Feasability of Utilizing a Rapid Screening Tool for Suicide and Major Depressive Disorder in Appalachian Acute Care Settings

Melinda J. Sharon, MPH, Erica Shaver, MD, FACEP, Carmen Burrell, DO, Joseph Minardi, MD, Christopher Kiefer, MD, FACEP, Stephen Davis, PhD, Elyce Biddle, PhD
{"title":"Feasability of Utilizing a Rapid Screening Tool for Suicide and Major Depressive Disorder in Appalachian Acute Care Settings","authors":"Melinda J. Sharon, MPH, Erica Shaver, MD, FACEP, Carmen Burrell, DO, Joseph Minardi, MD, Christopher Kiefer, MD, FACEP, Stephen Davis, PhD, Elyce Biddle, PhD","doi":"10.21885/wvmj.2021.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION Patients who commit suicide will often visit the emergency department (ED) shortly before death for reasons other than those related to the suicide. These visits may be a prime opportunity to identify patients with symptoms of major depressive disorder (MDD) that contribute to suicidal ideation. This pilot study investigated the feasibility of a recently developed tool, the CAD-MDD-S, a combination of the Computerized Adaptive Diagnostic Screening Tool for Major Depressive Disorder (CAD-MDD) and four screening questions from the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS),to identify patients with suicidal thoughts, intent, plans, and behaviors, and/or MDD. METHOD CAD-MDD-S was administered to ambulatory adult patients (18+ years) who presented at an academic ED or student health services clinic for non-mental health concerns. The goal was to study the feasibility and efficiency of the screening tool, assessing the potential impact the tool may have in identifying at risk patients in these clinical settings. RESULTS From August 2015 to November 2016, 345 patients agreed to complete the screening tool (89% agree rate), with 76 screening positive for MDD, 13 for risk of suicide, and 7 for both. The median screening time to completion was six minutes, with 87% of patients taking less than 10 minutes. CONCLUSIONS This pilot study demonstrated that the ad- ministration of the CAD-MDD-S diagnostic screening tool was feasible and efficient in emergency settings, and the time to completion did not present a substantial burden to the patient. Future studies are needed to confirm these findings in other populations with larger samples.","PeriodicalId":23032,"journal":{"name":"The West Virginia medical journal","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The West Virginia medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21885/wvmj.2021.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Patients who commit suicide will often visit the emergency department (ED) shortly before death for reasons other than those related to the suicide. These visits may be a prime opportunity to identify patients with symptoms of major depressive disorder (MDD) that contribute to suicidal ideation. This pilot study investigated the feasibility of a recently developed tool, the CAD-MDD-S, a combination of the Computerized Adaptive Diagnostic Screening Tool for Major Depressive Disorder (CAD-MDD) and four screening questions from the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS),to identify patients with suicidal thoughts, intent, plans, and behaviors, and/or MDD. METHOD CAD-MDD-S was administered to ambulatory adult patients (18+ years) who presented at an academic ED or student health services clinic for non-mental health concerns. The goal was to study the feasibility and efficiency of the screening tool, assessing the potential impact the tool may have in identifying at risk patients in these clinical settings. RESULTS From August 2015 to November 2016, 345 patients agreed to complete the screening tool (89% agree rate), with 76 screening positive for MDD, 13 for risk of suicide, and 7 for both. The median screening time to completion was six minutes, with 87% of patients taking less than 10 minutes. CONCLUSIONS This pilot study demonstrated that the ad- ministration of the CAD-MDD-S diagnostic screening tool was feasible and efficient in emergency settings, and the time to completion did not present a substantial burden to the patient. Future studies are needed to confirm these findings in other populations with larger samples.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在阿巴拉契亚急症护理机构中使用自杀和重度抑郁症快速筛查工具的可行性
自杀的患者通常会在死亡前不久前往急诊科(ED),原因与自杀无关。这些访问可能是识别导致自杀意念的重度抑郁症(MDD)症状患者的主要机会。这项初步研究调查了最近开发的工具CAD-MDD- s的可行性,CAD-MDD是计算机自适应诊断筛选工具(CAD-MDD)和哥伦比亚自杀严重程度评定量表(C-SSRS)中的四个筛选问题的组合,用于识别有自杀想法、意图、计划和行为和/或MDD的患者。方法CAD-MDD-S被用于在学术ED或学生健康服务诊所就诊的非心理健康问题的非流动成年患者(18岁以上)。目的是研究筛查工具的可行性和效率,评估该工具在这些临床环境中识别高危患者方面的潜在影响。结果2015年8月至2016年11月,345例患者同意完成筛查工具(89%的同意率),其中76例MDD筛查阳性,13例自杀风险筛查阳性,7例两者均阳性。筛查完成的中位时间为6分钟,87%的患者用时不到10分钟。结论:本初步研究表明,CAD-MDD-S诊断筛查工具的使用在急诊环境中是可行和有效的,并且完成时间不会给患者带来实质性负担。未来的研究需要在其他更大样本的人群中证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
COVID-19 Pandemic Effects on Seasonal Influenza Patterns in West Virginia COVID-19: West Virginia Essential Workers and the Risks They Face The Impact of COVID-19 Infection on Concurrent Traumatic Insults: An Analysis from the West Virginia Trauma System Catatonia Associated with Buprenorphine-Induced Toxic Leukoencephalopathy Recurrent Pneumothorax and a Solitary Pulmonary Nodule: A Case Report of a Rare Sequelae of Histoplasmosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1