High on-treatment platelet reactivity in peripheral arterial disease: A systematic review.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Vascular Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-11 DOI:10.1177/17085381231214324
Lauren N Goncalves, Veerle van Velze, Frederikus A Klok, Pim Gal, Rimke C Vos, Jaap F Hamming, Koen E A van der Bogt
{"title":"High on-treatment platelet reactivity in peripheral arterial disease: A systematic review.","authors":"Lauren N Goncalves, Veerle van Velze, Frederikus A Klok, Pim Gal, Rimke C Vos, Jaap F Hamming, Koen E A van der Bogt","doi":"10.1177/17085381231214324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To highlight current evidence pertaining to the measurement methods and prevalence of high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) in patients with PAD, as well as to evaluate the relationship between HTPR and recurrent adverse cardiovascular and limb events in PAD patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of English-language literature on HTPR in patients with PAD. An electronic literature search of PubMed and Medline was performed in May 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 29 studies with a total number of 11,201 patients with PAD were identified. HTPR during clopidogrel treatment ranges from 9.8 to 77%, and during aspirin treatment ranges from 4.1 to 50% of PAD patients. HTPR was associated with adverse clinical outcomes. The need for limb revascularisation was higher in patients with HTPR during clopidogrel use. Similarly, HTPR during aspirin use in the PAD population was predictive of adverse cardiovascular events (HR 3.73; 95% CI, 1.43-9.81; <i>p</i> = .007). A wide range of techniques were applied to measure platelet resistance, without consensus on cut-off values. Furthermore, differing patient populations, a variety of antiplatelet regimens, and differing clinical endpoints highlight the high degree of heterogeneity in the studies included in this review.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No consensus on technique or cut-off values for HTPR testing has been reached. Patients with HTPR are potentially at a greater risk of adverse limb-related and cardiovascular events than patients sensitive to antiplatelet therapy illustrating the need for clinical implementation of HTPR testing. Future research must aim for consistent methodology. Adaptation of antiplatelet therapy based on HTPR results requires further exploration.</p>","PeriodicalId":23549,"journal":{"name":"Vascular","volume":" ","pages":"1177-1190"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17085381231214324","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To highlight current evidence pertaining to the measurement methods and prevalence of high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) in patients with PAD, as well as to evaluate the relationship between HTPR and recurrent adverse cardiovascular and limb events in PAD patients.

Methods: A systematic review of English-language literature on HTPR in patients with PAD. An electronic literature search of PubMed and Medline was performed in May 2021.

Results: A total of 29 studies with a total number of 11,201 patients with PAD were identified. HTPR during clopidogrel treatment ranges from 9.8 to 77%, and during aspirin treatment ranges from 4.1 to 50% of PAD patients. HTPR was associated with adverse clinical outcomes. The need for limb revascularisation was higher in patients with HTPR during clopidogrel use. Similarly, HTPR during aspirin use in the PAD population was predictive of adverse cardiovascular events (HR 3.73; 95% CI, 1.43-9.81; p = .007). A wide range of techniques were applied to measure platelet resistance, without consensus on cut-off values. Furthermore, differing patient populations, a variety of antiplatelet regimens, and differing clinical endpoints highlight the high degree of heterogeneity in the studies included in this review.

Conclusion: No consensus on technique or cut-off values for HTPR testing has been reached. Patients with HTPR are potentially at a greater risk of adverse limb-related and cardiovascular events than patients sensitive to antiplatelet therapy illustrating the need for clinical implementation of HTPR testing. Future research must aim for consistent methodology. Adaptation of antiplatelet therapy based on HTPR results requires further exploration.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外周动脉疾病治疗时血小板反应性高:一项系统综述。
目的:强调目前有关PAD患者高治疗期血小板反应性(HTPR)的测量方法和患病率的证据,并评估HTPR与PAD患者复发性不良心血管和肢体事件之间的关系。方法:系统回顾有关PAD患者HTPR的英文文献。于2021年5月对PubMed和Medline进行了电子文献检索。结果:共纳入29项研究,共纳入11,201例PAD患者。氯吡格雷治疗期间PAD患者的HTPR为9.8 - 77%,阿司匹林治疗期间为4.1 - 50%。HTPR与不良临床结果相关。在使用氯吡格雷期间,HTPR患者对肢体血运重建的需求更高。同样,PAD人群使用阿司匹林期间的HTPR可预测心血管不良事件(HR 3.73;95% ci, 1.43-9.81;P = .007)。广泛的技术应用于测量血小板阻力,没有共识的临界值。此外,不同的患者群体、各种抗血小板方案和不同的临床终点突出了本综述中纳入的研究的高度异质性。结论:对HTPR检测的技术和临界值尚未达成共识。与抗血小板治疗敏感的患者相比,HTPR患者发生肢体相关不良事件和心血管事件的潜在风险更大,这说明临床实施HTPR检测的必要性。未来的研究必须以一致的方法论为目标。基于HTPR结果的抗血小板治疗适应性需要进一步探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Vascular
Vascular 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
196
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Vascular provides readers with new and unusual up-to-date articles and case reports focusing on vascular and endovascular topics. It is a highly international forum for the discussion and debate of all aspects of this distinct surgical specialty. It also features opinion pieces, literature reviews and controversial issues presented from various points of view.
期刊最新文献
Association between statin-use and mobility and long-term survival after major lower limb amputation. Factors affecting lower extremity venous insufficiency recurrence following radiofrequency ablation. Identifying venous clinical severity score thresholds for Clinical-Etiology-Anatomy-Pathophysiology classifications of venous edema and higher. Simultaneous aortoiliac kissing Endovascular stenting for management of isolated monolateral common iliac artery aneurysm with no proximal landing zone. Increased anti-thrombotic therapy is associated with decreased major adverse limb events in patients with low wound and foot infection scores.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1