CakeML: a verified implementation of ML

Ramana Kumar, Magnus O. Myreen, Michael Norrish, Scott Owens
{"title":"CakeML: a verified implementation of ML","authors":"Ramana Kumar, Magnus O. Myreen, Michael Norrish, Scott Owens","doi":"10.1145/2535838.2535841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We have developed and mechanically verified an ML system called CakeML, which supports a substantial subset of Standard ML. CakeML is implemented as an interactive read-eval-print loop (REPL) in x86-64 machine code. Our correctness theorem ensures that this REPL implementation prints only those results permitted by the semantics of CakeML. Our verification effort touches on a breadth of topics including lexing, parsing, type checking, incremental and dynamic compilation, garbage collection, arbitrary-precision arithmetic, and compiler bootstrapping. Our contributions are twofold. The first is simply in building a system that is end-to-end verified, demonstrating that each piece of such a verification effort can in practice be composed with the others, and ensuring that none of the pieces rely on any over-simplifying assumptions. The second is developing novel approaches to some of the more challenging aspects of the verification. In particular, our formally verified compiler can bootstrap itself: we apply the verified compiler to itself to produce a verified machine-code implementation of the compiler. Additionally, our compiler proof handles diverging input programs with a lightweight approach based on logical timeout exceptions. The entire development was carried out in the HOL4 theorem prover.","PeriodicalId":20683,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 41st ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages","volume":"73 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"351","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 41st ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2535838.2535841","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 351

Abstract

We have developed and mechanically verified an ML system called CakeML, which supports a substantial subset of Standard ML. CakeML is implemented as an interactive read-eval-print loop (REPL) in x86-64 machine code. Our correctness theorem ensures that this REPL implementation prints only those results permitted by the semantics of CakeML. Our verification effort touches on a breadth of topics including lexing, parsing, type checking, incremental and dynamic compilation, garbage collection, arbitrary-precision arithmetic, and compiler bootstrapping. Our contributions are twofold. The first is simply in building a system that is end-to-end verified, demonstrating that each piece of such a verification effort can in practice be composed with the others, and ensuring that none of the pieces rely on any over-simplifying assumptions. The second is developing novel approaches to some of the more challenging aspects of the verification. In particular, our formally verified compiler can bootstrap itself: we apply the verified compiler to itself to produce a verified machine-code implementation of the compiler. Additionally, our compiler proof handles diverging input programs with a lightweight approach based on logical timeout exceptions. The entire development was carried out in the HOL4 theorem prover.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CakeML:一个经过验证的ML实现
我们已经开发并机械验证了一个名为CakeML的ML系统,它支持标准ML的大量子集。CakeML在x86-64机器码中实现为交互式读取-执行-打印循环(REPL)。我们的正确性定理确保这个REPL实现只打印CakeML语义允许的结果。我们的验证工作涉及广泛的主题,包括词法分析、解析、类型检查、增量和动态编译、垃圾收集、任意精度算术和编译器引导。我们的贡献是双重的。首先是简单地构建一个端到端验证的系统,证明这种验证工作的每个部分在实践中可以与其他部分组成,并确保没有任何部分依赖于任何过度简化的假设。第二是为核查工作中一些较具挑战性的方面发展新的方法。特别是,经过正式验证的编译器可以自我引导:我们将经过验证的编译器应用于其自身,以生成经过验证的编译器的机器码实现。此外,我们的编译器证明使用基于逻辑超时异常的轻量级方法处理发散的输入程序。整个开发是在HOL4定理证明中进行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Session details: Verified systems Session details: Semantic models 2 Session details: Program analysis 3 Session details: Program analysis 1 Session details: Type system design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1