Risk, Reporting and Responsibility: Modern Slavery, Colonial Power and Fashion’s Transparency Industry

IF 1.8 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY International Journal for Crime Justice and Social Democracy Pub Date : 2022-06-03 DOI:10.5204/ijcjsd.2378
Harriette Richards
{"title":"Risk, Reporting and Responsibility: Modern Slavery, Colonial Power and Fashion’s Transparency Industry","authors":"Harriette Richards","doi":"10.5204/ijcjsd.2378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article investigates the role of the Australian Modern Slavery Act 2018 as a reporting mechanism aimed at preventing the use of forced labour in global supply chains. In the fashion industry, modern slavery legislation pursues the ambitions of activist movements that have long campaigned for increased knowledge about supply chain practices to improve the labour conditions of garment workers, especially for those in the Global South. In recent years, such campaigns against the entrenched opacity of the global fashion system have given rise to a transparency industry built on practices of auditing and supply chain management, including in relation to modern slavery legislation. This article analyses 10 modern slavery statements submitted to the online Modern Slavery Register by fashion brands operating in Australia in the 2019–2020 reporting period to explore how the Modern Slavery Act 2018 participates in colonial relations of power. It focuses on three aspects of the statements: factory reporting and third-party auditing, corporate grievance mechanisms, and risks associated with COVID-19. Finally, the article argues that while improved transparency can generate positive outcomes for workers, the reporting required by modern slavery legislation is often more concerned with providing assurances about labour standards to consumers and stakeholders in the Global North than with the needs or experiences of workers in the Global South.","PeriodicalId":51781,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Crime Justice and Social Democracy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Crime Justice and Social Democracy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5204/ijcjsd.2378","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article investigates the role of the Australian Modern Slavery Act 2018 as a reporting mechanism aimed at preventing the use of forced labour in global supply chains. In the fashion industry, modern slavery legislation pursues the ambitions of activist movements that have long campaigned for increased knowledge about supply chain practices to improve the labour conditions of garment workers, especially for those in the Global South. In recent years, such campaigns against the entrenched opacity of the global fashion system have given rise to a transparency industry built on practices of auditing and supply chain management, including in relation to modern slavery legislation. This article analyses 10 modern slavery statements submitted to the online Modern Slavery Register by fashion brands operating in Australia in the 2019–2020 reporting period to explore how the Modern Slavery Act 2018 participates in colonial relations of power. It focuses on three aspects of the statements: factory reporting and third-party auditing, corporate grievance mechanisms, and risks associated with COVID-19. Finally, the article argues that while improved transparency can generate positive outcomes for workers, the reporting required by modern slavery legislation is often more concerned with providing assurances about labour standards to consumers and stakeholders in the Global North than with the needs or experiences of workers in the Global South.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
风险、报告与责任:现代奴隶制、殖民权力与时尚透明产业
本文调查了《2018年澳大利亚现代奴隶制法案》作为一种报告机制的作用,该机制旨在防止在全球供应链中使用强迫劳动。在时尚行业,现代奴隶制立法追求激进主义运动的雄心壮志,这些运动长期以来一直致力于增加对供应链实践的了解,以改善服装工人的劳动条件,特别是那些在全球南方的工人。近年来,这种针对全球时尚体系根深蒂固的不透明的运动,催生了一个建立在审计和供应链管理实践基础上的透明行业,包括与现代奴隶制立法有关的行业。本文分析了2019-2020年报告期内在澳大利亚经营的时尚品牌向在线现代奴隶制登记册提交的10份现代奴隶制声明,以探讨《2018年现代奴隶制法案》如何参与殖民权力关系。它侧重于声明的三个方面:工厂报告和第三方审计、企业申诉机制以及与COVID-19相关的风险。最后,文章认为,虽然提高透明度可以为工人带来积极的结果,但现代奴隶制立法所要求的报告往往更关注为全球北方的消费者和利益相关者提供劳工标准的保证,而不是全球南方工人的需求或经历。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
50
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
Bill McClanahan (2023) Visual Criminology. Bristol, UK: Bristol University Press Counting and Accounting for Mental Health Related Deaths in England and Wales The Theoretical Contributions of Asian Criminology in Reconstructing Criminology Building a Panopticon Through Nodal Governance: Mass Surveillance and Plural Policing in China’s COVID-19 Lockdown Secondary Green Crime: Bangkok’s PM2.5 Pollution and Policy Corruption
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1