Cost Effective Water Shut-Off: Slickline Conveyed High Expansion Ratio Through Tubing Bridge Plug

Muhammad Abdulhadi, Pei Tze Kueh, A. Zamanuri, Wai Cheong Thang, H. Chin, S. Jacobs, Alister Albert Suggust, Ahmad Hafizi Ahmad Zaini, Delwistiel Jamel, Khairul Arifin Dolah, Hasim Munandai, Zainuddin Yusop
{"title":"Cost Effective Water Shut-Off: Slickline Conveyed High Expansion Ratio Through Tubing Bridge Plug","authors":"Muhammad Abdulhadi, Pei Tze Kueh, A. Zamanuri, Wai Cheong Thang, H. Chin, S. Jacobs, Alister Albert Suggust, Ahmad Hafizi Ahmad Zaini, Delwistiel Jamel, Khairul Arifin Dolah, Hasim Munandai, Zainuddin Yusop","doi":"10.2118/192145-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In the recent low oil price environment, a cost-effective solution was proposed to use through tubing bridge plugs to perform water-shut-off (WSO) in an offshore field. The solution consisted of using slickline to set a plug with a high expansion ratio followed by a cement dump. After three WSO jobs in different wells, the method has successfully proven itself. Watercut was reduced from 100% to 0% with a minimal cost of only USD100,000.\n The through tubing bridge plug used is capable of passing through 2-7/8-in. tubing and expanding into 9-5/8-in. casing. After running a Gamma-Ray log, the plug was set across the perforation interval to give the anchor contact with a rough casing surface. The top of the plug, however, was above the perforation interval and became the base for cement. Cement was then continuously dumped on top using a slickline dump bailer in a static condition until the designed cement height was reached. Static conditions ensured no movement of cement during operation. The plug differential pressure limit is directly proportional to the cement height.\n The first WSO job was a complete success with watercut reduced from 100% to 0%. The second job however, was partially successful as the cement dump was not completed due to unexpected appearance of a hold-up-depth (HUD). The HUD was created by leftover cement which had accumulated at the end of the tubing. Despite the setbacks, the end result was successful in reducing water production from 1000 bwpd to 200 bwpd. The third job faced a completely different problem. The original plug fell off deeper into the well after it was set. To rectify the situation, a second plug was set at the target interval. Despite the successful execution, there was no change in watercut after the well was brought back online. Since the same method was proposed for another upcoming well, Memory-Production log (MPLT) coupled with Temperature-Noise log was performed to assess the effectiveness of the WSO. The log results confirmed that the WSO was successful and the post job water production was caused by channeling behind the casing. The results so far concluded that the through tubing bridge plug WSO method was both reliable and cost-effective. It is exceptionally suitable for zones located at the bottom of a well and can be deployed using slickline.\n The paper provides valuable insight to a WSO solution which should be a first-choice option due to its relatively inexpensive cost and high reliability. The solution has proven to provide tremendous cost saving for production enhancement activity.","PeriodicalId":11182,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Thu, October 25, 2018","volume":"75 1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Thu, October 25, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/192145-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the recent low oil price environment, a cost-effective solution was proposed to use through tubing bridge plugs to perform water-shut-off (WSO) in an offshore field. The solution consisted of using slickline to set a plug with a high expansion ratio followed by a cement dump. After three WSO jobs in different wells, the method has successfully proven itself. Watercut was reduced from 100% to 0% with a minimal cost of only USD100,000. The through tubing bridge plug used is capable of passing through 2-7/8-in. tubing and expanding into 9-5/8-in. casing. After running a Gamma-Ray log, the plug was set across the perforation interval to give the anchor contact with a rough casing surface. The top of the plug, however, was above the perforation interval and became the base for cement. Cement was then continuously dumped on top using a slickline dump bailer in a static condition until the designed cement height was reached. Static conditions ensured no movement of cement during operation. The plug differential pressure limit is directly proportional to the cement height. The first WSO job was a complete success with watercut reduced from 100% to 0%. The second job however, was partially successful as the cement dump was not completed due to unexpected appearance of a hold-up-depth (HUD). The HUD was created by leftover cement which had accumulated at the end of the tubing. Despite the setbacks, the end result was successful in reducing water production from 1000 bwpd to 200 bwpd. The third job faced a completely different problem. The original plug fell off deeper into the well after it was set. To rectify the situation, a second plug was set at the target interval. Despite the successful execution, there was no change in watercut after the well was brought back online. Since the same method was proposed for another upcoming well, Memory-Production log (MPLT) coupled with Temperature-Noise log was performed to assess the effectiveness of the WSO. The log results confirmed that the WSO was successful and the post job water production was caused by channeling behind the casing. The results so far concluded that the through tubing bridge plug WSO method was both reliable and cost-effective. It is exceptionally suitable for zones located at the bottom of a well and can be deployed using slickline. The paper provides valuable insight to a WSO solution which should be a first-choice option due to its relatively inexpensive cost and high reliability. The solution has proven to provide tremendous cost saving for production enhancement activity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经济高效的堵水:钢丝通过油管桥塞输送高膨胀率
在最近的低油价环境下,提出了一种经济有效的解决方案,即通过油管桥塞在海上油田进行堵水(WSO)。该解决方案包括使用钢丝绳坐封具有高膨胀比的桥塞,然后进行水泥倾倒。在不同的井中进行了三次WSO作业后,该方法已经成功地证明了自己。含水率从100%降至0%,最低成本仅为10万美元。使用的直通油管桥塞能够穿过2-7/8-in。油管和扩展到9-5/ 8in。套管。在进行伽马射线测井后,桥塞穿过射孔段坐封,使锚点接触粗糙的套管表面。然而,桥塞的顶部位于射孔段上方,成为固井的基础。然后,在静态条件下,使用钢丝绳卸料筒将水泥连续倾倒在顶部,直到达到设计的水泥高度。静态条件保证了水泥在操作过程中不移动。桥塞压差极限与水泥高度成正比。第一次WSO作业取得了圆满成功,含水率从100%降至0%。然而,第二次作业取得了部分成功,因为意外出现了阻塞深度(HUD),导致水泥倾倒没有完成。HUD是由油管末端积累的剩余水泥形成的。尽管遇到了挫折,但最终的结果是成功地将产水量从1000桶/天减少到200桶/天。第三份工作面临着完全不同的问题。最初的桥塞在坐封后会脱落到更深的井中。为了纠正这种情况,在目标井段下入了第二个桥塞。尽管执行成功,但在井重新上线后,含水率没有变化。由于在另一口即将投产的井中提出了相同的方法,因此使用记忆生产日志(MPLT)结合温度噪声日志来评估WSO的有效性。测井结果证实WSO是成功的,作业后的产水是由套管后面的窜道引起的。结果表明,通过油管桥塞WSO方法既可靠又经济。它特别适用于位于井底的区域,可以使用钢丝绳进行部署。本文为WSO解决方案提供了有价值的见解,由于其相对便宜的成本和高可靠性,WSO解决方案应该成为首选方案。该解决方案已被证明为增产活动提供了巨大的成本节约。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Discrete Net-to-Gross Truncated Gaussian Simulation: An Alternative Modelling Approach for CSG Unconventional Reservoirs, Bowen Basin, Eastern Australia Where the Laterals Go? A Feasible Way for the Trajectory Measurement of Radial Jet Drilling Wells Embracing Opportunities and Avoiding Pitfalls of Probabilistic Modelling in Field Development Planning Efficient Integration Method of Large-Scale Reservoir Compaction and Small-Scale Casing Stability Models for Oilfield Casing Failure Analysis Monitoring Water Flood Front Movement by Propagating High Frequency Pulses Through Subsurface Transmission Lines
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1