3D seismogenic model of the 2015 Gorkha earthquake and subsequent seismic risk

IF 1.6 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS 地球物理学报 Pub Date : 2018-06-01 DOI:10.6038/CJG2018L0371
Q. Yao, Xi-wei Xu, H. Xing, Jia Cheng, Guoyan Jiang, Weiyu Ma, Jie Liu, Wen Yang
{"title":"3D seismogenic model of the 2015 Gorkha earthquake and subsequent seismic risk","authors":"Q. Yao, Xi-wei Xu, H. Xing, Jia Cheng, Guoyan Jiang, Weiyu Ma, Jie Liu, Wen Yang","doi":"10.6038/CJG2018L0371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On April 25th, 2015, the moment magnitude (M-w) 7. 8 Gorkha earthquake, Nepal occurred in Himalaya orogenic belt, which seems insufficient to release the accumulated energy as suggested previously. The following seismic risk assessments are mostly based on the two dimensional or pseudo-three dimensional inversions of tectonic deformation. Here we analyze the relationship between the main shock and biggest aftershock of the 2015 Gorkha earthquake sequence, and its unevenness in time and space. Combining focal mechanism solutions, crustal velocity structure, relocated aftershocks, and inversion results from InSAR, we construct a three dimensional model which changes along both the strike and dip directions of the Main Himalayan Thrust. The finite element method with nonlinear friction is used to calculate the fault behavior and block deformation in one earthquake recurrence period. Comparison between the forward calculation results and the co-seismic deformation observed from InSAR, and co-seismic slip inverted from deformation observations, and time-space evolution of historical earthquakes revealed that the three dimension model is close to the reality. The results suggest two potential seismic risk regions in the future: a big earthquake might be located in the east of the 1934 Bihar-Nepal M-w similar to 8. 1 earthquake, and a moderate to major event might take place to the southeast of the aftershock M(w)7. 3 earthquake.","PeriodicalId":55257,"journal":{"name":"地球物理学报","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"地球物理学报","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6038/CJG2018L0371","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On April 25th, 2015, the moment magnitude (M-w) 7. 8 Gorkha earthquake, Nepal occurred in Himalaya orogenic belt, which seems insufficient to release the accumulated energy as suggested previously. The following seismic risk assessments are mostly based on the two dimensional or pseudo-three dimensional inversions of tectonic deformation. Here we analyze the relationship between the main shock and biggest aftershock of the 2015 Gorkha earthquake sequence, and its unevenness in time and space. Combining focal mechanism solutions, crustal velocity structure, relocated aftershocks, and inversion results from InSAR, we construct a three dimensional model which changes along both the strike and dip directions of the Main Himalayan Thrust. The finite element method with nonlinear friction is used to calculate the fault behavior and block deformation in one earthquake recurrence period. Comparison between the forward calculation results and the co-seismic deformation observed from InSAR, and co-seismic slip inverted from deformation observations, and time-space evolution of historical earthquakes revealed that the three dimension model is close to the reality. The results suggest two potential seismic risk regions in the future: a big earthquake might be located in the east of the 1934 Bihar-Nepal M-w similar to 8. 1 earthquake, and a moderate to major event might take place to the southeast of the aftershock M(w)7. 3 earthquake.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2015年廓尔喀地震三维孕震模型及后续地震风险
2015年4月25日,震级(M-w)为7。8日尼泊尔廓尔喀地震发生在喜马拉雅造山带,似乎不足以释放之前所说的积累的能量。以下地震危险性评价大多是基于构造变形的二维或拟三维反演。本文分析了2015年廓尔喀地震序列的主震与最大余震的关系及其时空的不均匀性。结合震源机制解、地壳速度结构、重新定位余震和InSAR反演结果,构建了喜马拉雅主逆冲构造沿走向和走向变化的三维模型。采用非线性摩擦有限元法计算了一个地震重复周期内的断层行为和块体变形。正演计算结果与InSAR观测的同震变形、变形观测反演的同震滑动以及历史地震的时空演变对比表明,三维模型更接近实际。结果表明,未来有两个潜在的地震危险区:1934年比哈尔邦-尼泊尔M-w的东部可能会发生一次大地震,类似于8级地震。1级地震,余震M(w)7的东南部可能发生一次中大型地震。3地震。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
地球物理学报
地球物理学报 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
28.60%
发文量
9449
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Speech habits Nouns Verbs Paragraphs Writing conventions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1