolled 162 cases with positive PCR assay for SARS-CoV-2 infection and who were symptomatic within 7 days of the first dose of study medication. Statistical analysis The demographic, clinical, and laboratory data gathered together will be tabulated and statistically analyzed. The statistical analysis of data was carried out using Excel and the SPSS programs statistical package for AQ8 Social Sciences, version 17. Quantitative data were described as median (minimum–maximum). An analysis of the data was carried out to test statistically significant differences between groups. Quantitative data were presented as mean±SD and the Student’s t test was used to compare between two groups. Results In all, 162 patients completed the study; 72 patients were of mild severity; 90 patients were moderate cases and each group was randomized to receive fluvoxamine or placebo besides standard care. In the mild group, no significant difference was recorded while slight significance exists in the moderate severity group. Conclusions Fluvoxamine may have an added value besides the current standard care in reducing the need for hospitalization in outpatient cases, especially pneumonic ones; however, more larger studies are needed.
氟伏沙明可能在严重急性呼吸综合征-冠状病毒(SARS-CoV-2)感染中具有潜在的免疫调节作用和治疗作用,可预防进展和/或住院。目的比较氟伏沙明和安慰剂在确诊SARS-CoV-2感染的未住院成人(2019年轻中度冠状病毒病病例)中的作用。这是一项双盲随机临床试验。患者与方法本研究纳入162例PCR检测阳性的SARS-CoV-2感染病例,并在首次给药后7天内出现症状。统计分析收集到的人口统计、临床和实验室数据将被制成表格并进行统计分析。数据的统计分析使用Excel和SPSS程序statistical package for AQ8 Social Sciences, version 17进行。定量数据用中位数(最小-最大)描述。对数据进行了分析,以检验组间的统计学显著差异。定量数据以mean±SD表示,两组间比较采用Student’s t检验。结果共162例患者完成研究;轻度72例;中度病例90例,每组在标准治疗的基础上随机接受氟伏沙明或安慰剂治疗。轻度组无显著性差异,中度组有轻微显著性差异。结论氟伏沙明在减少门诊病人特别是肺炎病人住院治疗方面有一定的附加价值;然而,还需要更大规模的研究。
期刊介绍:
The journal will cover technical and clinical studies related to health, ethical and social issues in field of The Egyptian Journal of Chest Diseases and Tuberculosis aims to publish and inform readers and all chest physicians of the progress in medical research concerning all aspect of chest diseases. Publications include original articles review articles, editorials, case studies and reports which are relevant to chest diseases. The Journal also aims to highlight recent updates in chest medicine. . Articles with clinical interest and implications will be given preference.