Requirements clinic: Third party inspection methodology and practice for improving the quality of software requirements specifications

Shinobu Saito, Mutsuki Takeuchi, Masatoshi Hiraoka, T. Kitani, M. Aoyama
{"title":"Requirements clinic: Third party inspection methodology and practice for improving the quality of software requirements specifications","authors":"Shinobu Saito, Mutsuki Takeuchi, Masatoshi Hiraoka, T. Kitani, M. Aoyama","doi":"10.1109/RE.2013.6636732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We have been involved in a number of large-scale software development projects, which might lead to loss of millions of dollars if failed. The quality of SRS (Software Requirements Specification) is the key to success of the software development. Review and inspection are common practices for the verification and validation of SRS. However, verification techniques used in projects might be characterized as ad hoc. In this article, we propose requirements clinic, a third party inspection methodology for improving the quality of the SRS. In order to systematically inspect a SRS, we developed a perspective-based inspection methodology based on PQM (Pragmatic Quality Model) of SRS. PQM is derived from IEEE Std. 830 from the perspective of pragmatic quality. To inspect a SRS according to PQM, we identified 198 inspection points, which lead to a quality score between 0 and 100. The requirements clinic advises to the requirements engineering team by a comprehensive quality inspection report including quality score, benchmark and SRS patterns for improvement. Since 2010, we have been practicing the methodology to a variety of development projects, and revealed an average of 10.6 ROI in 12 projects. We also discuss the feasibility of the methodology and lessons learned from the practices.","PeriodicalId":6342,"journal":{"name":"2013 21st IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)","volume":"35 1","pages":"290-295"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 21st IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RE.2013.6636732","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

We have been involved in a number of large-scale software development projects, which might lead to loss of millions of dollars if failed. The quality of SRS (Software Requirements Specification) is the key to success of the software development. Review and inspection are common practices for the verification and validation of SRS. However, verification techniques used in projects might be characterized as ad hoc. In this article, we propose requirements clinic, a third party inspection methodology for improving the quality of the SRS. In order to systematically inspect a SRS, we developed a perspective-based inspection methodology based on PQM (Pragmatic Quality Model) of SRS. PQM is derived from IEEE Std. 830 from the perspective of pragmatic quality. To inspect a SRS according to PQM, we identified 198 inspection points, which lead to a quality score between 0 and 100. The requirements clinic advises to the requirements engineering team by a comprehensive quality inspection report including quality score, benchmark and SRS patterns for improvement. Since 2010, we have been practicing the methodology to a variety of development projects, and revealed an average of 10.6 ROI in 12 projects. We also discuss the feasibility of the methodology and lessons learned from the practices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
需求诊所:用于提高软件需求规格说明质量的第三方检查方法和实践
我们参与了许多大型软件开发项目,如果失败可能会导致数百万美元的损失。软件需求规范(SRS)的质量是软件开发成功的关键。评审和检查是SRS验证和确认的常用做法。然而,项目中使用的验证技术可能被描述为特别的。在本文中,我们提出了需求诊所,一个第三方的检查方法,以提高质量的SRS。为了系统地检查SRS,我们基于SRS的PQM(语用质量模型)开发了一种基于视角的检查方法。PQM从实用质量的角度衍生自IEEE Std. 830。为了根据PQM检查SRS,我们确定了198个检查点,这些检查点导致质量得分在0到100之间。需求诊所通过一份全面的质量检查报告,包括质量分数、基准和SRS模式,向需求工程团队提出改进建议。自2010年以来,我们一直在各种开发项目中实践该方法,并在12个项目中显示了平均10.6的ROI。我们还讨论了方法的可行性和从实践中获得的经验教训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Using defect taxonomies for requirements validation in industrial projects A tool implementation of the unified requirements modeling language as enterprise architect add-in Challenges in balancing the amount of solution information in requirement specifications for embedded products Requirements reviews revisited: Residual challenges and open research questions Identifying top challenges for international research on requirements engineering for systems of systems engineering
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1