Approximate Confidence Distribution Computing

S. Thornton, Wentao Li, Min‐ge Xie
{"title":"Approximate Confidence Distribution Computing","authors":"S. Thornton, Wentao Li, Min‐ge Xie","doi":"10.51387/23-nejsds38","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Approximate confidence distribution computing (ACDC) offers a new take on the rapidly developing field of likelihood-free inference from within a frequentist framework. The appeal of this computational method for statistical inference hinges upon the concept of a confidence distribution, a special type of estimator which is defined with respect to the repeated sampling principle. An ACDC method provides frequentist validation for computational inference in problems with unknown or intractable likelihoods. The main theoretical contribution of this work is the identification of a matching condition necessary for frequentist validity of inference from this method. In addition to providing an example of how a modern understanding of confidence distribution theory can be used to connect Bayesian and frequentist inferential paradigms, we present a case to expand the current scope of so-called approximate Bayesian inference to include non-Bayesian inference by targeting a confidence distribution rather than a posterior. The main practical contribution of this work is the development of a data-driven approach to drive ACDC in both Bayesian or frequentist contexts. The ACDC algorithm is data-driven by the selection of a data-dependent proposal function, the structure of which is quite general and adaptable to many settings. We explore three numerical examples that both verify the theoretical arguments in the development of ACDC and suggest instances in which ACDC outperform approximate Bayesian computing methods computationally.","PeriodicalId":94360,"journal":{"name":"The New England Journal of Statistics in Data Science","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The New England Journal of Statistics in Data Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51387/23-nejsds38","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Approximate confidence distribution computing (ACDC) offers a new take on the rapidly developing field of likelihood-free inference from within a frequentist framework. The appeal of this computational method for statistical inference hinges upon the concept of a confidence distribution, a special type of estimator which is defined with respect to the repeated sampling principle. An ACDC method provides frequentist validation for computational inference in problems with unknown or intractable likelihoods. The main theoretical contribution of this work is the identification of a matching condition necessary for frequentist validity of inference from this method. In addition to providing an example of how a modern understanding of confidence distribution theory can be used to connect Bayesian and frequentist inferential paradigms, we present a case to expand the current scope of so-called approximate Bayesian inference to include non-Bayesian inference by targeting a confidence distribution rather than a posterior. The main practical contribution of this work is the development of a data-driven approach to drive ACDC in both Bayesian or frequentist contexts. The ACDC algorithm is data-driven by the selection of a data-dependent proposal function, the structure of which is quite general and adaptable to many settings. We explore three numerical examples that both verify the theoretical arguments in the development of ACDC and suggest instances in which ACDC outperform approximate Bayesian computing methods computationally.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
近似置信分布计算
近似置信分布计算(ACDC)在频率论框架下为快速发展的无似然推理领域提供了一种新的思路。这种计算方法对统计推断的吸引力在于置信分布的概念,这是一种特殊类型的估计量,它是根据重复抽样原则定义的。ACDC方法为未知或难处理似然问题的计算推理提供了频率验证。这项工作的主要理论贡献是确定了从该方法推断的频率有效性所必需的匹配条件。除了提供一个例子,说明如何使用现代的信心分布理论来连接贝叶斯和频率论推理范式,我们还提出了一个案例,以扩大所谓的近似贝叶斯推理的当前范围,通过针对信心分布而不是后验来包括非贝叶斯推理。这项工作的主要实际贡献是开发了一种数据驱动的方法来驱动贝叶斯或频率上下文中的ACDC。ACDC算法是通过选择一个与数据相关的提议函数来实现数据驱动的,该提议函数的结构具有相当的通用性和适应性。我们探索了三个数值例子,既验证了ACDC发展中的理论论点,又提出了ACDC在计算上优于近似贝叶斯计算方法的实例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Modeling Multivariate Spatial Dependencies Using Graphical Models. Effect of model space priors on statistical inference with model uncertainty. Bayesian Variable Selection in Double Generalized Linear Tweedie Spatial Process Models Bayesian D-Optimal Design of Experiments with Quantitative and Qualitative Responses Construction of Supersaturated Designs with Small Coherence for Variable Selection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1