Waist circumference in the assessment of obesity and associated risk factors in coronary artery disease patients

S. Carroll , C.B. Cooke , R.J. Butterly , J.W.D. Moxon , J.W.A. Moxon , M. Dudfield
{"title":"Waist circumference in the assessment of obesity and associated risk factors in coronary artery disease patients","authors":"S. Carroll ,&nbsp;C.B. Cooke ,&nbsp;R.J. Butterly ,&nbsp;J.W.D. Moxon ,&nbsp;J.W.A. Moxon ,&nbsp;M. Dudfield","doi":"10.1054/chec.2000.0096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Waist circumference ‘action levels’ have been recommended as a screening tool for overweight/obesity and associated metabolic risk factors. The use of waist circumference action levels in identifying need for weight management and higher metabolic risk was evaluated in 541 consecutive coronary artery disease patient referrals (85 female) to a long-term maintenance, community-based cardiac rehabilitation programme. Recommended waist circumference action levels identified overweight and obese patients (body mass index (BMI ≥ 25.0<!--> <!-->kg·m<sup>–2</sup>and ≥ 30.0<!--> <!-->kg·m<sup>–2</sup>, respectively) and those with lower BMI but abdominal adiposity (waist:hip ratio ≥ 0.95 males, ≥ 0.80 females) with high sensitivity and specificity values. The prevalence of several metabolic risk factors was different between male and female patients in this cohort. Male patients exceeding the lower waist circumference action level (≥ 94<!--> <!-->cm) showed significantly increased odds ratios for hypertriglyceridemia; those at the higher action level (≥ 102<!--> <!-->cm) additionally exhibiting low high density lipoprotein cholesterol, a raised TC:HDL-C ratio and diastolic hypertension. Male subjects with increased waist circumferences were also 2–3 times as likely to have multiple (≥ 3) metabolic risk factors. Higher odds ratios were evident only for hypertriglyceridemia in female patients above the higher action level (≥ 88<!--> <!-->cm). Waist circumference action levels (94<!--> <!-->cm and 102<!--> <!-->cm in males; 80 and 88<!--> <!-->cm in females) may be utilized in secondary prevention settings to identify subjects requiring weight management. Furthermore, waist circumferences higher than the recommended action levels may also indicate increased metabolic risk despite standard cardioprotective drug therapy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100334,"journal":{"name":"Coronary Health Care","volume":"4 4","pages":"Pages 179-186"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1054/chec.2000.0096","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coronary Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1362326500900968","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Waist circumference ‘action levels’ have been recommended as a screening tool for overweight/obesity and associated metabolic risk factors. The use of waist circumference action levels in identifying need for weight management and higher metabolic risk was evaluated in 541 consecutive coronary artery disease patient referrals (85 female) to a long-term maintenance, community-based cardiac rehabilitation programme. Recommended waist circumference action levels identified overweight and obese patients (body mass index (BMI ≥ 25.0 kg·m–2and ≥ 30.0 kg·m–2, respectively) and those with lower BMI but abdominal adiposity (waist:hip ratio ≥ 0.95 males, ≥ 0.80 females) with high sensitivity and specificity values. The prevalence of several metabolic risk factors was different between male and female patients in this cohort. Male patients exceeding the lower waist circumference action level (≥ 94 cm) showed significantly increased odds ratios for hypertriglyceridemia; those at the higher action level (≥ 102 cm) additionally exhibiting low high density lipoprotein cholesterol, a raised TC:HDL-C ratio and diastolic hypertension. Male subjects with increased waist circumferences were also 2–3 times as likely to have multiple (≥ 3) metabolic risk factors. Higher odds ratios were evident only for hypertriglyceridemia in female patients above the higher action level (≥ 88 cm). Waist circumference action levels (94 cm and 102 cm in males; 80 and 88 cm in females) may be utilized in secondary prevention settings to identify subjects requiring weight management. Furthermore, waist circumferences higher than the recommended action levels may also indicate increased metabolic risk despite standard cardioprotective drug therapy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腰围在评估冠心病患者肥胖及相关危险因素中的作用
腰围“活动水平”被推荐作为超重/肥胖及相关代谢危险因素的筛查工具。对541名连续转诊至长期维持社区心脏康复计划的冠状动脉疾病患者(85名女性)进行了腰围活动水平评估,以确定是否需要体重管理和较高的代谢风险。推荐腰围运动水平对超重和肥胖患者(体重指数(BMI≥25.0 kg·m-2和≥30.0 kg·m-2)和BMI较低但腹部肥胖患者(腰臀比男性≥0.95,女性≥0.80)具有较高的敏感性和特异性值。在这个队列中,几个代谢危险因素的患病率在男性和女性患者之间是不同的。超过下腰围动作水平(≥94 cm)的男性患者高甘油三酯血症的优势比显著增加;作用水平较高(≥102 cm)的患者还表现出低高密度脂蛋白胆固醇、TC:HDL-C比值升高和舒张期高血压。腰围增加的男性受试者具有多种(≥3种)代谢危险因素的可能性也增加了2-3倍。只有在高作用水平(≥88 cm)以上的高甘油三酯血症女性患者中才有较高的优势比。腰围运动水平(男性94厘米和102厘米);80和88厘米(女性))可用于二级预防机构,以确定需要体重管理的受试者。此外,尽管标准的心脏保护药物治疗,腰围高于推荐的行动水平也可能表明代谢风险增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cardiac rehabilitation after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: its effect on ischaemia, functional capacity, and a multivariate index of prognosis Improving outcomes in chronic heart failure Helicobacter pylori relation to acute myocardial infarction in an Iranian sample Continuation and initiation of preventive care in general practice following myocardial infarction On death, dying and not dying
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1