Association Of D-Dimer/Fibrinogen Ratio With Pulmonary Embolism In COVID-19 Patients

A. Topçu, F. Yiğit, Gozde Ozturk Altunyurt, A. Batırel, M. Rabus
{"title":"Association Of D-Dimer/Fibrinogen Ratio With Pulmonary Embolism In COVID-19 Patients","authors":"A. Topçu, F. Yiğit, Gozde Ozturk Altunyurt, A. Batırel, M. Rabus","doi":"10.9739/tjvs.2022.1261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: This study aimed to investigate whether the D-dimer / fibrinogen ratio (DDFR) measured on admission could be used as a diagnostic marker of pulmonary embolism (PE) in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. Material and Methods: This single-center, retrospective, case-control study was conducted with 204 COVID-19 patients (131 males, 73 females; mean age: 62±15.4 years; range, 28 to 97 years) between October 18, 2020, and December 18, 2020. Patients were followed during the hospital stay and for 30 days after discharge. The primary outcome was the occurrence of radiologically confirmed PE. The DDFR was calculated using the following formula: DDFR=D-dimer (ng/mL) / fibrinogen (mg/dL). Results: Six (2.9%) patients experienced PE during the follow-up. D-dimer had 63.6% sensitivity and 76.2% specificity on admission to predict thromboembolism at a cut-off of 1,375 ng/mL (area under the curve (AUC)=0.687, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.530-0.845, p<0.05). The DDFR had 75% sensitivity and 90.5% specificity on admission to predict thromboembolism at a cut-off of 5.41 (AUC =0.846, 95% CI: 0.728-0.965, p<0.05). Conclusion: A measurement of DDFR on admission does not provide incremental value over D-dimer to recognize patients who are at risk of developing PE during and early after hospitalization for COVID-19.","PeriodicalId":23982,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Vascular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Vascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9739/tjvs.2022.1261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to investigate whether the D-dimer / fibrinogen ratio (DDFR) measured on admission could be used as a diagnostic marker of pulmonary embolism (PE) in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. Material and Methods: This single-center, retrospective, case-control study was conducted with 204 COVID-19 patients (131 males, 73 females; mean age: 62±15.4 years; range, 28 to 97 years) between October 18, 2020, and December 18, 2020. Patients were followed during the hospital stay and for 30 days after discharge. The primary outcome was the occurrence of radiologically confirmed PE. The DDFR was calculated using the following formula: DDFR=D-dimer (ng/mL) / fibrinogen (mg/dL). Results: Six (2.9%) patients experienced PE during the follow-up. D-dimer had 63.6% sensitivity and 76.2% specificity on admission to predict thromboembolism at a cut-off of 1,375 ng/mL (area under the curve (AUC)=0.687, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.530-0.845, p<0.05). The DDFR had 75% sensitivity and 90.5% specificity on admission to predict thromboembolism at a cut-off of 5.41 (AUC =0.846, 95% CI: 0.728-0.965, p<0.05). Conclusion: A measurement of DDFR on admission does not provide incremental value over D-dimer to recognize patients who are at risk of developing PE during and early after hospitalization for COVID-19.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
d -二聚体/纤维蛋白原比值与COVID-19患者肺栓塞的关系
目的:探讨入院时测量的d -二聚体/纤维蛋白原比值(DDFR)是否可作为2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者肺栓塞(PE)的诊断指标。材料与方法:本研究采用单中心、回顾性、病例对照研究,纳入204例COVID-19患者(男性131例,女性73例;平均年龄:62±15.4岁;2020年10月18日至2020年12月18日,时间范围28至97年。随访患者住院期间及出院后30天。主要结果是放射学证实的PE的发生。DDFR计算公式为:DDFR= d -二聚体(ng/mL) /纤维蛋白原(mg/dL)。结果:6例(2.9%)患者在随访期间出现PE。入院时d -二聚体预测血栓栓塞的敏感性为63.6%,特异性为76.2%,截止值为1375 ng/mL(曲线下面积(AUC)=0.687, 95%可信区间(CI): 0.530-0.845, p<0.05)。入院时DDFR预测血栓栓塞的敏感性为75%,特异性为90.5%,临界值为5.41 (AUC =0.846, 95% CI: 0.728-0.965, p<0.05)。结论:入院时的DDFR测量并不能提供比d -二聚体更大的价值,以识别在COVID-19住院期间和住院后早期有发生PE风险的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Undesirable complication after transradial coronary angiography: A case report The factors influencing compliance in post-EVAR surveillance regarding the perspectives of practitioners and patients Risk factors for chronic venous insufficiency in nurses in Türkiye - NueVo TR Investigation of factors affecting reintervention after type A aortic dissection Carotid-subclavian bypass in the treatment of subclavian artery occlusion during epidermoid cyst excision: A case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1