Acceptance, hesitancy, and refusal of coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine and associated factors in the population of Libya: A cross-sectional study

Faisal Ismail, Atiya Farag, Fatmah H Alsharif, A. Albakoush, S. Haq, A. Zorgani
{"title":"Acceptance, hesitancy, and refusal of coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine and associated factors in the population of Libya: A cross-sectional study","authors":"Faisal Ismail, Atiya Farag, Fatmah H Alsharif, A. Albakoush, S. Haq, A. Zorgani","doi":"10.4103/ljms.ljms_34_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aims: To obtain herd immunity and control the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection, a large proportion of the population must be vaccinated. However, not everyone in Libya believes in the necessity or safety of COVID-19 vaccines. Therefore, understanding the reasons and variables impacting vaccine hesitation in the Libyan population will assist in developing strategies to reduce this hesitation and achieve better vaccination levels in the country. This study aimed to investigate the acceptance, hesitancy, and refusal of the COVID-19 vaccine and the factors that influence COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and denial in the Libyan population. Methods: A cross-sectional survey using a snowball sampling strategy to collect data was conducted between February and May 2022. Descriptive statistics and the Chi-square test were used for data analysis. Study questionnaires were distributed using social media. Results: The overall COVID-19 vaccine acceptance was 39.7%, vaccine hesitancy was 36.6%, and vaccine refusal was 23.6% among the study participants. The highest refusal rate was among participants aged 12–24 years, 49 out of 91 (53.8%). Vaccine refusal was similar in males and females; however, vaccine acceptance was higher among females than males. Vaccine acceptance was higher in people with a higher graduate degree than those less educated (P = 0001). Conclusion: Our findings show that vaccine hesitancy was 36.6% and vaccine refusal was 23.6% among the study participants. The study identified reasons for vaccine hesitancy and refusal and proposed education programs to address misbeliefs about the COVID-19 vaccine, allowing people to make informed decisions.","PeriodicalId":18055,"journal":{"name":"Libyan Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"54 1","pages":"83 - 87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Libyan Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ljms.ljms_34_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims: To obtain herd immunity and control the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection, a large proportion of the population must be vaccinated. However, not everyone in Libya believes in the necessity or safety of COVID-19 vaccines. Therefore, understanding the reasons and variables impacting vaccine hesitation in the Libyan population will assist in developing strategies to reduce this hesitation and achieve better vaccination levels in the country. This study aimed to investigate the acceptance, hesitancy, and refusal of the COVID-19 vaccine and the factors that influence COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and denial in the Libyan population. Methods: A cross-sectional survey using a snowball sampling strategy to collect data was conducted between February and May 2022. Descriptive statistics and the Chi-square test were used for data analysis. Study questionnaires were distributed using social media. Results: The overall COVID-19 vaccine acceptance was 39.7%, vaccine hesitancy was 36.6%, and vaccine refusal was 23.6% among the study participants. The highest refusal rate was among participants aged 12–24 years, 49 out of 91 (53.8%). Vaccine refusal was similar in males and females; however, vaccine acceptance was higher among females than males. Vaccine acceptance was higher in people with a higher graduate degree than those less educated (P = 0001). Conclusion: Our findings show that vaccine hesitancy was 36.6% and vaccine refusal was 23.6% among the study participants. The study identified reasons for vaccine hesitancy and refusal and proposed education programs to address misbeliefs about the COVID-19 vaccine, allowing people to make informed decisions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利比亚人群对2019冠状病毒病疫苗的接受、犹豫和拒绝及其相关因素:一项横断面研究
背景与目的:为了获得群体免疫,控制2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)感染,必须在很大比例的人群中接种疫苗。然而,并非所有利比亚人都相信COVID-19疫苗的必要性或安全性。因此,了解影响利比亚人口疫苗犹豫的原因和变量将有助于制定减少这种犹豫的战略,并在该国实现更好的疫苗接种水平。本研究旨在调查利比亚人群对COVID-19疫苗的接受、犹豫和拒绝情况,以及影响COVID-19疫苗犹豫和拒绝的因素。方法:采用滚雪球抽样法,于2022年2月至5月进行横断面调查。数据分析采用描述性统计和卡方检验。研究问卷通过社交媒体分发。结果:新冠肺炎疫苗接受率为39.7%,疫苗犹豫率为36.6%,拒绝率为23.6%。拒绝率最高的是12-24岁的参与者,91人中有49人(53.8%)。男性和女性拒绝接种疫苗的情况相似;然而,女性接受疫苗的比例高于男性。研究生学历较高的人群接受疫苗的比例高于受教育程度较低的人群(P = 0001)。结论:研究对象中疫苗犹豫率为36.6%,拒绝率为23.6%。该研究确定了疫苗犹豫和拒绝接种的原因,并提出了教育计划,以解决对COVID-19疫苗的误解,使人们能够做出明智的决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluating quality of anticoagulation management among antiphospholipid syndrome patients: An observational cohort study Effectiveness and safety of direct-acting antiviral in hemodialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C: A real clinical experience Clinical venous thromboembolism in spinal trauma with and without spinal cord injury: A 3-year experience of midlands centre for spinal injuries, Oswestry, UK The incidence and risk factors for barotrauma in COVID-19 in intensive care unit, a single-center retrospective study Anabolic androgenic steroids-induced acute “Tombstone” ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1