Resident Physicians' Perceptions of Trauma Informed Care: Findings from a Small-scale Descriptive Study.

Kansas journal of medicine Pub Date : 2023-10-30 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.17161/kjm.vol16.21000
Ruth Nutting, Kari Nilsen, Rachel Engle, Kyle Wells, Hannah Scoville
{"title":"Resident Physicians' Perceptions of Trauma Informed Care: Findings from a Small-scale Descriptive Study.","authors":"Ruth Nutting, Kari Nilsen, Rachel Engle, Kyle Wells, Hannah Scoville","doi":"10.17161/kjm.vol16.21000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Screening for adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) is a significant component of trauma informed care (TIC), as intervention can mitigate negative health outcomes. However, as few as 4% of physicians with pediatric patients screen and intervene for all ACEs. The authors of this study sought to: 1) understand resident physicians' perceptions of TIC; 2) identify areas of training needed to improve screening and intervention of ACEs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This descriptive study occurred in a large Midwestern Family Medicine residency and involved a convenience sample of 38 resident physicians. Participants completed a survey, which included a total of 22 Likert-scale and open-ended questions. Descriptive frequencies were used to represent Likert-scale responses, and the open-ended questions were analyzed utilizing a thematic analysis approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants identified screening for ACEs as useful. However, they reported a lack of confidence in their ability to screen and intervene. Barriers to screening and intervention also were noted and included lack of time, discomfort in assessment, perceived inability to help, insufficient knowledge and skills, and competing primary care recommendations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Family Medicine residents identified the screening and intervention of ACEs to be important. However, lack of confidence, competing primary care recommendations, and concern for receptiveness can deter residents from screening and intervention. Based on this study's findings, the authors recommend that graduate medical education focuses on building systems of training that provide learners with the knowledge, skills, and resources to routinely screen and intervene for ACEs in primary care.</p>","PeriodicalId":94121,"journal":{"name":"Kansas journal of medicine","volume":"16 ","pages":"264-267"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10635682/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kansas journal of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17161/kjm.vol16.21000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Screening for adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) is a significant component of trauma informed care (TIC), as intervention can mitigate negative health outcomes. However, as few as 4% of physicians with pediatric patients screen and intervene for all ACEs. The authors of this study sought to: 1) understand resident physicians' perceptions of TIC; 2) identify areas of training needed to improve screening and intervention of ACEs.

Methods: This descriptive study occurred in a large Midwestern Family Medicine residency and involved a convenience sample of 38 resident physicians. Participants completed a survey, which included a total of 22 Likert-scale and open-ended questions. Descriptive frequencies were used to represent Likert-scale responses, and the open-ended questions were analyzed utilizing a thematic analysis approach.

Results: Participants identified screening for ACEs as useful. However, they reported a lack of confidence in their ability to screen and intervene. Barriers to screening and intervention also were noted and included lack of time, discomfort in assessment, perceived inability to help, insufficient knowledge and skills, and competing primary care recommendations.

Conclusions: Family Medicine residents identified the screening and intervention of ACEs to be important. However, lack of confidence, competing primary care recommendations, and concern for receptiveness can deter residents from screening and intervention. Based on this study's findings, the authors recommend that graduate medical education focuses on building systems of training that provide learners with the knowledge, skills, and resources to routinely screen and intervene for ACEs in primary care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
住院医师对创伤知情护理的认知:一项小规模描述性研究的结果。
简介:筛查不良童年经历(ace)是创伤知情护理(TIC)的重要组成部分,因为干预可以减轻负面的健康结果。然而,只有4%的儿科医生对所有ace进行筛查和干预。本研究的作者试图:1)了解住院医师对TIC的看法;2)确定需要培训的领域,以改善不良经历的筛查和干预。方法:这项描述性研究发生在中西部一个大型家庭医学住院医师中,涉及38名住院医师的方便样本。参与者完成了一项调查,其中包括22个李克特量表和开放式问题。描述性频率用于表示李克特量表的反应,开放式问题采用主题分析方法进行分析。结果:参与者认为ace筛查是有用的。然而,他们对自己筛查和干预的能力缺乏信心。筛查和干预的障碍也被注意到,包括缺乏时间、评估时的不适、感觉无法提供帮助、知识和技能不足以及相互竞争的初级保健建议。结论:家庭医学居民认为ace的筛查和干预是重要的。然而,缺乏信心、相互竞争的初级保健建议以及对接受性的担忧会阻止居民进行筛查和干预。基于这项研究的发现,作者建议研究生医学教育的重点是建立培训系统,为学习者提供知识、技能和资源,以便在初级保健中常规筛查和干预ace。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Large Left Atrial Myxoma Discovered During Restaging of Breast Cancer. New and Improved Kansas Journal of Medicine: Perspective from the Editor-in-Chief. Challenges in Anesthetic Management in a 25-Year-Old Patient with Ichthyosis. Factors Affecting Parental Intent to Vaccinate Against COVID-19 in the United States. Influence of Bone Cement Augmentation on Complications in Cephalomedullary Nail Fixation of Geriatric Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1