Evaluation of Organic Acids Implementation in Stimulating Tight Gas Reservoirs: A Case Study on Sarah Sandstone Formation

Ellewa Ahmed Elsheikh, T. Moawad, A. Alnetaifi, Abdulrahman Alquraishi, Y. Almutawea
{"title":"Evaluation of Organic Acids Implementation in Stimulating Tight Gas Reservoirs: A Case Study on Sarah Sandstone Formation","authors":"Ellewa Ahmed Elsheikh, T. Moawad, A. Alnetaifi, Abdulrahman Alquraishi, Y. Almutawea","doi":"10.2118/200242-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Sandstone formations are yet stimulated with mud acid when matrix acidizing is most competent. In terms of high-pressure high-temperature (HP-HT) conditions, the corrosive impact of hydrochloric (HCl) acid prompted the need to explore other alternatives to mud acid. This study examines the efficiency of organic acids in stimulating Sarah sandstone, a tight gas formation of potential.\n Two Berea cores were first exploited to investigate the optimum and most efficient injected acid volume. The mineralogy of Sarah formation was identified using X-ray diffraction (XRD) aided by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). Formation mineralogy led to the selection of acetic-HF and oxalic-HF as proper acids for stimulation experiments. Bentonite water-base mud was used to alter the permeability of three fresh Sarah sandstone core samples. The organic-HF acids were used to stimulate two core samples, while mud acid was tested in the third core for comparison. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDX) and SEM were utilized to study the impact of acids on porous media.\n Experiments conducted in Berea core samples led to the execution of five pore volumes (PV) of preflush and one PV of main treatment as the optimum volume during the acidizing trials. XRD and SEM identified pore-filling clay minerals causing the low permeability of Sarah formation. Furthermore, the water-base mud injected decreased the permeability further by 80%. Oxalic-HF and acetic-HF mixtures recovered the initial permeability of core samples by 46% and 35% respectively. SEM-EDX results showed how organic acids have partially unblocked the pathways of the structural pores leading to permeability enhancement.\n This research not only recommends the use of oxalic-HF acid for acidizing Sarah sandstone formation but also spotlights the ability of organic acids employment as preflush in hydraulic fracturing operations.","PeriodicalId":11113,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, March 21, 2022","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, March 21, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/200242-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sandstone formations are yet stimulated with mud acid when matrix acidizing is most competent. In terms of high-pressure high-temperature (HP-HT) conditions, the corrosive impact of hydrochloric (HCl) acid prompted the need to explore other alternatives to mud acid. This study examines the efficiency of organic acids in stimulating Sarah sandstone, a tight gas formation of potential. Two Berea cores were first exploited to investigate the optimum and most efficient injected acid volume. The mineralogy of Sarah formation was identified using X-ray diffraction (XRD) aided by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). Formation mineralogy led to the selection of acetic-HF and oxalic-HF as proper acids for stimulation experiments. Bentonite water-base mud was used to alter the permeability of three fresh Sarah sandstone core samples. The organic-HF acids were used to stimulate two core samples, while mud acid was tested in the third core for comparison. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDX) and SEM were utilized to study the impact of acids on porous media. Experiments conducted in Berea core samples led to the execution of five pore volumes (PV) of preflush and one PV of main treatment as the optimum volume during the acidizing trials. XRD and SEM identified pore-filling clay minerals causing the low permeability of Sarah formation. Furthermore, the water-base mud injected decreased the permeability further by 80%. Oxalic-HF and acetic-HF mixtures recovered the initial permeability of core samples by 46% and 35% respectively. SEM-EDX results showed how organic acids have partially unblocked the pathways of the structural pores leading to permeability enhancement. This research not only recommends the use of oxalic-HF acid for acidizing Sarah sandstone formation but also spotlights the ability of organic acids employment as preflush in hydraulic fracturing operations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有机酸在致密气藏增产中的应用评价——以萨拉砂岩组为例
砂岩层在基质酸化能力最强的时候,还需要进行泥浆酸化。在高压高温(HP-HT)条件下,盐酸(HCl)酸的腐蚀性影响促使人们需要探索泥浆酸的其他替代品。本研究考察了有机酸对Sarah砂岩(一种致密气储层)的增产效果。首先开发了两个Berea岩心,以研究最佳和最有效的注入酸体积。利用x射线衍射(XRD)和扫描电镜(SEM)对Sarah地层进行了矿物学鉴定。地层矿物学决定了选择醋酸- hf和草酸- hf作为刺激实验的合适酸。利用膨润土水基泥浆对萨拉砂岩岩心的渗透率进行了改变。有机氢氟酸对两个岩心样品进行了刺激,而泥浆酸对第三个岩心进行了对比。利用能量色散x射线能谱仪(EDX)和扫描电镜(SEM)研究了酸对多孔介质的影响。在Berea岩心样品中进行的实验表明,在酸化试验中,执行5个预冲孔体积(PV)和1个主处理孔体积(PV)作为最佳孔体积。XRD和SEM鉴定了导致Sarah地层低渗透率的填孔粘土矿物。此外,注入的水基泥浆进一步降低了80%的渗透率。草酸- hf和乙酸- hf混合物分别恢复岩心样品的初始渗透率46%和35%。SEM-EDX结果显示了有机酸如何部分地打开了结构孔的通道,从而提高了渗透率。该研究不仅推荐使用草酸-氢氟酸对Sarah砂岩地层进行酸化,而且强调了有机酸在水力压裂作业中作为预冲水的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mukhaizna Steam Flood Project: Thermal Surveillance Practices and Log Response Brine to Enhance the Transport of Encapsulated Petroleum Sulfonates Nanosurfactants Deeper into the High Temperature Carbonate Reservoirs A Self-Adaptive Artificial Neural Network Technique to Estimate Static Young's Modulus Based on Well Logs Diverse Asphaltene Challenges in a Mature Field: A Fluid Study from Iraq Artificial-Intelligence Based Horizontal Well Placement Optimization Leveraging Geological and Engineering Attributes, and Expert-Based Workflows
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1