Baudrillard and Heidegger: Between Two Deaths

IF 2.7 2区 社会学 Q1 CULTURAL STUDIES Theory Culture & Society Pub Date : 2022-02-08 DOI:10.1177/02632764211070279
Vanessa Anne-Cecile Freerks
{"title":"Baudrillard and Heidegger: Between Two Deaths","authors":"Vanessa Anne-Cecile Freerks","doi":"10.1177/02632764211070279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, I compare the ways in which Baudrillard and Heidegger seek to bring attention to the importance of death for our personal existential situation which has now become repressed in conceptions of existence and society. Heidegger critiques public conceptions of death that serve to cover up its importance. Less well known is that, somewhat in parallel fashion, Baudrillard charts a ‘genealogy’ of the ‘extradition’ of the dead from the centre of the social and he claims that we live currently in a death denying society. This reduces the meaning of our own impending deaths. However, unlike Heidegger, Baudrillard’s ‘genealogical’ critique of the exclusion of death in modern society is not a one-way dismissal because he proposes an alternative social role for death in the form of ‘primitive symbolic exchange’.","PeriodicalId":48276,"journal":{"name":"Theory Culture & Society","volume":"91 1","pages":"87 - 104"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory Culture & Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764211070279","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this article, I compare the ways in which Baudrillard and Heidegger seek to bring attention to the importance of death for our personal existential situation which has now become repressed in conceptions of existence and society. Heidegger critiques public conceptions of death that serve to cover up its importance. Less well known is that, somewhat in parallel fashion, Baudrillard charts a ‘genealogy’ of the ‘extradition’ of the dead from the centre of the social and he claims that we live currently in a death denying society. This reduces the meaning of our own impending deaths. However, unlike Heidegger, Baudrillard’s ‘genealogical’ critique of the exclusion of death in modern society is not a one-way dismissal because he proposes an alternative social role for death in the form of ‘primitive symbolic exchange’.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鲍德里亚与海德格尔:在两种死亡之间
在这篇文章中,我比较了鲍德里亚和海德格尔试图让人们注意到死亡对我们个人存在处境的重要性的方式,这种处境现在已经被存在和社会的概念所压抑。海德格尔批判了掩盖死亡重要性的公众死亡观念。不太为人所知的是,在某种程度上以类似的方式,鲍德里亚描绘了从社会中心“引渡”死者的“谱系”,他声称我们目前生活在一个否认死亡的社会中。这降低了我们即将到来的死亡的意义。然而,与海德格尔不同的是,鲍德里亚对现代社会排斥死亡的“系谱学”批判并不是一种单向的否定,因为他以“原始符号交换”的形式为死亡提出了另一种社会角色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Theory, Culture & Society is a highly ranked, high impact factor, rigorously peer reviewed journal that publishes original research and review articles in the social and cultural sciences. Launched in 1982 to cater for the resurgence of interest in culture within contemporary social science, Theory, Culture & Society provides a forum for articles which theorize the relationship between culture and society. Theory, Culture & Society is at the cutting edge of recent developments in social and cultural theory. The journal has helped to break down some of the disciplinary barriers between the humanities and the social sciences by opening up a wide range of new questions in cultural theory.
期刊最新文献
Latour and the Question of Politics: A Constitutional Reading The Land of the Moderns: The Sense of Latour’s Pragmatism With and after the Inquiry: How Do We Pragmatically Move from the Moderns to the Contemporaries? Bruno Latour and Religion: A Strange Parishioner Artificial Intelligence and the Production of Judicial Truth
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1