Filter-type Protection Device Retrieval Interfered by Deployed Stent during Subclavian Artery Stenosis Treatment: Case Report and Complication Avoidance Recommendation.

NMC case report journal Pub Date : 2023-10-14 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.2176/jns-nmc.2023-0146
Nobuyuki Mitsui, Manabu Kinoshita, Junji Nakazawa, Hirokazu Ozaki, Teruo Kimura
{"title":"Filter-type Protection Device Retrieval Interfered by Deployed Stent during Subclavian Artery Stenosis Treatment: Case Report and Complication Avoidance Recommendation.","authors":"Nobuyuki Mitsui, Manabu Kinoshita, Junji Nakazawa, Hirokazu Ozaki, Teruo Kimura","doi":"10.2176/jns-nmc.2023-0146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Endovascular treatment is a standard procedure for subclavian artery stenosis or obstruction. However, great care should be taken to avoid embolic complications to the vertebral artery, and several methods have previously been reported. Hence, as surgical procedures become increasingly complicated, unintended issues may arise during treatment. Here, the authors report a case where the filter-type protection device was caught in the stent because the patient moved during treatment, leading to open surgery to recover the filter-type protection device. A 78-year-old female suffering from a left subclavian steal syndrome underwent stenting due to subclavian artery stenosis. The stenotic lesion was approached via the transfemoral route, and a filter-type protection device was advanced to the vertebral artery via the transbrachial route to prevent embolic complications. As the procedure was performed under local anesthesia, the patient moved during stent deployment proximally to the left vertebral artery origin, and the stent unintentionally advanced distally, covering the vertebral artery and obstructing the retrieval catheter for the filter-type protection device to advance. Failed attempts in recovering the filter-type protection device required open surgery for retrieval. Fortunately, there was no postoperative neurological and radiographic complication, ameliorating her chief complaint. The retriever catheter for the protection device should be advanced beyond the vertebral artery orifice just proximal to the protection device before stenting to avoid such complications while also thoroughly considering the type of anesthesia during treatment.","PeriodicalId":101331,"journal":{"name":"NMC case report journal","volume":"10 ","pages":"279-283"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10635904/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NMC case report journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2176/jns-nmc.2023-0146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Endovascular treatment is a standard procedure for subclavian artery stenosis or obstruction. However, great care should be taken to avoid embolic complications to the vertebral artery, and several methods have previously been reported. Hence, as surgical procedures become increasingly complicated, unintended issues may arise during treatment. Here, the authors report a case where the filter-type protection device was caught in the stent because the patient moved during treatment, leading to open surgery to recover the filter-type protection device. A 78-year-old female suffering from a left subclavian steal syndrome underwent stenting due to subclavian artery stenosis. The stenotic lesion was approached via the transfemoral route, and a filter-type protection device was advanced to the vertebral artery via the transbrachial route to prevent embolic complications. As the procedure was performed under local anesthesia, the patient moved during stent deployment proximally to the left vertebral artery origin, and the stent unintentionally advanced distally, covering the vertebral artery and obstructing the retrieval catheter for the filter-type protection device to advance. Failed attempts in recovering the filter-type protection device required open surgery for retrieval. Fortunately, there was no postoperative neurological and radiographic complication, ameliorating her chief complaint. The retriever catheter for the protection device should be advanced beyond the vertebral artery orifice just proximal to the protection device before stenting to avoid such complications while also thoroughly considering the type of anesthesia during treatment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
锁骨下动脉狭窄治疗中过滤器式保护装置回收受支架部署干扰:1例报告及避免并发症的建议。
血管内治疗是锁骨下动脉狭窄或梗阻的标准治疗方法。然而,应该非常小心,以避免栓塞并发症的椎动脉,并有几种方法已被报道。因此,随着外科手术变得越来越复杂,在治疗过程中可能会出现意想不到的问题。在这里,作者报告了一例由于患者在治疗过程中移动导致过滤器型保护装置卡在支架内,导致开放手术恢复过滤器型保护装置的病例。一位78岁的女性患有左锁骨下窃血综合征,由于锁骨下动脉狭窄,接受了支架植入术。经股动脉入路狭窄病灶,经肱动脉入路椎动脉推进滤过式保护装置,防止栓塞并发症。由于手术是在局部麻醉下进行的,在支架部署过程中,患者向左侧椎动脉起源近端移动,支架不自觉地向远端移动,覆盖椎动脉,阻塞了过滤式保护装置前进的取出导管。试图恢复过滤器式保护装置失败,需要开腹手术进行恢复。幸运的是,术后没有神经学和影像学并发症,改善了她的主诉。在支架置入前,保护装置的取物导管应提前至离保护装置近端的椎动脉口以外,以避免此类并发症的发生,同时在治疗过程中也应充分考虑麻醉的类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Chronic Subdural Hematoma in the Posterior Fossa Associated with Hearing Impairment during Warfarin Therapy, Improved by Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization: A Case Report. Recurrence of Solitary Fibrous Tumor in the Spinal Cord Following Gross Total and Subtotal Resection: A Case Report of Recurrence 19 Years of Post-total Resection and Systematic Literature Review. Trigeminal Neuralgia Associated with a Variant of Primitive Trigeminal Artery: A Case Report. A Late Complication Related to Percutaneous Implantable Leads for Spinal Cord Stimulation: Myelopathy due to Fibrous Scar Tissue. Endovascular Coiling for a Ruptured Middle Cerebral Artery-lenticulostriate Artery Bifurcation Aneurysm Suspected to Be a Pseudoaneurysm: A Case Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1