Unhealthy after School Snacks: Socioeconomic Disparities of Food Environments around Public and Private Schools in the United States

Q2 Social Sciences Papers in Applied Geography Pub Date : 2021-07-08 DOI:10.1080/23754931.2021.1943499
Andrea Smith, Yingru Li, Ting Du
{"title":"Unhealthy after School Snacks: Socioeconomic Disparities of Food Environments around Public and Private Schools in the United States","authors":"Andrea Smith, Yingru Li, Ting Du","doi":"10.1080/23754931.2021.1943499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study aims to compare the food retail environments (hereafter FRE) around public and private schools in the United States and explore if socioeconomic factors on the school and county levels affect the FREs around schools. This research includes 75,055 public and 20,427 private schools as well as 65,044 convenience stores, 44,383 small food stores, and 96,652 healthy grocery stores (e.g., supermarkets and supercenters). A t test was run to compare the FREs around public and private schools. Regression models were run to examine the influences of the socioeconomic factors on school FREs. FRE around private schools was of lower quality compared to that of public schools (p < 0.01). Both school and county level socio-demographic factors had significant influences on school FREs. Schools with higher percentages of racially marginalized and low-income students tend to have worst FREs (p  < 0.001). Schools located in counties with high racial segregation, non-White percentage, unemployment, poverty rate, and low educational attainment tend to have unhealthy FEs as well (p < 0.001). Policy makers should pay attention to FREs around both private and public schools, particularly those schools with high percentages of low SES students and located in disadvantaged counties.","PeriodicalId":36897,"journal":{"name":"Papers in Applied Geography","volume":"79 1","pages":"50 - 60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Papers in Applied Geography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23754931.2021.1943499","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract This study aims to compare the food retail environments (hereafter FRE) around public and private schools in the United States and explore if socioeconomic factors on the school and county levels affect the FREs around schools. This research includes 75,055 public and 20,427 private schools as well as 65,044 convenience stores, 44,383 small food stores, and 96,652 healthy grocery stores (e.g., supermarkets and supercenters). A t test was run to compare the FREs around public and private schools. Regression models were run to examine the influences of the socioeconomic factors on school FREs. FRE around private schools was of lower quality compared to that of public schools (p < 0.01). Both school and county level socio-demographic factors had significant influences on school FREs. Schools with higher percentages of racially marginalized and low-income students tend to have worst FREs (p  < 0.001). Schools located in counties with high racial segregation, non-White percentage, unemployment, poverty rate, and low educational attainment tend to have unhealthy FEs as well (p < 0.001). Policy makers should pay attention to FREs around both private and public schools, particularly those schools with high percentages of low SES students and located in disadvantaged counties.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不健康的放学后零食:美国公立和私立学校周围食物环境的社会经济差异
摘要本研究旨在比较美国公立和私立学校周边的食品零售环境(以下简称FRE),并探讨学校和县层面的社会经济因素是否影响学校周边的FRE。这项研究包括75,055所公立学校和20,427所私立学校,以及65,044家便利店,44,383家小食品店和96,652家健康杂货店(如超市和超级中心)。对公立学校和私立学校的FREs进行了t检验。运用回归模型检验社会经济因素对学校fre的影响。私立学校的FRE质量低于公立学校(p < 0.01)。学校和县域社会人口因素对学校fre均有显著影响。种族边缘化和低收入家庭学生比例较高的学校往往有最差的FREs (p < 0.001)。位于种族隔离程度高、非白人比例高、失业率高、贫困率高、受教育程度低的县的学校,也往往有不健康的FEs (p < 0.001)。政策制定者应该关注私立学校和公立学校周围的FREs,特别是那些低收入家庭学生比例很高的学校和位于弱势县的学校。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Papers in Applied Geography
Papers in Applied Geography Social Sciences-Urban Studies
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
Unraveling Urban Retail Realities: Assessing Revenue Shifts and Policy Effects in Seoul, South Korea, Pre- and During the COVID-19 Pandemic Spatial Big Data Analytics of Inequity in Access to Live Music Among Disadvantaged Populations Drowning in the Sea: A Digital Shoreline Analysis of Coastline Changes in Ilaje, Nigeria The Spatial Impact of Crowds in the Chilean Social Explosion: A Case Study of Postpolitical Democracy An Overview of the Importance of DEM Resolution in Soil Erosion Assessment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1