Through Thick and Thin: The In Vitro Effects of Thickeners On Infant Feed Viscosity.

Jenny Koo, Averyl Narvasa, L. Bode, J. H. Kim
{"title":"Through Thick and Thin: The In Vitro Effects of Thickeners On Infant Feed Viscosity.","authors":"Jenny Koo, Averyl Narvasa, L. Bode, J. H. Kim","doi":"10.1097/MPG.0000000000002470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nGastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common problem in neonates, and current modalities for thickening human milk produce inconsistent outcomes. The objective of this in vitro study is to measure the viscosity effect of different thickening strategies.\n\n\nMETHODS\nWe thickened donor human milk (DHM) and formula using various thickeners: starch-based thickeners (SBT) (Thick It®, rice cereal), and gum-based thickeners (GBT) (xanthan gum: Simply Thick®, Thicken Up Clear®; carob gum: GelMix®). We also assessed formula with added starches marketed for reflux, including Similac Spit Up® (SSU) and Enfamil AR® (EAR). The viscosity of each sample was measured over time using a rotary viscometer. Additional variables, including acidity, temperature, and the addition of human milk fortifier, were tested.\n\n\nRESULTS\nFormula can be effectively thickened with all tested thickeners, but the viscosities of thickened formula increase over time. On the other hand, DHM does not effectively thicken with SBT. Autoclaving DHM inactivates digestive enzymes, thus allowing SBT to successfully thicken autoclaved DHM. GBT effectively thickened both DHM and formula but reached higher viscosities than intended based on manufacturer recommendations. Adding acid to xanthan-gum thickened DHM resulted in phase separation and formation of solid precipitant.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nCurrent thickening strategies of preterm infant feeding produces highly variable results in final feed viscosity. The unpredictable properties of gum-based thickeners raise questions about their safety profile. Objective measures of liquid viscosity and careful consideration of acidity and time are recommended for adequate comparisons of thickening regimens. Human milk continues to be the most challenging feed type to thicken.","PeriodicalId":16725,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0000000000002470","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

BACKGROUND Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common problem in neonates, and current modalities for thickening human milk produce inconsistent outcomes. The objective of this in vitro study is to measure the viscosity effect of different thickening strategies. METHODS We thickened donor human milk (DHM) and formula using various thickeners: starch-based thickeners (SBT) (Thick It®, rice cereal), and gum-based thickeners (GBT) (xanthan gum: Simply Thick®, Thicken Up Clear®; carob gum: GelMix®). We also assessed formula with added starches marketed for reflux, including Similac Spit Up® (SSU) and Enfamil AR® (EAR). The viscosity of each sample was measured over time using a rotary viscometer. Additional variables, including acidity, temperature, and the addition of human milk fortifier, were tested. RESULTS Formula can be effectively thickened with all tested thickeners, but the viscosities of thickened formula increase over time. On the other hand, DHM does not effectively thicken with SBT. Autoclaving DHM inactivates digestive enzymes, thus allowing SBT to successfully thicken autoclaved DHM. GBT effectively thickened both DHM and formula but reached higher viscosities than intended based on manufacturer recommendations. Adding acid to xanthan-gum thickened DHM resulted in phase separation and formation of solid precipitant. CONCLUSIONS Current thickening strategies of preterm infant feeding produces highly variable results in final feed viscosity. The unpredictable properties of gum-based thickeners raise questions about their safety profile. Objective measures of liquid viscosity and careful consideration of acidity and time are recommended for adequate comparisons of thickening regimens. Human milk continues to be the most challenging feed type to thicken.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
增稠剂对婴儿饲料粘度的体外影响。
背景:胃食管反流病(GERD)是新生儿的常见问题,目前增稠人乳的方式产生不一致的结果。本体外研究的目的是测量不同增稠策略的粘度效应。方法:采用多种增稠剂对供体母乳(DHM)和配方奶进行增稠:淀粉基增稠剂(SBT) (Thick It®,米粉)和胶基增稠剂(GBT)(黄原胶:simple Thick®,Thicken Up Clear®;角豆胶:GelMix®)。我们还评估了市场上用于反流的添加淀粉的配方,包括Similac Spit Up®(SSU)和Enfamil AR®(EAR)。使用旋转粘度计测量每个样品的粘度随时间的变化。测试了其他变量,包括酸度、温度和人乳强化剂的添加。结果所有增稠剂均能有效增稠配方,但增稠配方的粘度随时间增加而增加。另一方面,DHM不能有效增厚SBT。高压灭菌DHM使消化酶失活,从而使SBT成功地使高压灭菌DHM增稠。GBT有效地增稠了DHM和配方,但达到了比制造商建议的更高的粘度。在黄原胶中加入酸使DHM增稠,导致相分离和固体沉淀的形成。结论目前的增稠策略对早产儿的最终饲料粘度有很大的影响。胶基增稠剂不可预测的特性引起了人们对其安全性的质疑。对于增稠方案的充分比较,建议采用液体粘度的客观测量,并仔细考虑酸度和时间。人乳仍然是最具挑战性的增稠饲料类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Cutting Edge: a 17-Year-Old Female with Razor Blade Ingestion. Learning Curve Analyses for Achieving Satisfactory Procedural Completion Rates in Paediatric Oesophagogastroduodenoscopy. Trough Levels of Infliximab at W6 Are Predictive of Remission at W14 in Pediatric Crohn Disease. Community Socioeconomic Deprivation and Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Severity. European Society Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Guidelines for Diagnosing Coeliac Disease 2019.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1