Attachment to Dogs and Cats in Germany: Translation of the Lexington Attachment to Pets Scale (LAPS) and Description of the Pet Owning Population in Germany

Benedikt Hielscher, U. Ganslosser, I. Froboese
{"title":"Attachment to Dogs and Cats in Germany: Translation of the Lexington Attachment to Pets Scale (LAPS) and Description of the Pet Owning Population in Germany","authors":"Benedikt Hielscher, U. Ganslosser, I. Froboese","doi":"10.1079/hai.2019.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Introduction:\n Attachment to pets has been shown to impact pet owners’ (PO) physical health and quality of life. As no instrument for obtaining this kind of data currently exists in German, translating and validating the Lexington Attachment to Pets Scale (LAPS) was the aim of this study.\n Method:\n Online and paper-pencil questionnaires were used. LAPS and socio-demo-graphic data were recorded. Subjects were recruited via social media and with the help of the Verband für das deutsche Hundewesen (VDH) and one other association. A second trial was performed to examine test-retest reliability for the online questionnaire at least five days after initial completion.\n Results:\n Internal consistency is high for the total LAPS score (Cronbach’s □ = .89). Test-retest reliability is high for total LAPS score (ICC = .95; 95 % CI = .94, .96; p < .001). A significant negative correlation was found between age of the subject and total LAPS score (r = -.24, p < .001). Women scored significantly higher than men in total LAPS score (p = .008, d = -.36) and dog owners (DO) scored higher than cat owners (CO) (p = .020, d = .23). Further, significant differences have been found when comparing among PO to their level of educational attainment (\n \n p\n <\n  \n .001\n ,\n  \n ω\n =\n .21\n \n ). No significant differences between owners of purebred and owners of mixed breed pets to their animals were found.\n Conclusion:\n The German translation of the LAPS is a reliable instrument and can be used for future research.\n","PeriodicalId":90845,"journal":{"name":"Human-animal interaction bulletin","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human-animal interaction bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1079/hai.2019.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Introduction: Attachment to pets has been shown to impact pet owners’ (PO) physical health and quality of life. As no instrument for obtaining this kind of data currently exists in German, translating and validating the Lexington Attachment to Pets Scale (LAPS) was the aim of this study. Method: Online and paper-pencil questionnaires were used. LAPS and socio-demo-graphic data were recorded. Subjects were recruited via social media and with the help of the Verband für das deutsche Hundewesen (VDH) and one other association. A second trial was performed to examine test-retest reliability for the online questionnaire at least five days after initial completion. Results: Internal consistency is high for the total LAPS score (Cronbach’s □ = .89). Test-retest reliability is high for total LAPS score (ICC = .95; 95 % CI = .94, .96; p < .001). A significant negative correlation was found between age of the subject and total LAPS score (r = -.24, p < .001). Women scored significantly higher than men in total LAPS score (p = .008, d = -.36) and dog owners (DO) scored higher than cat owners (CO) (p = .020, d = .23). Further, significant differences have been found when comparing among PO to their level of educational attainment ( p <   .001 ,   ω = .21 ). No significant differences between owners of purebred and owners of mixed breed pets to their animals were found. Conclusion: The German translation of the LAPS is a reliable instrument and can be used for future research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
德国对狗和猫的依恋:列克星敦宠物依恋量表(LAPS)的翻译和德国宠物拥有人口的描述
导读:对宠物的依恋已被证明会影响宠物主人(PO)的身体健康和生活质量。由于目前在德语中没有获得此类数据的工具,因此翻译和验证列克星敦宠物依恋量表(LAPS)是本研究的目的。方法:采用在线问卷和纸笔问卷。记录了lap和社会人口统计数据。研究对象是通过社交媒体招募的,并得到了德国健康协会(VDH)和另一个协会的帮助。进行第二次试验,以检验在线问卷在初次完成后至少五天的重测信度。结果:LAPS总分的内部一致性较高(Cronbach’s□= 0.89)。lap总分重测信度较高(ICC = 0.95;95% ci = 0.94, 0.96;P < 0.001)。被试年龄与lap总分呈显著负相关(r = -)。24, p < 0.001)。女性的lap总分明显高于男性(p = 0.008, d = - 0.36),养狗者(DO)得分高于养猫者(CO) (p = 0.020, d = 0.23)。此外,当比较PO与其受教育程度水平时,发现显着差异(p < 0.001, ω = .21)。纯种宠物的主人和混合品种宠物的主人对他们的动物没有显著差异。结论:LAPS的德语翻译是一种可靠的工具,可用于未来的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Perception and Effect of Aggressive Dog Breeds on Human Social Interactions Impacts of Dog Ownership and Attachment on Total and Dog-related Physical Activity in Germany Comparing the Effect of Human-Dog Interactions and Progressive Muscle Relaxation on Self-Report and Physiological Measures of Stress Animal Welfare Considerations in Animal-Assisted Interventions The Loss of a Service Dog Through Retirement: Experiences and Impact on Human Partners
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1