Influence of thickness difference on color change of contemporary Computer Aided Designing/Computer Aided Manufacturing glass-ceramic materials

Ahmed El Shazely, M. Kamel, Fatma Hasnain
{"title":"Influence of thickness difference on color change of contemporary Computer Aided Designing/Computer Aided Manufacturing glass-ceramic materials","authors":"Ahmed El Shazely, M. Kamel, Fatma Hasnain","doi":"10.4103/tdj.tdj_43_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose To study the effect of thickness difference on color change of glass ceramic materials. Patients and methods Sixty three specimens were divided according to type of the material into three groups (n = 21) as follow Leucite based glass-ceramic (IPS Empress CAD), lithium disilicate based glass ceramic (IPS EMAX CAD), zirconia reinforced glass ceramic (celtra duo) and each group was further subdivided into three subgroups according to thickness (0.7, 1, 1.2 mm) seven each. The specimens were sawed by using linear precision saw, were square in shape and their dimension was 10 mm of length, 10 mm of width and three difference thicknesses (0.7, 1, 1.2 mm). The final thickness of specimens was confirmed with a digital caliper for standardization. Each group of specimens was finished according to its material manufacturer instruction, Cary 5000 Spectrophotometer provided from Agilent Technologies was used to measure color difference. One-way analysis of variance used to compare materials after glazing, multiple comparison Tukey test to compare each two materials. Results There was significant difference between all groups. At color width 0.7 and 1 mm, Celtra duo recorded the lowest color difference value while Empress recorded the highest color difference value. There was highly significant difference after glazing between materials where P value more than 0,001. At color width 0.7 and 1.2 mm, there was a highly significant difference after glazing between materials where P value is 0.001. Celtra duo showed the lowest color difference value while Emax and Empress showed equal values where P value more than 0.993. At color width 1 and 1.2 mm, Empress recorded the lowest color difference while Emax recorded the highest value. There was a highly significant difference between Emax versus Empress and Celtra duo versus Empress where P value was 0.001. On the other hand there was no significance recorded between Emax vs celtra duo where (P > 0.984). Conclusion Masking abilities of glass ceramic are affected by ceramic thicknesses, background colors. The masking ability of glass ceramics tends to improve with greater thickness, while translucency decreased.","PeriodicalId":22324,"journal":{"name":"Tanta Dental Journal","volume":"12 1","pages":"6 - 11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tanta Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/tdj.tdj_43_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose To study the effect of thickness difference on color change of glass ceramic materials. Patients and methods Sixty three specimens were divided according to type of the material into three groups (n = 21) as follow Leucite based glass-ceramic (IPS Empress CAD), lithium disilicate based glass ceramic (IPS EMAX CAD), zirconia reinforced glass ceramic (celtra duo) and each group was further subdivided into three subgroups according to thickness (0.7, 1, 1.2 mm) seven each. The specimens were sawed by using linear precision saw, were square in shape and their dimension was 10 mm of length, 10 mm of width and three difference thicknesses (0.7, 1, 1.2 mm). The final thickness of specimens was confirmed with a digital caliper for standardization. Each group of specimens was finished according to its material manufacturer instruction, Cary 5000 Spectrophotometer provided from Agilent Technologies was used to measure color difference. One-way analysis of variance used to compare materials after glazing, multiple comparison Tukey test to compare each two materials. Results There was significant difference between all groups. At color width 0.7 and 1 mm, Celtra duo recorded the lowest color difference value while Empress recorded the highest color difference value. There was highly significant difference after glazing between materials where P value more than 0,001. At color width 0.7 and 1.2 mm, there was a highly significant difference after glazing between materials where P value is 0.001. Celtra duo showed the lowest color difference value while Emax and Empress showed equal values where P value more than 0.993. At color width 1 and 1.2 mm, Empress recorded the lowest color difference while Emax recorded the highest value. There was a highly significant difference between Emax versus Empress and Celtra duo versus Empress where P value was 0.001. On the other hand there was no significance recorded between Emax vs celtra duo where (P > 0.984). Conclusion Masking abilities of glass ceramic are affected by ceramic thicknesses, background colors. The masking ability of glass ceramics tends to improve with greater thickness, while translucency decreased.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
厚度差异对当代计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造玻璃陶瓷材料颜色变化的影响
目的研究厚度差异对玻璃陶瓷材料颜色变化的影响。患者与方法将63个标本按材料类型分为三组(n = 21):白晶石基玻璃陶瓷(IPS Empress CAD)、二硅酸锂基玻璃陶瓷(IPS EMAX CAD)、氧化锆增强玻璃陶瓷(celtra duo),每组按厚度(0.7、1、1.2 mm)再细分为3个亚组,每个亚组7个。试样采用线性精密锯床锯切,形状为正方形,尺寸为长10mm,宽10mm,三种厚度(0.7、1、1.2 mm)。用数字卡尺确定试样的最终厚度,以便标准化。每组标本按照其材料制造商的说明制作,使用安捷伦公司提供的Cary 5000分光光度计测量色差。采用单因素方差分析比较上釉后的材料,采用多重比较Tukey检验比较每两种材料。结果各组间差异有统计学意义。色宽为0.7 mm和1mm时,Celtra duo的色差值最低,而Empress的色差值最高。上光后材料间差异极显著,P值均大于0.001。在色宽0.7和1.2 mm处,不同材料上釉后的差异非常显著,P值为0.001。Celtra duo色差值最低,Emax和Empress色差值相等,P值均大于0.993。在色宽为1和1.2 mm时,Empress的色差最小,Emax的色差最大。Emax与Empress、Celtra二人组与Empress差异极显著,P值为0.001。另一方面,Emax与celtra二组间无显著性差异(P < 0.05)。结论玻璃陶瓷的遮盖能力受陶瓷厚度、底色等因素的影响。玻璃陶瓷的掩蔽能力随厚度的增加而提高,而半透明性降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinical evaluation of complete digital workflow ceramic overlays in treatment of children with molar incisor hypomineralization The effect of anterior esthetic fixed appliance of prematurely lost primary incisors on sound production and speech intelligibility Assessment of oral health practices of school teachers in Dharamshala City, Himachal Pradesh Marginal bone loss associated with unilateral free end mandibular implant supporting superstructures constructed with different occlusal schemes Scanning electron microscopic study of smear layer changes following ultrasonic endoactivator irrigation system during root canal treatment of primary teeth
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1