Power and Productivity: Institutions, Ideology, and Technology in Political Economy

Y. Benkler
{"title":"Power and Productivity: Institutions, Ideology, and Technology in Political Economy","authors":"Y. Benkler","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3503962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Market democracies struggle with economic insecurity and growing inequality, presenting new threats to democracy. The revival of “political economy” offers a frame for understanding the relationship between productivity and justice in market societies. It reintegrates power and the social and material context—institutions, ideology, and technology—into our analysis of social relations of production, or how we make and distribute what we need and want to have. Organizations and individuals, alone and in networks, struggle over how much of a society’s production happens in a market sphere, how much happens in nonmarket relations, and how embedded those aspects that do occur in markets are in social relations of mutual obligation and solidarism. These struggles at the micro, meso, and macro levels involve efforts to shape institutions, ideology, and technology in ways that trade off productivity and power, both in the short and long term, including through the production and exploitation of atavistic status-hierarchies, primarily race, gender, and immigration. The outcome of this struggle shapes the divergent paths that diverse market societies take, from oligarchic to egalitarian, and their stability as pluralistic democracies.","PeriodicalId":18516,"journal":{"name":"Microeconomics: Production","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microeconomics: Production","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3503962","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Market democracies struggle with economic insecurity and growing inequality, presenting new threats to democracy. The revival of “political economy” offers a frame for understanding the relationship between productivity and justice in market societies. It reintegrates power and the social and material context—institutions, ideology, and technology—into our analysis of social relations of production, or how we make and distribute what we need and want to have. Organizations and individuals, alone and in networks, struggle over how much of a society’s production happens in a market sphere, how much happens in nonmarket relations, and how embedded those aspects that do occur in markets are in social relations of mutual obligation and solidarism. These struggles at the micro, meso, and macro levels involve efforts to shape institutions, ideology, and technology in ways that trade off productivity and power, both in the short and long term, including through the production and exploitation of atavistic status-hierarchies, primarily race, gender, and immigration. The outcome of this struggle shapes the divergent paths that diverse market societies take, from oligarchic to egalitarian, and their stability as pluralistic democracies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
权力与生产力:政治经济学中的制度、意识形态和技术
市场民主国家与经济不安全和日益加剧的不平等作斗争,这对民主构成了新的威胁。“政治经济学”的复兴为理解市场社会中生产力与正义之间的关系提供了一个框架。它将权力、社会和物质环境——制度、意识形态和技术——重新整合到我们对社会生产关系的分析中,或者我们如何制造和分配我们需要和想要拥有的东西。组织和个人,无论是单独还是在网络中,都在为社会生产中有多少发生在市场领域,有多少发生在非市场关系中,以及市场中发生的那些方面如何嵌入相互义务和团结的社会关系中而斗争。这些在微观、中观和宏观层面上的斗争包括努力塑造制度、意识形态和技术,以在短期和长期内权衡生产力和权力的方式,包括通过生产和利用返祖的地位等级,主要是种族、性别和移民。这场斗争的结果塑造了不同市场社会所走的不同道路,从寡头政治到平等主义,以及它们作为多元民主国家的稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pricing the Pharmaceuticals When the Ability to Pay Differs: Taking Vertical Equity Seriously Dual Role Platforms and Search Order Distortion Monopoly, Product Quality and Information Disclosure Production Approach Markup Estimators Often Measure Input Wedges Successful, but not Too Much: Managing Platform Complementors in the Presence of Network Effects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1