Development of a decision tree model for the prediction of the limitation potential of phytoplankton in Lake Okeechobee, Florida, USA

T. East, B. Sharfstein
{"title":"Development of a decision tree model for the prediction of the limitation potential of phytoplankton in Lake Okeechobee, Florida, USA","authors":"T. East, B. Sharfstein","doi":"10.1127/0003-9136/2006/0165-0127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Conducting long-term algal bioassays in large, complex systems such as Lake Okeechobee is an expensive and time-intensive undertaking, especially in comparison with physical and chemical monitoring. This paper describes a water quality-based decision tree model for predicting whether the phytoplankton in Lake Okeechobee is limited by light or nutrients. The model was developed and validated using the results of algal bioassays coupled with routinely monitored water quality data. Algal bioassays indicated that the factor most commonly limiting phytoplankton production in Lake Okeechobee for the period of October 1997 to November 2000 was light (59 %) followed by nitrogen (41 %). Limitation status of the phytoplankton was positively correlated with irradiance (in terms of Secchi depth/total depth) and phytoplankton biomass (in terms of chlorophyll-a) and negatively related to dissolved inorganic nitrogen and soluble reactive phosphorus concentrations. A cross-tabulation procedure was used to examine how the frequency of occurrence of light limitation and nutrient limitation varied as a function of these variables. The cross-tabulation procedure was also used to derive the empirical threshold values used to construct the model. This result supports both the accuracy of the derived critical threshold values and the validity of using chemical measurements in predicting whether light is limiting or nutrients are limiting in Lake Okeechobee. The model successfully predicted light limitation versus nutrient limitation in three independent validation data sets 70 % to 85 % of the time. When nutrient limiting conditions prevailed, the model did not successfully predict which nutrient (nitrogen, phosphorus, or a combination of nitrogen and phosphorus) was limiting. Our results suggest that the predictive abilities of the model could be enhanced by using time-specific data rather than averaged monthly data.","PeriodicalId":8118,"journal":{"name":"Archiv Fur Hydrobiologie","volume":"1 1","pages":"127-144"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archiv Fur Hydrobiologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1127/0003-9136/2006/0165-0127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Conducting long-term algal bioassays in large, complex systems such as Lake Okeechobee is an expensive and time-intensive undertaking, especially in comparison with physical and chemical monitoring. This paper describes a water quality-based decision tree model for predicting whether the phytoplankton in Lake Okeechobee is limited by light or nutrients. The model was developed and validated using the results of algal bioassays coupled with routinely monitored water quality data. Algal bioassays indicated that the factor most commonly limiting phytoplankton production in Lake Okeechobee for the period of October 1997 to November 2000 was light (59 %) followed by nitrogen (41 %). Limitation status of the phytoplankton was positively correlated with irradiance (in terms of Secchi depth/total depth) and phytoplankton biomass (in terms of chlorophyll-a) and negatively related to dissolved inorganic nitrogen and soluble reactive phosphorus concentrations. A cross-tabulation procedure was used to examine how the frequency of occurrence of light limitation and nutrient limitation varied as a function of these variables. The cross-tabulation procedure was also used to derive the empirical threshold values used to construct the model. This result supports both the accuracy of the derived critical threshold values and the validity of using chemical measurements in predicting whether light is limiting or nutrients are limiting in Lake Okeechobee. The model successfully predicted light limitation versus nutrient limitation in three independent validation data sets 70 % to 85 % of the time. When nutrient limiting conditions prevailed, the model did not successfully predict which nutrient (nitrogen, phosphorus, or a combination of nitrogen and phosphorus) was limiting. Our results suggest that the predictive abilities of the model could be enhanced by using time-specific data rather than averaged monthly data.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国佛罗里达州奥基乔比湖浮游植物限量潜力预测决策树模型的建立
在像奥基乔比湖这样的大型复杂系统中进行长期的藻类生物分析是一项昂贵且耗时的工作,特别是与物理和化学监测相比。本文建立了一种基于水质的决策树模型,用于预测奥基乔比湖浮游植物是否受到光照或营养物质的限制。该模型是利用藻类生物测定结果和常规监测的水质数据开发和验证的。藻类生物测定表明,在1997年10月至2000年11月期间,最常见的限制奥基乔比湖浮游植物产量的因素是光照(59%),其次是氮(41%)。浮游植物的限制状态与辐照度(以Secchi深度/总深度计)和浮游植物生物量(以叶绿素-a计)呈正相关,与溶解无机氮和可溶性活性磷浓度负相关。使用交叉表程序来检查光限制和营养限制的发生频率如何作为这些变量的函数而变化。交叉表程序也被用来推导用于构建模型的经验阈值。这一结果既支持了导出的临界阈值的准确性,也支持了使用化学测量来预测奥基乔比湖的光照限制或营养限制的有效性。该模型在三个独立验证数据集中成功预测光照限制与营养限制的准确率为70%至85%。当营养限制条件普遍存在时,该模型无法成功预测哪种营养(氮、磷或氮和磷的组合)是限制条件。我们的研究结果表明,模型的预测能力可以通过使用特定时间的数据而不是平均每月的数据来增强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Colloid characterization at the sediment-water interface of Vidy Bay, Lake Geneva Management effects on fungal assemblages in irrigation ponds: are biodiversity conservation and the control of phytopathogens compatible? Oxylipins from freshwater diatoms act as attractants for a benthic herbivore "Spectral fingerprinting" for specific algal groups on sediments in situ: a new sensor Baltic Eubosmina morphological radiation : Sensitivity to invertebrate predators (induction) and observations on genetic differences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1