The Future of Zero Continuous Flare Operation at Greater Bongkot North Field

Rattachai Nunthaworrarat, Suchart Srivaranon
{"title":"The Future of Zero Continuous Flare Operation at Greater Bongkot North Field","authors":"Rattachai Nunthaworrarat, Suchart Srivaranon","doi":"10.4043/31565-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The Greater Bongkot North (GBN)'s condensate stabilization system initially utilizes multi-stage flashing concept through the multi-stage separators. Most of the flashing gas at the last stage separator could not be recovered as being operated at very low pressure (0.05 barg) resulting in the continuous flaring through Low Pressure (LP) Flare Header at the Production Platform of the GBN since 1st operation day. Recovery of the unrecoverable low-pressure gas has been unsolved since then.\n Regarding lower gas nomination forecasted and exported condensate rate in low condensate production mode, LP flare rate is being simulated at 1-3 MMSCFD whilst the existing condensate and gas recovery system shows the available capacity left over even the field potential is maintained. This information energized the opportunity of Recovery Scheme by boosting the pressure of LP Flare Gas and feeding the recovered gas to the existing FGRU compressor within the minimal modification scope. Entire feasible recovery options had been technically examined including essential requirements of modification to evaluate the Pros and Cons on each development scenarios.\n Key engineering challenge on recovery of the low-pressure heavy flare gas is the closed recirculation of recovered hydrocarbon which wastefully occupies the system capacity. Selection on the returning point of the recovered gas is crucial to minimize the recirculation while increasing production yield. The selected option provides less modification works whereas the entire recovered gas feeding back to the existing FGRU compressor is feasible while the existing facilities at its maximum capacity are utilized and new equipment installation requires only one (Wet Screw) compressor and one liquid recovery (Vertical in-line centrifugal) pump. Each equipment was technically selected through evaluated technical specifications and limitation of installation spaces. Furthermore, the installation scenarios on the aging production platform are key challenge as deck extension, which new equipment are installed, is heavy-lifted, and installed on the existing lower deck of Production Platform using the available margin of platform load on the existing piles. Cost estimation is conducted together with economic evaluation for investment decision. The project is budgetary approved providing an attractive positive NPV. The economic evaluation results in positive NPV mainly due to the condensate gain from the flare gas recovery insisting that greenhouse gas reduction project could be performed in the techno-economical way.\n The implementation of GBN New LP Flare Recovery scheme will soonest be getting started by FEED and Construction phases accordingly to shape up essential details of required engineering aspects to make the start-up of this project meets the timeline supporting Sustainable Development framework (Green-house gas reduction) as PTTEP strategic directions.","PeriodicalId":11011,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Thu, March 24, 2022","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Thu, March 24, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4043/31565-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Greater Bongkot North (GBN)'s condensate stabilization system initially utilizes multi-stage flashing concept through the multi-stage separators. Most of the flashing gas at the last stage separator could not be recovered as being operated at very low pressure (0.05 barg) resulting in the continuous flaring through Low Pressure (LP) Flare Header at the Production Platform of the GBN since 1st operation day. Recovery of the unrecoverable low-pressure gas has been unsolved since then. Regarding lower gas nomination forecasted and exported condensate rate in low condensate production mode, LP flare rate is being simulated at 1-3 MMSCFD whilst the existing condensate and gas recovery system shows the available capacity left over even the field potential is maintained. This information energized the opportunity of Recovery Scheme by boosting the pressure of LP Flare Gas and feeding the recovered gas to the existing FGRU compressor within the minimal modification scope. Entire feasible recovery options had been technically examined including essential requirements of modification to evaluate the Pros and Cons on each development scenarios. Key engineering challenge on recovery of the low-pressure heavy flare gas is the closed recirculation of recovered hydrocarbon which wastefully occupies the system capacity. Selection on the returning point of the recovered gas is crucial to minimize the recirculation while increasing production yield. The selected option provides less modification works whereas the entire recovered gas feeding back to the existing FGRU compressor is feasible while the existing facilities at its maximum capacity are utilized and new equipment installation requires only one (Wet Screw) compressor and one liquid recovery (Vertical in-line centrifugal) pump. Each equipment was technically selected through evaluated technical specifications and limitation of installation spaces. Furthermore, the installation scenarios on the aging production platform are key challenge as deck extension, which new equipment are installed, is heavy-lifted, and installed on the existing lower deck of Production Platform using the available margin of platform load on the existing piles. Cost estimation is conducted together with economic evaluation for investment decision. The project is budgetary approved providing an attractive positive NPV. The economic evaluation results in positive NPV mainly due to the condensate gain from the flare gas recovery insisting that greenhouse gas reduction project could be performed in the techno-economical way. The implementation of GBN New LP Flare Recovery scheme will soonest be getting started by FEED and Construction phases accordingly to shape up essential details of required engineering aspects to make the start-up of this project meets the timeline supporting Sustainable Development framework (Green-house gas reduction) as PTTEP strategic directions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大邦果北部油田零连续火炬操作的未来
Greater Bongkot North (GBN)的凝析油稳定系统最初通过多级分离器采用多级闪蒸概念。由于在极低的压力(0.05巴)下运行,最后一级分离器的大部分闪蒸气体无法回收,导致GBN生产平台的低压(LP)火炬箱从第一天开始持续燃烧。从那时起,无法开采的低压气的开采一直没有解决。对于低凝析油生产模式下较低的天然气指定预测和出口凝析油率,模拟的LP耀斑率为1-3 MMSCFD,而现有的凝析油和天然气回收系统显示,即使保持了油田潜力,剩余的可用产能也能保持。该信息通过提高LP火炬气的压力,并在最小的修改范围内将回收的气体送入现有的FGRU压缩机,为回收方案提供了机会。对所有可行的恢复方案进行了技术审查,包括基本的修改要求,以评估每个开发方案的利弊。低压重火炬气回收的关键工程难题是回收烃的密闭再循环,浪费了系统容量。选择回收气的回流点对于减少再循环和提高产量至关重要。所选择的方案提供了较少的改造工程,而整个回收气体反馈到现有的FGRU压缩机是可行的,同时利用了现有设施的最大产能,新设备安装只需要一台(湿螺杆)压缩机和一台液体回收(垂直在线离心)泵。每台设备都是通过评估技术规格和安装空间限制来进行技术选择的。此外,老化的生产平台上的安装方案是关键的挑战,因为甲板扩展,新设备的安装,是重载的,并利用现有的平台荷载余量在现有的生产平台的下甲板上安装。成本估算与经济评价一起进行投资决策。该项目已获得预算批准,提供了具有吸引力的正净现值。经济评价结果显示净现值为正,主要是由于火炬气回收的凝析油收益,坚持温室气体减排项目可以从技术经济的角度进行。GBN新LP火炬回收计划的实施将很快在FEED和施工阶段开始,从而形成所需工程方面的基本细节,以使该项目的启动符合支持可持续发展框架(温室气体减排)作为PTTEP战略方向的时间表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Integrated Advance Petrophysical Evaluation for Heterolithic Clastics Reservoir Characterization Optimization in Malay Basin The Transformation Journey and Key Critical Success Factors of Turbomachinery Digital Remote Monitoring Biggest Wells Plug and Abandonment Campaign – Effective Management & Best Practices Implementation Zawtika Deferment Management Enhancement: A Systematic Way to Unlock Gas Potential for Optimized Operations Breakthrough Integration of 3-1/2? Tubing in 8-1/2? Hole Cemented Monobore for Successful Tubing Stem Test TST
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1