Perceptual quality of 4K-resolution video content compared to HD

G. Wallendael, Paulien Coppens, Tom Paridaens, Niels Van Kets, W. V. D. Broeck, P. Lambert
{"title":"Perceptual quality of 4K-resolution video content compared to HD","authors":"G. Wallendael, Paulien Coppens, Tom Paridaens, Niels Van Kets, W. V. D. Broeck, P. Lambert","doi":"10.1109/QoMEX.2016.7498935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the introduction of 4K UHD video and display resolution, questions arise on the perceptual differences between 4K UHD and upsampled HD video content. In this paper, a striped pair comparison has been performed on a diverse set of 4K UHD video sources. The goal was to subjectively assess the perceived sharpness of 4K UHD and downscaled/upscaled HD video. A striped pair comparison has been applied in order to make the test as straightforward as possible for a non-expert participant population. Under these conditions and over this set of sequences, on average, on 54.8% of the sequences (17 out of 31), 4K UHD resolution content could be identified as being sharper compared to its HD down and upsampled alternative. The probabilities in which 4K UHD could be differentiated from downscaled/upscaled HD range from 83.3% for the easiest to assess sequence down to 39.7% for the most difficult sequence. Although significance tests demonstrate there is a positive sharpness difference from camera quality 4K UHD content compared to the HD downscaled/upscaled variations, it is very content dependent and all circumstances have been chosen in favor of the 4K UHD representation. The results of this test can contribute to the research process of developing metrics indicating visibility of high resolution features within specific content.","PeriodicalId":6645,"journal":{"name":"2016 Eighth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX)","volume":"30 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 Eighth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/QoMEX.2016.7498935","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

With the introduction of 4K UHD video and display resolution, questions arise on the perceptual differences between 4K UHD and upsampled HD video content. In this paper, a striped pair comparison has been performed on a diverse set of 4K UHD video sources. The goal was to subjectively assess the perceived sharpness of 4K UHD and downscaled/upscaled HD video. A striped pair comparison has been applied in order to make the test as straightforward as possible for a non-expert participant population. Under these conditions and over this set of sequences, on average, on 54.8% of the sequences (17 out of 31), 4K UHD resolution content could be identified as being sharper compared to its HD down and upsampled alternative. The probabilities in which 4K UHD could be differentiated from downscaled/upscaled HD range from 83.3% for the easiest to assess sequence down to 39.7% for the most difficult sequence. Although significance tests demonstrate there is a positive sharpness difference from camera quality 4K UHD content compared to the HD downscaled/upscaled variations, it is very content dependent and all circumstances have been chosen in favor of the 4K UHD representation. The results of this test can contribute to the research process of developing metrics indicating visibility of high resolution features within specific content.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与高清相比,4k分辨率视频内容的感知质量
随着4K超高清视频和显示分辨率的引入,出现了4K超高清和上采样高清视频内容之间感知差异的问题。本文对一组不同的4K UHD视频源进行了条纹对比较。目标是主观地评估4K UHD和缩小/升级高清视频的感知清晰度。为了使测试尽可能简单地适用于非专业参与者群体,应用了条纹配对比较。在这些条件下,在这组序列上,平均54.8%的序列(31个序列中的17个),4K UHD分辨率的内容可以被识别为比其高清上下采样的替代品更清晰。区分4K UHD和缩小/扩大HD的概率范围从最容易评估序列的83.3%到最难评估序列的39.7%。尽管显著性检验表明,与高清缩小/放大的变化相比,相机质量4K UHD内容的清晰度存在正差异,但它非常依赖于内容,并且所有情况都选择了有利于4K UHD表示的情况。该测试的结果有助于开发指标的研究过程,表明特定内容中高分辨率特征的可见性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Perception and automated assessment of audio quality in user generated content: An improved model Software to Stress Test Image Quality Estimators Closing the gap: Visual quality assessment considering viewing conditions Towards training naïve participants for a perceptual annotation task designed for experts Spatio-temporal error concealment technique for high order multiple description coding schemes including subjective assessment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1