FEEDING VALUE OF BIRD’S–FOOT TREFOIL (LOTUS CORNICULATUS L.) CULTIVAR UNDER CONDITIONS OF THE CENTRAL NORTHERN PART OF BULGARIA

B. Churkova, T. Bozhanska, Y. Naydenova
{"title":"FEEDING VALUE OF BIRD’S–FOOT TREFOIL (LOTUS CORNICULATUS L.) CULTIVAR UNDER CONDITIONS OF THE CENTRAL NORTHERN PART OF BULGARIA","authors":"B. Churkova, T. Bozhanska, Y. Naydenova","doi":"10.7904/2068-4738-VII(14)-38","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the period 2010–2012 in the Research Institute of Mountain Stockbreeding and Agriculture–Troyan was conducted a study on the Forage (energy and protein) Feeding Value of the Following Bird's–foot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus L.) Cultivars Introduced in Bulgaria: 'Bright', 'Georgia 1' (USA), 'Nueltin' (USA), 'Witt', 'Pardee' (USA), 'Roseau' (USA), 'Steadfast', 'Trevig' (USA) with origin the USA. The changes of proteins and fibers, analyzed by means of classical chemical analysis such as, Weende and Van Soest analysis, in vitro enzyme digestibility of organic substance of eight bird's–foot–trefoil cultivars were compared with indicators of the standard cultivar 'Targovishte 1'. The crude protein content in the studied bird's–foot–trefoil cultivars varied from 16.66 ('Witt') to 20.50 % ('Pardee') dry matter. Average for the period 'Witt' cultivar was distinguished by the lowest content of crude fiber (5.48 % below the standard) and the highest dry matter digestibility–63.29 % (1.14 % over the standard). The share of neutral detergent fibers in dry matter of bird's–foot trefoil cultivar of 'Pardee' was 7.4 % less in comparison with 'Targovishte' cultivar. In cell wall composition of 'Roseau' cultivar, hemicellulose prevailed at the highest level, and fiber fractions of ADF and ADL were at the lowest level, which presupposed a high quality and good forage digestibility. According to net energy feeding value, the average values of studied cultivars did not exceed the standard cultivar. 'Pardee' cultivar had the highest feeding value: TDP (PBD): 160.0 g kg –1 , PDIN: 128.7 and PDIE: 101.5 g kg –1 . Keyword: bird's–foot trefoil cultivars, chemical composition, in vitro digestibility, energy and protein nutritional value.","PeriodicalId":8682,"journal":{"name":"Banat's Journal of Biotechnology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Banat's Journal of Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7904/2068-4738-VII(14)-38","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

During the period 2010–2012 in the Research Institute of Mountain Stockbreeding and Agriculture–Troyan was conducted a study on the Forage (energy and protein) Feeding Value of the Following Bird's–foot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus L.) Cultivars Introduced in Bulgaria: 'Bright', 'Georgia 1' (USA), 'Nueltin' (USA), 'Witt', 'Pardee' (USA), 'Roseau' (USA), 'Steadfast', 'Trevig' (USA) with origin the USA. The changes of proteins and fibers, analyzed by means of classical chemical analysis such as, Weende and Van Soest analysis, in vitro enzyme digestibility of organic substance of eight bird's–foot–trefoil cultivars were compared with indicators of the standard cultivar 'Targovishte 1'. The crude protein content in the studied bird's–foot–trefoil cultivars varied from 16.66 ('Witt') to 20.50 % ('Pardee') dry matter. Average for the period 'Witt' cultivar was distinguished by the lowest content of crude fiber (5.48 % below the standard) and the highest dry matter digestibility–63.29 % (1.14 % over the standard). The share of neutral detergent fibers in dry matter of bird's–foot trefoil cultivar of 'Pardee' was 7.4 % less in comparison with 'Targovishte' cultivar. In cell wall composition of 'Roseau' cultivar, hemicellulose prevailed at the highest level, and fiber fractions of ADF and ADL were at the lowest level, which presupposed a high quality and good forage digestibility. According to net energy feeding value, the average values of studied cultivars did not exceed the standard cultivar. 'Pardee' cultivar had the highest feeding value: TDP (PBD): 160.0 g kg –1 , PDIN: 128.7 and PDIE: 101.5 g kg –1 . Keyword: bird's–foot trefoil cultivars, chemical composition, in vitro digestibility, energy and protein nutritional value.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鸟足三叶草的摄食价值保加利亚中北部条件下的栽培品种
2010-2012年,在troyan山区畜牧农业研究所对下列鸟脚三叶草(Lotus corniculatus L.)的饲料(能量和蛋白质)摄食价值进行了研究。保加利亚引进的品种:'Bright', 'Georgia 1'(美国),'Nueltin'(美国),'Witt', 'Pardee'(美国),'Roseau'(美国),'踏实','Trevig'(美国),原产美国。采用经典化学分析法(如Weende分析法和Van Soest分析法)分析了8个鸟脚三叶草品种的蛋白质和纤维的变化,并与标准品种Targovishte 1进行了有机物体外酶消化率的比较。所研究的鸟脚三叶草品种的粗蛋白质含量在干物质的16.66% ('Witt')到20.50% ('Pardee')之间变化。“威特”品种的粗纤维含量最低(低于标准5.48%),干物质消化率最高(63.29%),高于标准1.14%。鸟脚三叶草‘Pardee’品种干物质中中性洗涤纤维的比例比‘Targovishte’品种低7.4%。‘Roseau’品种细胞壁成分中半纤维素含量最高,ADF和ADL纤维含量最低,具有较高的品质和较好的饲料消化率。按净能采食量计算,各品种平均值均未超过标准品种。“Pardee”品种的饲用价值最高,TDP (PBD)为160.0 g kg -1, PDIN为128.7,PDIE为101.5 g kg -1。关键词:鸟脚三叶,化学成分,体外消化率,能量和蛋白质营养价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Chemical constituents and antibacterial activity of essential oil of Vitex rotundifolia from Southern Vietnam Chemical composition and antibacterial activities of ethanolic extract from rhizomes and aerial parts of Typhonium lineare Hett. and V.D. Nguyen (Araceae) Medicinal plants as sources of selenium and natural antioxidants Changes in elemental composition of Lewis carcinoma tumors in mice due to the supply of water–ethanolic extracts of Artemisia dracunculus and Pastinaca sativa In vitro phytochemical and antibacterial activity of traditional hemorrhoid herbal medicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1