Naya McCartney , Gayathri Kondakath , Albert Tai , Barry A. Trimmer
{"title":"Functional annotation of insecta transcriptomes: A cautionary tale from Lepidoptera","authors":"Naya McCartney , Gayathri Kondakath , Albert Tai , Barry A. Trimmer","doi":"10.1016/j.ibmb.2023.104038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Functional annotation is a critical step in the analysis of genomic data, as it provides insight into the function of individual genes and the pathways in which they participate. Currently, there is no consensus on the best computational approach for assigning functional annotation. This study compares three functional annotation methods (BLAST, eggNOG-Mapper, and InterProScan) in their ability to assign Gene Ontology terms in two species of Insecta with differing levels of annotation, </span><span><em>Bombyx mori</em></span> and <span><em>Manduca sexta</em></span>. The methods were compared for their annotation coverage, number of term assignments, term agreement and non-overlapping terms. Here we show that there are large discrepancies in gene ontology term assignment among the three computational methods, which could lead to confounding interpretations of data and non-comparable results. This study provide insight into the strengths and weaknesses of each computational method and highlight the need for more standardized methods of functional annotation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":330,"journal":{"name":"Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology","volume":"165 ","pages":"Article 104038"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965174823001327","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Functional annotation is a critical step in the analysis of genomic data, as it provides insight into the function of individual genes and the pathways in which they participate. Currently, there is no consensus on the best computational approach for assigning functional annotation. This study compares three functional annotation methods (BLAST, eggNOG-Mapper, and InterProScan) in their ability to assign Gene Ontology terms in two species of Insecta with differing levels of annotation, Bombyx mori and Manduca sexta. The methods were compared for their annotation coverage, number of term assignments, term agreement and non-overlapping terms. Here we show that there are large discrepancies in gene ontology term assignment among the three computational methods, which could lead to confounding interpretations of data and non-comparable results. This study provide insight into the strengths and weaknesses of each computational method and highlight the need for more standardized methods of functional annotation.
期刊介绍:
This international journal publishes original contributions and mini-reviews in the fields of insect biochemistry and insect molecular biology. Main areas of interest are neurochemistry, hormone and pheromone biochemistry, enzymes and metabolism, hormone action and gene regulation, gene characterization and structure, pharmacology, immunology and cell and tissue culture. Papers on the biochemistry and molecular biology of other groups of arthropods are published if of general interest to the readership. Technique papers will be considered for publication if they significantly advance the field of insect biochemistry and molecular biology in the opinion of the Editors and Editorial Board.