Acceptability rate and barriers to COVID-19 vaccination among healthcare workers in Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu University Teaching Hospital, Amaku-Awka, Nigeria.

IF 3.8 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease Pub Date : 2023-11-09 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20499361231174776
Ngozi Nneka Joe-Ikechebelu, Uche Marian Umeh, George Uchenna Eleje, Emeka Philip Igbodike, Emmanuel Okwudili Ogbuefi, Angela Oyilieze Akanwa, Sylvia Tochukwu Echendu, Williams Onyeka Ngene, Augusta Nkiruka Okpala, Onyinye Chigozie Okolo, Chidubem Ekpereamaka Okechukwu, Josephat Chukwudi Akabuike, Helen Obioma Agu, Vincent Ogochukwu Okpala, Onyinye Chinenye Nwazor, Anthony Obiajulu Ugochukwu Nnedum, Chinyere Celestina Esimone, Hephzibah Ngozi Agwaniru, Ethel Ifeoma Ezeabasili, Belusochi Blessing Joe-Ikechebelu
{"title":"Acceptability rate and barriers to COVID-19 vaccination among healthcare workers in Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu University Teaching Hospital, Amaku-Awka, Nigeria.","authors":"Ngozi Nneka Joe-Ikechebelu, Uche Marian Umeh, George Uchenna Eleje, Emeka Philip Igbodike, Emmanuel Okwudili Ogbuefi, Angela Oyilieze Akanwa, Sylvia Tochukwu Echendu, Williams Onyeka Ngene, Augusta Nkiruka Okpala, Onyinye Chigozie Okolo, Chidubem Ekpereamaka Okechukwu, Josephat Chukwudi Akabuike, Helen Obioma Agu, Vincent Ogochukwu Okpala, Onyinye Chinenye Nwazor, Anthony Obiajulu Ugochukwu Nnedum, Chinyere Celestina Esimone, Hephzibah Ngozi Agwaniru, Ethel Ifeoma Ezeabasili, Belusochi Blessing Joe-Ikechebelu","doi":"10.1177/20499361231174776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Healthcare workers were at the forefront of the COVID-19 pandemic. The acceptability and uptake of COVID-19 vaccines among healthcare workers was an important strategy in halting the spread of the virus as well as the antecedent implications on global health and the world economy.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to determine the acceptability rate and barriers to COVID-19 vaccination of frontline healthcare workers in Awka, Nigeria.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This is an analytical cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online cross-sectional survey was conducted from February 2022 to April 2022 to obtain the data for this study. One hundred healthcare workers were studied. Acceptability rate and barriers to uptake of COVID-19 vaccination were outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The COVID-19 vaccination rate was 45.0% among healthcare workers in study area of Awka metropolis. Ages 30-39 years had the highest acceptance rate of COVID-19 vaccination, 19 (47.5%; <i>p</i> = 0.262) with a more female preponderance of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance compared to males [26 (41.3%) vs 16 (42.2%), <i>p</i> = 0.721]. The place of residence of respondents (urban vs rural) and their marital status (married vs single) appeared not to influence the acceptance of COVID-19 vaccination [(38 (42.2%) vs 3 (33.3%); <i>p</i> = 0.667; 25 (36.8% vs 17 (54.8%); <i>p</i> = 0.433)]. Years of work experience (<10 years vs >10 years) significantly affected COVID-19 vaccine acceptance [27 (45.8%) vs 12 (52.2%); <i>p</i> = 0.029]. Educational status and monthly income appeared not to influence vaccine uptake (<i>p</i> > 0.05, for both). A significant number of respondents were not sure why they should or should not take the COVID-19 vaccine [49 (92.5%) vs 35 (83.3%); <i>p</i> = 0.001].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The COVID-19 vaccination rate is still poor among healthcare workers in Awka metropolis. The majority of respondents do not know why they should or should not take COVID-19 vaccine. We therefore recommend robust awareness campaigns that will explain in clear terms the essence and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccination in order to improve vaccine acceptance.</p>","PeriodicalId":46154,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease","volume":"10 ","pages":"20499361231174776"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10637133/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20499361231174776","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Healthcare workers were at the forefront of the COVID-19 pandemic. The acceptability and uptake of COVID-19 vaccines among healthcare workers was an important strategy in halting the spread of the virus as well as the antecedent implications on global health and the world economy.

Objectives: This study aims to determine the acceptability rate and barriers to COVID-19 vaccination of frontline healthcare workers in Awka, Nigeria.

Design: This is an analytical cross-sectional study.

Methods: An online cross-sectional survey was conducted from February 2022 to April 2022 to obtain the data for this study. One hundred healthcare workers were studied. Acceptability rate and barriers to uptake of COVID-19 vaccination were outcome measures.

Results: The COVID-19 vaccination rate was 45.0% among healthcare workers in study area of Awka metropolis. Ages 30-39 years had the highest acceptance rate of COVID-19 vaccination, 19 (47.5%; p = 0.262) with a more female preponderance of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance compared to males [26 (41.3%) vs 16 (42.2%), p = 0.721]. The place of residence of respondents (urban vs rural) and their marital status (married vs single) appeared not to influence the acceptance of COVID-19 vaccination [(38 (42.2%) vs 3 (33.3%); p = 0.667; 25 (36.8% vs 17 (54.8%); p = 0.433)]. Years of work experience (<10 years vs >10 years) significantly affected COVID-19 vaccine acceptance [27 (45.8%) vs 12 (52.2%); p = 0.029]. Educational status and monthly income appeared not to influence vaccine uptake (p > 0.05, for both). A significant number of respondents were not sure why they should or should not take the COVID-19 vaccine [49 (92.5%) vs 35 (83.3%); p = 0.001].

Conclusion: The COVID-19 vaccination rate is still poor among healthcare workers in Awka metropolis. The majority of respondents do not know why they should or should not take COVID-19 vaccine. We therefore recommend robust awareness campaigns that will explain in clear terms the essence and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccination in order to improve vaccine acceptance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼日利亚阿马库-奥卡Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu大学教学医院医护人员COVID-19疫苗接种的接受率和障碍
背景:卫生保健工作者处于COVID-19大流行的最前沿。医护人员接受和接受COVID-19疫苗是遏制病毒传播以及之前对全球卫生和世界经济的影响的一项重要战略。目的:本研究旨在确定尼日利亚Awka一线医护人员对COVID-19疫苗接种的接受率和障碍。设计:这是一项分析性横断面研究。方法:于2022年2月至2022年4月进行在线横断面调查,获取本研究数据。对100名医护人员进行了研究。结果衡量指标为COVID-19疫苗接种的可接受率和接受障碍。结果:研究区卫生工作者新冠肺炎疫苗接种率为45.0%。30 ~ 39岁人群新冠肺炎疫苗接种率最高,19例(47.5%);p = 0.262),女性接受COVID-19疫苗的比例高于男性[26人(41.3%)对16人(42.2%),p = 0.721]。调查对象的居住地(城市与农村)和婚姻状况(已婚与单身)似乎不影响接受COVID-19疫苗接种[38人(42.2%)对3人(33.3%)];p = 0.667;25人(36.8%)vs 17人(54.8%);p = 0.433)]。工作年限(10年)显著影响新冠肺炎疫苗接受度[27人(45.8%)对12人(52.2%)];p = 0.029]。受教育程度和月收入对疫苗接种率没有影响(p < 0.05)。相当多的受访者不确定他们为什么应该或不应该接种COVID-19疫苗[49人(92.5%)对35人(83.3%);p = 0.001]。结论:奥卡市医护人员COVID-19疫苗接种率仍然较低。大多数应答者不知道他们为什么应该或不应该接种COVID-19疫苗。因此,我们建议开展强有力的宣传活动,明确解释COVID-19疫苗接种的本质和功效,以提高疫苗接受度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
64
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
Social disparities on PrEP use and awareness among sexual and gender minorities using smartphones in India. Challenges in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by L. braziliensis in four travelers: a case series. Fungal Infections, Treatment and Antifungal Resistance: The Sub-Saharan African Context. Polio: Background and perspective on how international travel can be made safe against polio. Emerging trends in fungal endocarditis: clinical complexity, diagnostic challenges, and therapeutic implications - a case series and literature review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1