{"title":"16S rRNA as an applied tool in the molecular characterization of genera and species of bacteria","authors":"Liliana Yanet Suárez-Contreras, Luz Francy Yañez-Meneses","doi":"10.22463/0122820X.2430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bacterial identification is carried out by conventional methods based on phenotypic characteristics, since their implementation and costs are more easily accessible. However, molecular identification allows us to know the true identity of the genus and species. The molecular identification of 24 bacterial strains preserved in the Strain Bank of the University Francisco de Paula Santander, Campos Eliseos Experimental Center, identified under macroscopic and microscopic phenotypic criteria, was carried out. Initially, the strains preserved in saline solution were reactivated and characterized macro- and microscopically, then DNA extraction was performed and PCR was done to amplify the 16S rRNA region allowing access to the DNA sequence of interest; the samples were sent to be sequenced and through bioinformatic tools the identity of each bacterium was known. The strains: BLB003, BLB009, BLB011, BLB012, BLB014, BLB016, BLB018, BLB022, BLB023, BLB024, BLB033, were identified as Bacillus cereus; BLB010 as Bacillus thurigiensis; while BLB030, BLB031, BLB032, as Bacillus pumilus; BLB020 as Bacillus amyloliquefaciens; BLB001, BLB004, BLB007, and BLB037, formed the group of Bacillus subtilis; and it is possible that there are divergent ramifications between species of Bacillus in phylogenetic trees. Another grouping that was observed in the phylogenetic tree are the strains BLB019 and BLB029 that correspond to Achromobacter xylosoxidans and Alcaligenes faecalis respectively. Also another group BLB013 and BLB017, were identified as Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. It is important to take into account that sometimes 16S rRNA presents a low discrimination capacity for some genera and species due to recent divergences, it is necessary to complement the identification with the study of other genes.","PeriodicalId":20991,"journal":{"name":"Respuestas","volume":"73 1","pages":"127-137"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respuestas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22463/0122820X.2430","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Bacterial identification is carried out by conventional methods based on phenotypic characteristics, since their implementation and costs are more easily accessible. However, molecular identification allows us to know the true identity of the genus and species. The molecular identification of 24 bacterial strains preserved in the Strain Bank of the University Francisco de Paula Santander, Campos Eliseos Experimental Center, identified under macroscopic and microscopic phenotypic criteria, was carried out. Initially, the strains preserved in saline solution were reactivated and characterized macro- and microscopically, then DNA extraction was performed and PCR was done to amplify the 16S rRNA region allowing access to the DNA sequence of interest; the samples were sent to be sequenced and through bioinformatic tools the identity of each bacterium was known. The strains: BLB003, BLB009, BLB011, BLB012, BLB014, BLB016, BLB018, BLB022, BLB023, BLB024, BLB033, were identified as Bacillus cereus; BLB010 as Bacillus thurigiensis; while BLB030, BLB031, BLB032, as Bacillus pumilus; BLB020 as Bacillus amyloliquefaciens; BLB001, BLB004, BLB007, and BLB037, formed the group of Bacillus subtilis; and it is possible that there are divergent ramifications between species of Bacillus in phylogenetic trees. Another grouping that was observed in the phylogenetic tree are the strains BLB019 and BLB029 that correspond to Achromobacter xylosoxidans and Alcaligenes faecalis respectively. Also another group BLB013 and BLB017, were identified as Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. It is important to take into account that sometimes 16S rRNA presents a low discrimination capacity for some genera and species due to recent divergences, it is necessary to complement the identification with the study of other genes.
细菌鉴定是通过基于表型特征的传统方法进行的,因为它们的实施和成本更容易获得。然而,分子鉴定使我们能够知道属和种的真实身份。对Campos Eliseos实验中心Francisco de Paula Santander大学菌株库保存的24株细菌进行了分子鉴定,并根据宏观和微观表型标准进行了鉴定。首先,将保存在盐水溶液中的菌株重新激活并进行宏观和微观表征,然后进行DNA提取并进行PCR扩增16S rRNA区域,从而获得感兴趣的DNA序列;这些样本被送去测序,并通过生物信息学工具确定了每种细菌的身份。鉴定菌株BLB003、BLB009、BLB011、BLB012、BLB014、BLB016、BLB018、BLB022、BLB023、BLB024、BLB033为蜡样芽孢杆菌;BLB010为苏云金芽孢杆菌;BLB030、BLB031、BLB032为矮芽孢杆菌;BLB020为解淀粉芽孢杆菌;BLB001、BLB004、BLB007、BLB037组成枯草芽孢杆菌群;在系统发育树上,芽孢杆菌种之间可能存在不同的分支。在系统发育树上观察到的另一个类群是菌株BLB019和BLB029,分别对应于xylosoxidans无色杆菌和Alcaligenes faecalis。另一组BLB013和BLB017被鉴定为嗜麦芽窄养单胞菌。需要注意的是,由于近期的分化,有时16S rRNA对某些属、种的鉴别能力较低,有必要与其他基因的鉴定研究相补充。