Successful Acid Stimulation in Limestone - Tobo-Monserrate Formation in Gigante Field - Colombia

Zheng Zheng, O. Jaramillo, Jhon Patiño, John Reina, Carlos Pacheco
{"title":"Successful Acid Stimulation in Limestone - Tobo-Monserrate Formation in Gigante Field - Colombia","authors":"Zheng Zheng, O. Jaramillo, Jhon Patiño, John Reina, Carlos Pacheco","doi":"10.2118/206037-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper presents the successful stimulation workflow case for a carbonate acidizing pilot project performed in Gigante field in the Matambo block of the Upper Magdalena Valley basin in Colombia. An adecuate diagnostic, laboratory testing, treatment fluid selection, on-site QAQC and placement technique selection was fundamental to obtain a successful design and an optimized application.\n Gigante field production is mainly coming from Tetuan and Caballos units producing 32-degree API crude oil during several years. Specifically, in Gigante-2 ST well, oil production has declined until its commercial limit.\n During a candidate wells review, it was identified a previous acid stimulation treatment performed in Tobo-Monserrate formation in Gigante-1 with very poor results in oil production –short production time in natural flow– giving to this zone a low potential as oil producer and it was not considered as a primary target zone. The well was completed in its main target at Tetuan formation leaving Tobo-Monserrate behind an intermediate 7 in casing with no future expectatives to produce.\n After a reservoir evaluation of Tobo-Monserrate formation done in Gigante-2 ST well, it was selected as a candidate for an intermedia matrix stimulation job to evaluate the real potential of this formation in Matambo block. During this phase, reservoir samples were tested against different acid treatments in the laboratory.\n A gelled HCL based acid was selected based on their laboratory testing performance to delay acid reaction –improving acid penetration– and having fluid loss control to enhance reservoir coverage.\n The complete chemical formula was customized to match the oil-treatment compatibility. An organic solvents treatment was added to dissolve organic scale prior to the acidizing. Acid was deployed directly through a TCP string to optimatize the operational time and managing treatment rate according to the pressure behavior.\n During the acid pumping, a pressure drop is observed and treatment rate was increased to generate rate diversion. Gigante-2 ST well came in production at natural flow reaching 502 BOPD and 105 MSCFD evaluated after 35 days of the stimulation job proving and adding important hydrocarbon reserves from Tobo-Monserrate formation. A post job evaluation using a specialized chemical stimulation simulator shows a significant skin removal. Measured treatment pressure and rate were matched with the simulated parameters resulting in −3.24 of skin value post acid stimulation having a productivity improvement factor of 4.35 and an average wormhole penetration estimated from 60 to 75 in into the reservoir. A correct diagnostic, reservoir understanding, design, laboratory testing, execution and post job evaluation was the right route to obtain a successful stimulation job in operational terms and production results.\n This paper is intended as a guideline for stimulation jobs in future interventions where the exact reservoir mineralogy is unknown. It shows a step-by-step methodology, a customized acid formula and finally, stimulation results as well as recommendations and learned lessons.","PeriodicalId":10928,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, September 22, 2021","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, September 22, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/206037-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents the successful stimulation workflow case for a carbonate acidizing pilot project performed in Gigante field in the Matambo block of the Upper Magdalena Valley basin in Colombia. An adecuate diagnostic, laboratory testing, treatment fluid selection, on-site QAQC and placement technique selection was fundamental to obtain a successful design and an optimized application. Gigante field production is mainly coming from Tetuan and Caballos units producing 32-degree API crude oil during several years. Specifically, in Gigante-2 ST well, oil production has declined until its commercial limit. During a candidate wells review, it was identified a previous acid stimulation treatment performed in Tobo-Monserrate formation in Gigante-1 with very poor results in oil production –short production time in natural flow– giving to this zone a low potential as oil producer and it was not considered as a primary target zone. The well was completed in its main target at Tetuan formation leaving Tobo-Monserrate behind an intermediate 7 in casing with no future expectatives to produce. After a reservoir evaluation of Tobo-Monserrate formation done in Gigante-2 ST well, it was selected as a candidate for an intermedia matrix stimulation job to evaluate the real potential of this formation in Matambo block. During this phase, reservoir samples were tested against different acid treatments in the laboratory. A gelled HCL based acid was selected based on their laboratory testing performance to delay acid reaction –improving acid penetration– and having fluid loss control to enhance reservoir coverage. The complete chemical formula was customized to match the oil-treatment compatibility. An organic solvents treatment was added to dissolve organic scale prior to the acidizing. Acid was deployed directly through a TCP string to optimatize the operational time and managing treatment rate according to the pressure behavior. During the acid pumping, a pressure drop is observed and treatment rate was increased to generate rate diversion. Gigante-2 ST well came in production at natural flow reaching 502 BOPD and 105 MSCFD evaluated after 35 days of the stimulation job proving and adding important hydrocarbon reserves from Tobo-Monserrate formation. A post job evaluation using a specialized chemical stimulation simulator shows a significant skin removal. Measured treatment pressure and rate were matched with the simulated parameters resulting in −3.24 of skin value post acid stimulation having a productivity improvement factor of 4.35 and an average wormhole penetration estimated from 60 to 75 in into the reservoir. A correct diagnostic, reservoir understanding, design, laboratory testing, execution and post job evaluation was the right route to obtain a successful stimulation job in operational terms and production results. This paper is intended as a guideline for stimulation jobs in future interventions where the exact reservoir mineralogy is unknown. It shows a step-by-step methodology, a customized acid formula and finally, stimulation results as well as recommendations and learned lessons.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
哥伦比亚Gigante油田灰岩- Tobo-Monserrate地层酸化改造成功
本文介绍了在哥伦比亚上马格达莱纳河谷盆地Matambo区块的Gigante油田进行的碳酸盐岩酸化试点项目的成功增产工作流程。充分的诊断、实验室测试、处理液选择、现场质量控制和放置技术选择是获得成功设计和优化应用的基础。Gigante油田的产量主要来自Tetuan和Caballos油田,几年来生产32度API原油。具体来说,在Gigante-2 ST井,石油产量一直下降到商业极限。在对候选井的评估中,发现之前在Gigante-1的Tobo-Monserrate地层进行的酸增产处理效果非常差,在自然流动中生产时间短,使得该层的产油潜力很低,因此没有被认为是主要的目标层。该井在Tetuan地层的主要目标井完成,Tobo-Monserrate只剩下中间7英尺的套管,未来没有预期生产。在Gigante-2 ST井对Tobo-Monserrate地层进行储层评价后,该地层被选为中间基质增产作业的候选区域,以评估该地层在Matambo区块的实际潜力。在这一阶段,储层样品在实验室中进行了不同酸处理的测试。根据实验室测试性能,选择了一种凝胶化的HCL基酸,以延迟酸反应,改善酸渗透,并控制滤失,提高储层覆盖率。完整的化学配方是定制的,以匹配油处理兼容性。在酸化前加入有机溶剂处理以溶解有机垢。酸直接通过TCP管柱下入,根据压力变化优化作业时间和管理处理率。在抽酸过程中,观察到压力下降,并提高处理率以产生速率转移。经过35天的增产作业,证明并增加了Tobo-Monserrate地层的重要油气储量,Gigante-2 ST井在自然流量达到502桶/天、105立方米/天的情况下投产。使用专门的化学刺激模拟器进行的工作后评估显示明显的皮肤去除。测量的处理压力和速率与模拟参数相匹配,酸处理后的表皮值为- 3.24,产能提高系数为4.35,平均虫孔深度估计为60 ~ 75英寸。正确的诊断、油藏认识、设计、实验室测试、执行和作业后评价是获得成功的增产作业和生产结果的正确途径。本文的目的是为今后在不知道确切储层矿物学的情况下进行增产作业提供指导。它展示了一个循序渐进的方法,一个定制的酸配方,最后是增产结果,以及建议和经验教训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dynamics of Wettability Alteration from Alkali/Nanoparticles/Polymer Flooding - Integrating Data of Imbibition, Contact Angle and Interfacial-Tension to Screen Injection Agents Benchmarking and Field-Testing of the Distributed Quasi-Newton Derivative-Free Optimization Method for Field Development Optimization Aplicability of an Innovative and Light Seismic Approach to Monitor SAGD Operations in Surmont: A Blind Test Four Simple Questions: Decision-Centered Risk and Project Management Gas Migration in Wellbores During Pressurized Mud Cap Drilling PMCD
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1